Guest guest Report post Posted October 19, 2004 - "Tony OClery" <aoclery <advaitin> Monday, October 18, 2004 3:58 PM Advaita and Dvaita. > > Namaste All, > > Maharaj said this below and even Ramana has indicated the same > result. My question is 'Why do so many Ramana sites go directly to > the general Bhakti dualistic teaching instead of his higher > teaching?' I know one could say because of Bhakti, but then why > choose Ramana and worship him when there are plenty of dualistic > figures around? Even believing that Ramana is somehow in the Astal > helping them. I find this fascinating that so called non dualitst do > this. Can anyone add to my comments.........ONS..Tony. ******************************* Dearest Tony, You are so funny! Have you not heard that Sri Ramana himself was a Bhakta. Have you read hymns to Arunachala? 9. After abducting me, if now thou dost not embrace me, where is Thy Chivalry, O' Arunachala? (from "A Marital Garland of Letters for Sri Arunachala"). There is no difference between Pure Jnana and Pure Bhakti. Jnanis enjoy bhakti and stories of bhaktas. Bhagavan would sometimes actually start weeping when he read stories of bhaktas from the scriptures. Love to all Harsha Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
