Guest guest Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 IndiaArchaeology, "kishore mohan" <kishore_future> wrote: King Asoka (Asoka Vardhana Maurya) was a great king, who has been praised no end. After a change of heart, witnessing the bloody havoc created by war on Kalinga (southern Orissa), he followed the principles of Dhamma. He ardently believed that ethical behaviour should take precedence over the rituals and those rituals, pleasures and festivals which harm animals and people must be discouraged. He initiated several welfare measures, avoided meat and preached morality. Respect for elders, Brahmins, ascetics, respect for people in general and upliftment of down trodden sections were some of his teachings repeated several times. Buddhism has appropriated him through their literature while puranic literature does not recount any of his stories. I doubt whether there is any other literature except which forms part of Buddhist literature which speaks about Asoka. On the other hand, the archaeological proofs of Asoka include rock/pillar/cave edicts and coins. However, the edicts talk of Asoka as Devanam Priya /priyadarsi and only the edict at Maski, Karnataka connects Asoka with the name Priyadarsi. In the history, there was no single Asoka. For that matter, even there were multiple Devanampriya/priyadarsi's. It is not really conclusive who is Asoka/Priyadarsi/Devanampriya who was associated with the edicts. The literature,especially that of Bauddhists, is another facet which has to be reconciled. This post does not concern itself with identifying the king of edicts but only try to list various personalities whose name is asoka/priyadarsana/devanampriya. The group members are invited to add to the information. As mentioned earlier, there is more than one Asoka. Within Mauryan dynasty itself, there seem to be two more Asokas called Vigatasoka, one of them being a contemporary of our Asoka and was also called Tissa and the second , being of two or three generations later. D D Kosambi talks of Kalasoka, the last of Sisunaga dynasty which ruled Magadha. His coins were in circulation even during the days of Mauryan Asoka. It is widely believed that during the time of this Kalasoka, the second Bauddhist conference had taken place. On the otherhand, Kalhana in his Raja Tarangini , talks of Kalasoka being a ruler of Kashmir and belonging to Nandigondiya dynasty. (I- 101.1-2) Being a pacifist and a Bauddhist, he lost his kingdom to his enemies. His son Jalouka has regained it. Construction of Srinagar is attributed to him, though the accepted history says that it was Mauryan Asoka who had built Srinagar for his daughter, who loved the beauty of Lake Dal. The Bauddhist literature talks of a Candasoka, who after his conversion became Dharmasoka. Asokaditya is another name of Samudragupta. Coming to priyadarsi, Chandragupta Maurya, who is the grand father of Asoka was called priya dasana in Mudraraksasa. Dasana seems to be a common name and some puranas talk of a Mauryna king Dasona who has ruled for 8 years, some generations later to Asoka. On the other hand, Asoka's grand son Dasaratha, who has ruled the western part of Magadha, probably even while Asoka was alive, has called himself, Devanam priya. There was a sinhalese king called Devanam priya Tissa. He was a renowned Buddhist king. Second point that needs close look is who has sent the parties of Monks to various foreign countries. Asoka is famous for sending out parties of preachers to various parts of his kingdom and beyond including his daughter and son. But again, Buddhist literature ascribes this to Mogaliputta Tissa, who was perhaps a contemporary of Mauryan Asoka and under whose aegies, the third council had taken place. The time of Asoka is another point which has to be resolved, because though the names mentioned in his edicts are identified with kings of yore belonging to 300bce to 246 bce, thus dating asoka to the third century, these identifications are not without fault and there are viable and alternative suggestions available. Moreover, some of the dates mentioned by Buddhist literature do not fit with the accepted chronology(cf Rommila Thapar ) kishore --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.