Guest guest Posted May 19, 2004 Report Share Posted May 19, 2004 Hi, Please do join the following groups dedicated to various Gods and Goddessess, owned by me. Please do bring all your relatives and friends and tell them about these groups and request to join them. But please keep the purtiy of these groups with no obscene or vulgar photos, talks etc. These grouos are purely dedicated to Vedic and Holy discussions and with the respective God and Goddessess and related religious places and talks. Thanking You, Sandeep. AllDeitiesGodsandGoddessess GoddessBhoomiDevi GoddessDurga GoddessGanga goddessgayatri GoddessKali GoddessPadmavathi GoddessParvathi GoddessSanthoshiMaa GoddessSaraswathi GoddessSriLakshmi GoddessVaishnoDevi LordAyyappa LordBrahma LordDattatreya LordKumara LordNarasimha LordRama LordShivaShankara LordSriKrishna LordVenkateshwara LordVinayaka LordVishnu SriHanuman SriSaiBabaofShirdi sweta kamboj <sweta_kamboj wrote: Hello Friends, I request the moderator of this group to kindly add a new member to this group. The name is Pankaj and his email id is pani22 Sai Ram Sweta Sandeep Kodali <doktersandy wrote: Hello Members, I have a doubt regarding Goddess Lakshmi Devi, the Divine Consort of Lord Vishnu. The most popular version is that Goddess Lakshmi is the Daughter of Lord of the Ocean of Milk, i.e., She is Ksheerabdi Kanya. But I also heard that she is the Daughter of Sage Bhrigu and hence she is also called Bhargavi. I never heard this version and I got confused. Please clear this doubt of mine. I only know that Goddess Lakshmi is the Daughter of Lord of Ocean of Milk. How and when was She born as the Daughter of Sage Bhrigu? Please tell me this story. Thank You, Sandeep. India Matrimony: Find your partner online. ShriSaiSatcharitra/ ShriSaiSatcharitra India Matrimony: Find your partner online. India Matrimony: Find your partner online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2004 Report Share Posted May 19, 2004 This isn't the first time you've invited me. I'm very impure. Tamasic to the bone. I collect purient nude photos of baby Ganesha, like on that book by Cartwright. And naked shots of Chamunda Kali, with the hooters that hang down to her knees. Woo-hoo, hubba hubba! Best to take me off your mailing list. Tantrically, -- Len/ Kalipadma On Wed, 19 May 2004 15:45:51 +0100 (BST) =?iso-8859-1?q?Sandeep=20Kodali?= <doktersandy writes: > Hi, > Please do join the following groups dedicated to various Gods and > Goddessess, owned by me. Please do bring all your relatives and > friends and tell them about these groups and request to join them. > But please keep the purtiy of these groups with no obscene or vulgar > photos, talks etc. These grouos are purely dedicated to Vedic and > Holy discussions and with the respective God and Goddessess and > related religious places and talks. > Thanking You, > Sandeep. > > > AllDeitiesGodsandGoddessess > > GoddessBhoomiDevi > > GoddessDurga > > GoddessGanga > > goddessgayatri > > GoddessKali > > GoddessPadmavathi > > GoddessParvathi > > GoddessSanthoshiMaa > > GoddessSaraswathi > > GoddessSriLakshmi > > GoddessVaishnoDevi > > LordAyyappa > > LordBrahma > > LordDattatreya > > LordKumara > > LordNarasimha > > LordRama > > LordShivaShankara > > LordSriKrishna > > LordVenkateshwara > > LordVinayaka > > LordVishnu > > SriHanuman > > SriSaiBabaofShirdi > ______________ The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2004 Report Share Posted May 19, 2004 , kalipadma@j... wrote: > > I'm very impure. Tamasic to the bone. I collect purient nude photos of > baby Ganesha, like on that book by Cartwright. And naked shots of > Chamunda Kali, with the hooters that hang down to her knees. Is there a need to talk about forms of Devi like this? I request you to refrain from writing about Devi like this. This is in poor taste. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2004 Report Share Posted May 19, 2004 kalipadma wrote "I'm very impure. Tamasic to the bone. I collect purient nude photos of baby Ganesha, like on that book by Cartwright. And naked shots of Chamunda Kali, with the hooters that hang down to her knees" Satish :Is there a need to talk about forms of Devi like this? I request you to refrain from writing about Devi like this.This is in poor taste." I dont think so this is in poor taste, Satish. Gosh! I know a personal friend who considers Ganesha as his "guru" called him The Fat boy. And many other names you will be shock to hear. But he is passionate about HIM. Let the moderators decided what is inappropriate and what is not, and we will act accordingly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2004 Report Share Posted May 20, 2004 My sense of humor may lose something when crossing cultures. If I offended Satish, I had no intention to do so, and I apologize. So, I also refer to Ganesha (and Kubera) as "the Fat Boys." And to Sarasvati and Lakshmi as "the Squabbling Sisters." They are all represented on my altar, arrayed aound the Shiva Lingam and Yoni Peetha. -- Len/ Kalipadma On Thu, 20 May 2004 00:08:19 -0000 "N. Madasamy" <ashwini_puralasamy writes: > kalipadma wrote "I'm very impure. Tamasic to the bone. I collect > purient nude photos of baby Ganesha, like on that book by > Cartwright. And naked shots of Chamunda Kali, with the hooters that > > hang down to her knees" > > Satish :Is there a need to talk about forms of Devi like this? I > request you to refrain from writing about Devi like this.This is in > poor taste." > > I dont think so this is in poor taste, Satish. Gosh! I know a > personal friend who considers Ganesha as his "guru" called him The > Fat boy. And many other names you will be shock to hear. But he is > passionate about HIM. > > Let the moderators decided what is inappropriate and what is not, > and > we will act accordingly. > ______________ The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2004 Report Share Posted May 20, 2004 Dear all: I come from a religion which says all paths lead Godward. So IMHO no one can say this or that or that is wrong or correct. If you do not like something ignore it. If it is a tecnical issue give your opinion. It may or may not find support. But we are not intolerent. IMHO the reality of each person is different from that of others. Each live in a world of his own. The group is intended to give expression to all views. As you know, Nikhilism is also recognised as a path in Hinduism. So why bother about these things? Lets go on with our journey while listening to other views also. "N. Madasamy" <ashwini_puralasamy wrote: kalipadma wrote "I'm very impure. Tamasic to the bone. I collect purient nude photos of baby Ganesha, like on that book by Cartwright. And naked shots of Chamunda Kali, with the hooters that hang down to her knees" Satish :Is there a need to talk about forms of Devi like this? I request you to refrain from writing about Devi like this.This is in poor taste." I dont think so this is in poor taste, Satish. Gosh! I know a personal friend who considers Ganesha as his "guru" called him The Fat boy. And many other names you will be shock to hear. But he is passionate about HIM. Let the moderators decided what is inappropriate and what is not, and we will act accordingly. / Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70/year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2004 Report Share Posted May 20, 2004 If someone needs to talk about two of these deities in one sentence which group will they join? Will they have to cross post? I'm sorry but this monopoly on Hinduism is offensive to me. - Sandeep Kodali sweta_kamboj ; Self-knowledge ; sevikas ; sevikas-usa ; ; shirdisai9 ; shirdisaibaba_nc ; Shirdisaidham ; shirdisaiprayerclub ; shiva ; shiva2 ; shiva_bhakthi ; Shivmandir ; SHIVSHAKTI ; shreesiddhivinayak ; shrisai_sathya ; ShriSaiSatcharitra ; singapore_hindus ; skanda ; slntemple ; songofgod ; soundaryalahari09 ; sreecgmath-us ; Sri_Muniswarar ; sri_sreeram ; sribala ; SriRamakrishnaSarada ; SriRamaTemple ; srivaishnavam_update ; Srivaru ; srividya ; srktbc ; SRT-RC ; SSEkids ; swamy_saranam ; swmay ; ; tattvaprakasha ; true_swami_satsang_mumbai Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:45 AM Re: Request Hi, Please do join the following groups dedicated to various Gods and Goddessess, owned by me. Please do bring all your relatives and friends and tell them about these groups and request to join them. But please keep the purtiy of these groups with no obscene or vulgar photos, talks etc. These grouos are purely dedicated to Vedic and Holy discussions and with the respective God and Goddessess and related religious places and talks. Thanking You, Sandeep. AllDeitiesGodsandGoddessess GoddessBhoomiDevi GoddessDurga GoddessGanga goddessgayatri GoddessKali GoddessPadmavathi GoddessParvathi GoddessSanthoshiMaa GoddessSaraswathi GoddessSriLakshmi GoddessVaishnoDevi LordAyyappa LordBrahma LordDattatreya LordKumara LordNarasimha LordRama LordShivaShankara LordSriKrishna LordVenkateshwara LordVinayaka LordVishnu SriHanuman SriSaiBabaofShirdi sweta kamboj <sweta_kamboj wrote: Hello Friends, I request the moderator of this group to kindly add a new member to this group. The name is Pankaj and his email id is pani22 Sai Ram Sweta Sandeep Kodali <doktersandy wrote: Hello Members, I have a doubt regarding Goddess Lakshmi Devi, the Divine Consort of Lord Vishnu. The most popular version is that Goddess Lakshmi is the Daughter of Lord of the Ocean of Milk, i.e., She is Ksheerabdi Kanya. But I also heard that she is the Daughter of Sage Bhrigu and hence she is also called Bhargavi. I never heard this version and I got confused. Please clear this doubt of mine. I only know that Goddess Lakshmi is the Daughter of Lord of Ocean of Milk. How and when was She born as the Daughter of Sage Bhrigu? Please tell me this story. Thank You, Sandeep. India Matrimony: Find your partner online. Sponsor Links ShriSaiSatcharitra/ ShriSaiSatcharitra India Matrimony: Find your partner online. India Matrimony: Find your partner online. / b.. c.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2004 Report Share Posted May 20, 2004 The reason for objecting is this: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hooter The word is used in a sense of "Vulgar slang". The dictionary link above can be referred to confirm this. Hence my question of "is there a **need** for such a usage". Such vulgar slang was used in the past in the list and I did not(and will not) care about that. Here it is addressed to devatas, which is why, I raised an objection. Devata, Guru and mantra are one and the same? So it is alright to refer to someone equal to one's Guru by such words? Will someone feel comfortable to refer to their Guru like that? , sankara menon <kochu1tz> wrote: > Dear all: > > I come from a religion which says all paths lead Godward. So IMHO no one can say this or that or that is wrong or correct. > > If you do not like something ignore it. If it is a tecnical issue give your opinion. It may or may not find support. But we are not intolerent. > > IMHO the reality of each person is different from that of others. Each live in a world of his own. > > The group is intended to give expression to all views. > > As you know, Nikhilism is also recognised as a path in Hinduism. So why bother about these things? > Lets go on with our journey while listening to other views also. > > "N. Madasamy" <ashwini_puralasamy> wrote: > kalipadma wrote "I'm very impure. Tamasic to the bone. I collect purient nude photos of baby Ganesha, like on that book by Cartwright. And naked shots of Chamunda Kali, with the hooters that hang down to her knees" > > Satish :Is there a need to talk about forms of Devi like this? I request you to refrain from writing about Devi like this.This is in poor taste." > > I dont think so this is in poor taste, Satish. Gosh! I know a personal friend who considers Ganesha as his "guru" called him The Fat boy. And many other names you will be shock to hear. But he is passionate about HIM. > > Let the moderators decided what is inappropriate and what is not, and we will act accordingly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2004 Report Share Posted May 20, 2004 "Will someone feel comfortable to refer to their Guru like that?' Maybe for you it is not, but to some they are and as long as they are we shall leave it as it is. Like Kochu said, if you dont like, just ignore it. Each have their own interpretation. As far as this group is concern we are what we are. Accept us as what we are or please ignore us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2004 Report Share Posted May 20, 2004 I agree, they are many ways to the truth and the Tantric teachings are filled the many ways and interpretation. I even read that in Tantra anything goes (maybe this might contested but hey! who are you to contest this?). Usually you will find someone with orthodox views and I guess its ok if we could all respect each other points of view and interpretation. But when it gets to the point where someone wants to tell others how to talk, walk, breath, and even how to worship God then watch out you have trouble coming. --- "N. Madasamy" <ashwini_puralasamy wrote: > "Will someone feel comfortable to refer to their > Guru like that?' > > Maybe for you it is not, but to some they are and as > long as they are > we shall leave it as it is. Like Kochu said, if you > dont like, just > ignore it. Each have their own interpretation. As > far as this group > is concern we are what we are. Accept us as what we > are or please > ignore us. > > > Domains – Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions./offer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2004 Report Share Posted May 20, 2004 It is true that religions are interlink but the assumption here that you have made is that I am ignorant. Attacks on usage of language on beliefs and different perspective is what leads to conflicts. What is so vulgar? --- Satish Arigela <satisharigela wrote: > , Jose Rosa > <master4114> > wrote: > > Usually you will find someone with orthodox views > and > > I guess its ok if we could all respect each other > > points of view and interpretation. But when it > gets > > to the point where someone wants to tell others > how to > > talk, walk, breath, and even how to worship God > then > > watch out you have trouble coming. > > > There is nothing wrong in making a request to stop > usage of vulgar > language. One doesnt need to think spiritually about > this issue. > I am not telling him what to do and what not to do. > > As I said, all teachings of any religion might be > interlinked > (especially so in hinduism). If one is following > selectively, they > will miss the whole point of the practice and end up > no where. If > one is a christian it is good to follow in total > what they preach. > Likewise for muslim or hindu or whatever religion. > > If you are under the impression that there are no > rules in tantra > and hindusim, you are seriously mistaken. > > Rgds > > Domains – Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions./offer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2004 Report Share Posted May 20, 2004 On Thu, 20 May 2004 08:46:53 -0500 "Detective_Mongo_Phd" writes: > If someone needs to talk about two of these deities in one sentence > which group will they join? Will they have to cross post? I'm > sorry but this monopoly on Hinduism is offensive to me. Exactly! And there isn't enough traffic to maintain so many different lists. I am more into synthesis than analysis. There are many deities, but in approaching Advaita I prefer to explore how each is a manifestation of the one Brahman. And the insistance of "purity" (and a consequential rejection of what some "authority" has judged "impure") is a real turn-off to me. Tantra is "impure." Sexuality is "impure." Householders are "impure." The lower castes are "impure." Humor is "impure." Well, not in the universe as *I* perceive it. Didn't Shree Ramakrishna perform a ritual for his <chelas> where he touched his tongue to sandal powder, and then to his own excrement, and said, "All is Brahman"? -- Len/ Kalipadma > - > Sandeep Kodali > > Hi, > Please do join the following groups dedicated to various Gods and > Goddessess, owned by me. Please do bring all your relatives and > friends and tell them about these groups and request to join them. > But please keep the purtiy of these groups with no obscene or vulgar > photos, talks etc. These grouos are purely dedicated to Vedic and > Holy discussions and with the respective God and Goddessess and > related religious places and talks. > Thanking You, > Sandeep. > > > AllDeitiesGodsandGoddessess > > GoddessBhoomiDevi > > GoddessDurga > > GoddessGanga > > goddessgayatri > > GoddessKali > > GoddessPadmavathi > > GoddessParvathi > > GoddessSanthoshiMaa > > GoddessSaraswathi > > GoddessSriLakshmi > > GoddessVaishnoDevi > > LordAyyappa > > LordBrahma > > LordDattatreya > > LordKumara > > LordNarasimha > > LordRama > > LordShivaShankara > > LordSriKrishna > > LordVenkateshwara > > LordVinayaka > > LordVishnu > > SriHanuman > > SriSaiBabaofShirdi > > ______________ The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2004 Report Share Posted May 20, 2004 , Jose Rosa <master4114> wrote: > > It is true that religions are interlink but the > assumption here that you have made is that I am > ignorant. > > Attacks on usage of language on beliefs and different > perspective is what leads to conflicts. > > What is so vulgar? Attack? You call the sentence "I request you to refrain from using such language to talk about Devi...", an attack? I fail to see how a request is seen as an attack? Beliefs and interpretations: Ex:If somebody wrongly says hinduism preaches cannabalism(just let us assume somebody says that- due to either being misinformed or due to misunderstanding some passage). What is wrong with showing appropriate quotes from scriptures and showing that hindusim doesnt preach cannibalism? Why shud that be viewed as an attack on somebody's belief? When somebody says hinduism is such and such, if I happen to see something opposite, I will ask ppl to give refs for their beleifs and I will provide refs to show my viewpoint. Why shud this be viewed as a war or a personal attack? If I found myself mistaken, I am wrong and will change(or atleast try to change). If they are wrong, they are. As simple as that. Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2004 Report Share Posted May 20, 2004 , kalipadma@j... wrote: > And the insistance of "purity" (and a consequential rejection of >what > some "authority" has judged "impure") is a real turn-off to me. I dont think insistence on purity is really a turn off for anyone. If it is really so, then why do people take a shower, or clean themselves? Arent these all acts of purity? Is it that we insist purity when it comes to things which make us uncomfortable, and purity is a turn off when it is introduced as part of a spiritual discipline, because it isnt quite comfortable to follow? Like material purity,-- spiritual purity, till a certain stage. Some authorities judging impure/unfit: Ex: Shri Sankara Menon says Tulasi should not be used for Navavarana puja(he said it can be used of LS archana though). I dont know what to say if somebody finds the above prohibition a turn-off. If they find it so, then Navavarana puja is not for them (atleast as they do it in that tradition). Likewise the process of sadhana in Hinduism/Shaktism has its own rules. If they dont like them, it is a good idea to follow another path which is more appealing. > Tantra is "impure." Sexuality is "impure." Householders are "impure." > The lower castes are "impure." Humor is "impure." Am not aware of a single tantra which says any of the above. Even vedic traditions dont say most of those above are impure. >Well, not in the > universe as *I* perceive it. Didn't Shree Ramakrishna perform a ritual > for his <chelas> where he touched his tongue to sandal powder, and then > to his own excrement, and said, "All is Brahman"? This is exactly what I meant when I said there are kaulikottamas, and trying to imitate them is a dangerous thing. One doesnt need to think mystically/spiritually to see how dangerous the above act is. From a simple standpoint of hygiene such practice is unhealthy. Performing the above act(like Sri Ramakrishna did) doesnt make one realise "All is Brahman". It will only make them unhealthy. Ramakrishna Paramahamsa did that act because he realised "All is Brahman". As a tantra is once quoted "A vira is one who attained mantra siddhi. Drinking of wine doesnt make a vira". Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2006 Report Share Posted August 31, 2006 This question may not be relevent to this group. I am looking for 16 forms of ganapathi i.e shodasha ganapathi along with its meaning and mantra. I have vague understanding but would like to find more. raji. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2006 Report Share Posted August 31, 2006 hi, can yuo please let me know about the other way. On 8/31/06, abhi ram <ssabhiram > wrote: > > hi. > > I am Abhi from kerala. I also got ur messge seeking abt > shodasa ganapathi. But i hve no idea about that. > However, being an upasaka i hve the duty to pass the > Knowledge to every one. So i 'm sending u the thing > what i hve. ok! Actually ganapathi upasana is a basic > level of upasana. or in another way, the first step of > attaining the shakthi from Universal mother. Ganapathi > is situated in the Mooladhara chakra. ie, the place > between genital and anus. By vibrating this point, we > will get the more shakthi in physical, mental and > spiritual level. same way we get creative power also. > Hence ganesha is called sarva vighna vinashaka...To > activate Mooladhara chakra, we can chant moolamantra, > and by doing certain mudras, bandhas and locks, and by > some certain yogic postures.. However, there is > another way which very common and doing all people , > but without aware of it. That is very easy and in > physical Level... if u want to knw more abt plz > message me ....ok tke care byee.. > > Om sri matre namah > With Love only-Abhi > > --- rajeshwari iyer <rajii31 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com <rajii31%40hotmail.com>> wrote: > > > This question may not be relevent to this group. I > > am looking for 16 forms > > of ganapathi i.e shodasha ganapathi along with its > > meaning and mantra. I > > have vague understanding but would like to find > > more. raji. > > > -- Dear Sir, With best regards, V.Rajnikanth yogior , yogi_or (AT) (DOT) co.in, yogi_or (AT) sify (DOT) com Mobile : 91 44 9444126639(India),0044 07960234686(London) Landline : 91 44 26575384,91 44 26572214, efax :17734396237 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2006 Report Share Posted September 1, 2006 For your question There are thirty two forms of Ganapati listed in a wide varity of sources and they are fairly in correspondence with one another. Under the head Shodasa Ganapathi and 16 ganapatis a listing and the pictorial images is available at www.nyganeshtemple.com and www.Agasthiar.com The latter has the corresponding Thithis mentioned against each form, A summary of both these listings is as follows f rom among these forms . Tithi www.agasthiar.com www.nyganeshtemple.com 0/16 Sri Nritta Ganapati Oordhwa Ganapati 1 Bala Ganapati Bala Ganapathi 2 TharunaGanapathi Taruna Ganapathi 3 Bakthi Ganapathi Bhakti Ganapathi 4 Veera Ganapathi Sri Veera Ganapathi 5 Sakthi Ganapathi Sri Sakthi Ganapathi 6 Dhvija Ganapathi Dwaja Ganapathi 7 Siddhi Ganapathi Siddi Ganapathi 8 UcchishtaGanapathi Ucchista Ganapati 9 Vigna Ganapathi Vignaraja Ganapathi 10 Kshipra Ganapathi Kshipra Ganapathi 11 HerambaGanapathi Heramba Ganapathi 12 Lakshmi Ganapathi Sristhi Ganapathi 13 Maha Ganapathi Mahaganapathi 14 Vijaya Ganapathi BhuvaneshaGanapathi 15 Niruttha Ganapathi Nritta Ganapathi • The Meanings are well documented for initial understanding at http://www.samachar.com/religion/ganesh.html. The images for the listing at www.nyganeshtemple.com are under their tittle Publications and either images or slideshow Should I be able to compile yantra, mantra and image I will post it sometime rajeshwari iyer <rajii31 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: This question may not be relevent to this group. I am looking for 16 forms of ganapathi i.e shodasha ganapathi along with its meaning and mantra. I have vague understanding but would like to find more. raji. Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2006 Report Share Posted September 3, 2006 Dear Sriram tenneti, Thanks for your mail. The list of ganapathy that your have mentioned is similar to what I heard. The site that you recommended does not give information but agasthiar is a publishing site - I shall try to get some books for that site. Infuture - if you have more information then please let me know. Thanks once again. raji. > >For your question > There are thirty two forms of Ganapati listed in a wide varity of >sources and they are fairly in correspondence with one another. > >Under the head Shodasa Ganapathi and 16 ganapatis a listing and the >pictorial images is available at www.nyganeshtemple.com and >www.Agasthiar.com > > The latter has the corresponding Thithis mentioned against each form, > A summary of both these listings is as follows f rom among these forms . > Tithi > www.agasthiar.com > www.nyganeshtemple.com > > 0/16 > Sri Nritta Ganapati > Oordhwa Ganapati > 1 > Bala Ganapati > Bala Ganapathi > 2 > TharunaGanapathi > Taruna Ganapathi > 3 > Bakthi Ganapathi > Bhakti Ganapathi > 4 > Veera Ganapathi > Sri Veera Ganapathi > 5 > Sakthi Ganapathi > Sri Sakthi Ganapathi > 6 > Dhvija Ganapathi > Dwaja Ganapathi > 7 > Siddhi Ganapathi > Siddi Ganapathi > 8 > UcchishtaGanapathi > Ucchista Ganapati > 9 > Vigna Ganapathi > Vignaraja Ganapathi > 10 > Kshipra Ganapathi > Kshipra Ganapathi > 11 > HerambaGanapathi > Heramba Ganapathi > 12 > Lakshmi Ganapathi > Sristhi Ganapathi > 13 > Maha Ganapathi > Mahaganapathi > 14 > Vijaya Ganapathi > BhuvaneshaGanapathi > 15 > Niruttha Ganapathi > Nritta Ganapathi > > • The Meanings are well documented for initial understanding at >http://www.samachar.com/religion/ganesh.html. > > The images for the listing at www.nyganeshtemple.com are under their >tittle Publications and either images or slideshow > > Should I be able to compile yantra, mantra and image I will post it >sometime > > > > rajeshwari iyer <rajii31 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: > This question may not be relevent to this group. I am looking >for 16 forms >of ganapathi i.e shodasha ganapathi along with its meaning and mantra. I >have vague understanding but would like to find more. raji. > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. >Get it NOW > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.