The philosophy of Advaita Vedanta says that Brahman is indescribable (neti neti). Bhagavad gita describes the abode of Krishna as non-dual but purely spiritual (Spiritual world/ Goloka). But by the very definition of "neti neti" shouldn't non duality be considered as neither material nor spiritual?
Is Brahman neither Spiritual nor Material?
in Advaita Vedanta
Posted
The philosophy of Advaita Vedanta says that Brahman is indescribable (neti neti). Bhagavad gita describes the abode of Krishna as non-dual but purely spiritual (Spiritual world/ Goloka). But by the very definition of "neti neti" shouldn't non duality be considered as neither material nor spiritual?