Guest guest Posted January 25, 2004 Report Share Posted January 25, 2004 There appears to be an organized effort by certain Western research libraries to identify and to film all South Asian newspapers, present and historical. http://www.arl.org/newsltr/206/icon.html ; http://www.lib.washington.edu/Southasia/iconpaper.html The effort has run into resistance from some South Asian libraries possessing copies. The problems encountered, and the attitudes revealed, when permission to film has been sought are interesting for what they also suggest about current attitudes towards scanning old manuscripts and books in South Asia: "Of the 2,500 hundred titles for which I have located holdings, 55% or 1,350 are not currently available in microform. Most have ceased and exist only in fragmentary runs or even single issues. Many of these holdings are in institutions in South Asia where there is, at times, a resistance to microfilming unique materials. Microfilming is preserving, but it is also replicating. An institution's funding may be based on the numbers of researchers drawn to it to use materials unavailable anywhere else. Replicating those sources is seen as having the potential to weaken or even destroy an institution's funding base by taking away its unique character. Some archives make it difficult even for individuals to obtain a complete copy of single documents, so great is this fear of replicating an archive's holdings. Projects, which from the western viewpoint look like win-win for both sides, have fallen through on just this point. Western institutions, willing to pay for filming, are like the date who has paid for dinner and the movies, they want a bit more than "Thank you, it's been a lovely evening". They want access by either owning the negatives or receiving copies for their collections. Some archives, newly introduced to capitalism, believe that there is money to be made and that we are just an extension of a former colonial power, now returned to strip mine their intellectual property and they would prefer to go it alone. And even when the situation is favorable and they are willing to allow filming, our interests may not coincide, what we are want filmed may not be what they want filmed. We need to encourage local efforts at preservation for its own sake. We should pay particular attention to smaller institutions with more limited resources, such as those in Bangladesh or Nepal and, for diaspora papers, those in the Caribbean, Mauritius and East Africa." [see fn. 1.] Why, I ask the void, is there no comparable organized effort for manuscript and book materials? How did this one get started? Who pays for it? Given the existence of this program, it would behoove the Indian research library system to make proposals to these or other libraries to suggest a joint, systematic, and even more successful approach. David p.s. The article is also interesting for its historical data. E.g., the first NRI newspaper was started in 1887: "In 1887, in Singapore, a Tamil language newspaper, the Singai nesan was started. It is the first I have documented which was published by and for a diaspora community." 1. quotation from "South Asian Newspapers," by Irene Joshi South Asia Librarian University of Washington Libraries presented as part of the Symposium on Access to and Preservation of Global Newspapers May 27-28, 1997, Washington DC http://www.lib.washington.edu/Southasia/iconpaper.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.