I can see that the living being when considered in material position is called false ego. (yes?)
I'm not sure how the living being is being called when in spiritual position; is it sat-chit-ananda?
ww.freeimagehosting.net/image.php?4610ab8779.gif
Hi,
I find a good website:)
danyavaads already mentioned that She is hladini-shakti, beyond the 3 modes of material nature...What about sat and chit? Is She also sat and chit?
Regards
Dear Bart Happel,
Please accept my apologies for anything you may have found offensive in this thread from me by now.
Sorry for not replying you in a much better way...
Regards, afun
Hi,
1.) Is Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī rajas or tamas guna?
2.) Is Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī aparā-prakṛti (māyā)? 8 elements (gross+subtle) or 5 elements (gross)?
Regards
Why 3? Why not start with 2?
Can't we generate all other colours from just 2 basic colours?
( ttp://answers./question/index?qid=20060627172002AABv2xT, etc.)
Regards
The fourth state is samadhi.
And there are two definitions of samadhi:
- Impersonalists definition of samadhi and
- Personalists definition of samadhi.
And the interpretation of samadhi is the arguing topic between Advaitins and Dvaitins (Achintya-Bheda-Abheda for example).
Is this correct?
Thank you for replies.
Is it correct to say that the first three states (waking state, dream state, deep sleep state) are considered material and the forth state (turiya) is spiritual/transcendental)?