Guest guest Posted January 29, 2004 Report Share Posted January 29, 2004 INDOLOGY, "Harry Spier" <harryspier@H...> wrote: > > 1. I have Burrows, The Sanskrit Language 1st edition. Does this > differ significantly from the 2nd edition? Once when at a library with both editions, I skimmed through them and found only 1 or 2 pages to be different. In the 1st edition he claimed there was insufficient evidence to conclude whether the Indo-Iranian language of the Mitanni documents was Indo-Aryan or Iranian, and that it likely belonged to a third independent branch. By the 2nd edition he had come around to the fact that it was decidedly Indo-Aryan. David Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.