Guest guest Posted November 6, 2002 Report Share Posted November 6, 2002 At 1:19 am +0000 6/11/02, rahula_80 wrote: > > Though it is quite possible that some of the Upanishads are later >> than the Buddha, there're quite a few which clearly predate the >> Buddha. > >Which predate the Buddha? Brha-daranyaka and Chandogya? The BRhadAraNyaka appears to pre-date the earliest Buddhist texts. In it (III.2.13), the law of karma is presented as something new and esoteric, whereas the Buddhist texts have it in a fully developed form. The ChAndogya is generally thought to be about the same date as the BRhadAraNyaka, though the relationship with Buddhist texts is not so clear--by which I mean that it's not necessarily arguing about the same things. > >> The doctrine of anatta itself presupposes a well established atman >> doctrine - as taught by the Upanishads. And in the Vedas it is the >> Upanishads which dwells on such issues. > >I was told that the concept of anatman was present in Upanisads. (And >the Buddha was actually preaching Upanisads doctrine) I don't think the concept of anAtman is taught in any of the principal UpaniSads. The MaitrI, which is late and shows strong Buddhist influence, frequently uses nirAtman, "selfless", of an enlightened person (e.g. at VI.20), and once has nairAtmya, "selflessness" as an apparent synonym for anAtman in a very uncomplimentary passage aimed at Buddhists (VII.8. (Editions of the MaitrI/MaitrAyaNIya vary drastically in their order, numbering etc: these are from Van Buitenen's edition.) Dr Valerie J Roebuck Manchester, UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.