[Y-Indology] Origin of Munda tribes

[Guest guest]

Anad ,thank you very much for these informations.I checked some site about

Lemuria. I think there are some doubts in scholars that was it a real island or

not .Perhaps there is no scientific proof that MUNDA tribes started their

journey from that land or not .If you have other informations ,kindly send me

..Iwill be very oblidged for you ,because Munda tribes ,their migrations and

their languages are my subject

 

anand19822001 <smunje wrote:INDOLOGY,

"Aslam Rasoolpuri"

<aslamrasoolpuri> wrote:

> Dear friends

>

> I am from Pakistan and working about old Munda tribes and

> languages .It is supposed that once Munda tribes had been spread

all

> over India.Historians say that Munda tribes are Ausraoid and

reached

> in India from Australia.In the history of Australia it is supposed

> that real inhabitants of Australia reached there 50000 B.C.There is

a

> confusion, from where these inhabitant reached there .If they

reached

> from India (because this was the only way at that time) then we can

> say that Munda was frist inhabitants of Australia and after some

> times they returned to India.Is it right ?Kindly help me

 

Mr. Aslam Rasoolpuri

 

Try these maps of Lemuria in Pacific.

 

http://www.sacred-texts.com/atl/tll/tll01.htm

 

If true, it is easy to see that migrations took place from Lemuria to

India. "Lemuria" was the motherland of mankind (all races).

 

Also read books:

 

"The World before" by Ruth MontGomery

"Children of Mu (Lemuria)" James Churchward

 

Both available from AMAZON.COM

 

 

Satish

 

 

 

INDOLOGY/

 

INDOLOGY

 

 

 

 

India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline.

 

 

[Guest guest]

Aslam Rasoolpuri wrote:

 

> I checked some site about Lemuria. I think there are some doubts in

scholars that was it a

> real island or not.

Generally, sensible scholars regard Churchward's Mu / Lemuria hypothesis as

an unwarranted product of the late Victorian / Edwardian era on a par with

the contemporary Atrlantis theory. Best not to waste your time on that.

 

If you want a plausible suggestion of the origin of the Munda, I suggest you

read: "Eden in the East: The Drowned Continent of the Southeast Asia" by

Stephen Oppenheimer. This outlines a much more convincing and

scientifically-based theory which places the "lost continent" in the SE

Asian peninsular, extending down through the Indonesian and neighbouring

archipelagoes, which he calls Sundaland. Prior to the collapse of the

Laurentide Ice Shield (in Canada) at the very tail end of the last ice-age

(c8000-7000BCE), sea levels world wide would have been significantly lower.

The release of thousands of cubic kilometres of water would have raised the

water very swiftly and inundate any low-lying areas. Oppenheimer is a

geneticist and sees evidence of a huge diaspora of survivors from that

drowned area in genetic data, specifically concerning a variant of

sickle-cell anaemia which is unique to the Borneo / Indonesian region. He

also adduces considerable lingusitic and cultural (eg rice cultivation)

corroboration for his theory.

 

Best wishes,

Stephen Hodge