Guest guest Posted November 19, 2002 Report Share Posted November 19, 2002 Regarding the authorship of anonymous documents like "The Mahatma Letters" it seems the genuineness of the content are best discovered from the documents itself. It seems however wrote "The Mahatma Letters" must have had a contempt for the people they defrauded on a continuous basis, while feigning humility, they sought the triumph of their "Masters" over all of human history and the transcendent Godhead of the great religions himself. The fact is that there is nothing in the Mahatma letters, which could not have been penned by HPB and her educated cohorts. Nothing. The "wisdom" in them is not evidence of a superior knowledge and vision, possessed and seen by ancient beings or ageless beings outside of time. It is the information/knowledge base of persons with a distinct time-limited frame of reference. Projecting their victorian era esoteric world-view back onto the history of thought, the authors appear to be woefully deficient in understanding their "own" so-called Indian sacred traditions. The speculations of the so-called Masters, about ancient Egyptian and Indian thought, were quite limited to the information available to HPB and friends. Their own esoteric studies in Rosicrucianism, Masonry and spiritism etc. and wide reading in religion, history, philosophy and the science of their day, was enough to form the knowledge-base evident in all of the Mahatma letters and HPB's books. Beyond this information, there is nothing, nothing there. They claim to be Masters of ancient Indian or "Esoteric Buddhist" tradition, or whatever, but give no evidence of any real mastery of these traditions at all. At best they appear to be highly educated Westerners and undisciplined Hindu-Buddhist neophytes. Their "voice" is all wrong for real ancient adepts, and the masterful content of their letters is laughable. I will ask "what are the authors of these letters the Masters of? If these letters are their credentials, then what is their apparent qualification for teaching? Where is the proof in the letters that these "Mahatmas" are what and who they say they are? If they knew the truth about "Indian" and Egyptian traditions etc. back then, then why did they teach so much utter nonsense and mislead people?" The "Masters" can be exposed just by examining their claimed expertise. What knowledge is evident in "their" letters? Let us give these "Masters" an exam on real-world Indo-Asian or Egyptian traditions. They will fail. Do you think that they will show-up again to explain to the world why they failed? Surely their self-deluded chelas will rationalize their errors and omissions and contradictions, but anyone, who not so enthralled to them, will see that the "Masters" were masters of exactly what HPB and friends were masters of, and nothing more. I hope to go through some of the Mahatmas' letters to give examples of the above mentioned errors, omissions, contradictions, limitations, "voice" problems and other evidence of the so-called Masters' true identity and qualifications. They were in a sense masters of whatever it was that HBP and friends had mastered...the Western esoteric "wisdom" of their time. However they were rank neophytes when it came to many things that the Mahatmas' claimed mastery of. Thus the "Masters" should be tested on these things. They made the claim of mastery, let them explain themselves. The Times of India reported a few days ago the Theosophy covers "the evolution of mankind" Yet many theosophists today also claim that Hitler was indeed right that he killed 6 million jews (this has been posted by the head of the Theosophical Central Archive on the Internet this year, 2002). Are "The Mahatma Letters" are for real or not. For those who haven't read The Mahatma Letters yet, you can start by commenting on the content of following genuine "Mahatma Letter: http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~muehleb9/mahatmal.html Conclusions gleaned from this tread , answers to "Who wrote the Mahama Letters ?" will be placed on the web site of the University of Vienna, subject Indology. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.