Guest guest Posted January 13, 2002 Report Share Posted January 13, 2002 Madhav wrote: > >Can you cite the actual example you are looking at? That may >help a lot. While one can obviously have both 'tathaagata.h' and >'tathaa gata.h', there would be sometimes a differrence of >meaning. > Dear Madhav, The verse is I.8.3 of the IPK sukhAdiSu ca saukhyAdihetuSvapi ca vastuSu . avabhAsasya sadbhAve 'pyatItatvAt tathAsthitiH .. With " tathAsthitiH " to be construed as either from " tathA-asthitiH " or from " tathA asthitiH ". The editors main point being that it is not to be construed as " tathA-sthitiH " because of meaning and the commentaries, but since he mentioned (if only in passing) that it could be either tathA asthitiH or tathA-asthitiH I was curious if there was any difference in meaning between these two, but from Ashok Aklujkar's explanation I think that in this case tathA asthitiH and tathA-asthitiH are equivalent. Many thanks, Harry Harry Spier 371 Brickman Rd. Hurleyville, NY USA 12747 _______________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.