Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

[correction]Condition for Kaikeyi's marriage.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

There was a mistake in the Sanskrit in my previous post:

 

rajyazulkam should be rAjyazulkam

 

Luis González-Reimann

_____

 

 

At 01:40 PM 6/6/2004 -0700, you wrote:

>Dear P. K. Ramakrishnan,

>

>

>The exact reference for the passage referred to by R. Goldman is 2.99.3, in

>the Critical Edition. The Sanskrit text reads:

>

>purA bhrAtaH pitA naH sa mAtaraM te samudvahan

>mAtAmahe samAzrauSId rajyazulkam anuttamam

>

>

>Regards,

>

>Luis Gonzalez-Reimann

>_________

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...