Shani ko Adhoora Chhoda

Respected Members,

 

Jaisa ki aap sab jante hai ki lal kitab mein jikar aata hai ki

SHANI KHANA NUMBER 2 KEY SAMAY MAKAAN(SHANI) JAISA BANE BAN NE DEY.MUBARAK

HOGA.yani ki beech mein construction nahi rokni.

iska prabhaw hamay LAL KITAB 1952 KA LIPAYANTAR mein dekhne ko

mila.14 december 2009 ko part 1 aa gya tha aur announce kiya gya tha ki jan 2010

tak doosra part aa jaye ga.magar 26 march tak bi doosra part mukammal nahi ho

saka.

Karan sapasht hai pehla part shani 2 tak likha gya.shani

ko adhoora chhoda.yahan par b shani apna asar dikha gya.ab dekhte hai shani kab

nek hoga.

pujya pundit ji ney lal kitab 1952 ko ek hi part mein

likha,magar yahan aaj is kitab ko 2 part mein chhapne ka maqsad kya hai yeh to

pramatma hi jane.kehte hai jaisi niyat waisi murad.niyat nek to phal nek.

yadi yeh lipayantar hai to is kitab ko bilkul waise hi ek part mein

kyo nahi likha gya.

sabse badi baat gaur karne layak yeh hai ki yadi yeh publisher

par apna asar dikha sakti hai to jiske pass hogi ya jo isey do adhoore ko

samjhne ya parne ki koshish karega kya use nek asar mil sakta hai.ab yadi koi

apni samajh sey 2 part kar dey to kya asar hoga parne walon par aur kitab ki

trading karne walon par.

 

With Regards

 

Kunwar Vishal

Kunwar sahib;

How

can you equate a book with construction of a house.

 

KISS(e)

PUCHAYA MAJNU NU - OYE TERI LAILA DISDI KAALI E;

MANJU

SUN KE JHAT KURLAYA - OYE TERI AKKH NA DEKHAN WAALI E;

WARQ

VED, QURAN DE NE CHITTE - VICH SHAHI(syahi) RAKH DITTI KAALI VE;

JITHE

AKHIYAN JA LAGIYAN OTHE -KYA GORI KYA KAALI VE.

 

as

per my knowledge. Pt. Beni Madhav Goswami Ji's family is alright, hale and hearty

and prospering.

He

is content and has been benefited a lot .

BUT

Be forewarned you are creating be - sir pair ke waham.?

 

Regards

Kulbir

Bains.On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:44 AM, vishalastrologer <vishalastrologer wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Respected Members,

Jaisa ki aap sab jante hai ki lal kitab mein jikar aata hai ki SHANI KHANA NUMBER 2 KEY SAMAY MAKAAN(SHANI) JAISA BANE BAN NE DEY.MUBARAK HOGA.yani ki beech mein construction nahi rokni.

iska prabhaw hamay LAL KITAB 1952 KA LIPAYANTAR mein dekhne ko mila.14 december 2009 ko part 1 aa gya tha aur announce kiya gya tha ki jan 2010 tak doosra part aa jaye ga.magar 26 march tak bi doosra part mukammal nahi ho saka.

Karan sapasht hai pehla part shani 2 tak likha gya.shani ko adhoora chhoda.yahan par b shani apna asar dikha gya.ab dekhte hai shani kab nek hoga.

pujya pundit ji ney lal kitab 1952 ko ek hi part mein

likha,magar yahan aaj is kitab ko 2 part mein chhapne ka maqsad kya hai yeh to pramatma hi jane.kehte hai jaisi niyat waisi murad.niyat nek to phal nek.

yadi yeh lipayantar hai to is kitab ko bilkul waise hi ek part mein kyo nahi likha gya.

sabse badi baat gaur karne layak yeh hai ki yadi yeh publisher par apna asar dikha sakti hai to jiske pass hogi ya jo isey do adhoore ko samjhne ya parne ki koshish karega kya use nek asar mil sakta hai.yadi pundit ji ney iski jild(binding par lal rang ka nek asar mana hai)to iska saaf matlab hai is kitab key shabad gaibi hai na ki kisi insaan key dimaag ki apni upaj.ab yadi koi apni samajh sey 2 part kar dey to kya asar hoga parne walon par aur kitab ki trading karne walon par.

With Regards

Kunwar Vishal

Kunwar sahib; Are you really serious?.How can you equate a book with construction of a house.as per my knowledge. Pt. Beni madhav Ji's family is alright hale and�hearty�and prospering.He is content and has been�benefited.

BUT�Be forewarned you are creating be - sir pair ke waham.�regardsKulbir Bains.On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:45 AM, vishalastrologer <vishalastrologer wrote:

 

 

�

 

 

 

Respected Members,

 

Jaisa ki aap sab jante hai ki lal kitab mein jikar aata hai ki SHANI KHANA NUMBER 2 KEY SAMAY MAKAAN(SHANI) JAISA BANE BAN NE DEY.MUBARAK HOGA.yani ki beech mein construction nahi rokni.

iska prabhaw hamay LAL KITAB 1952 KA LIPAYANTAR mein dekhne ko mila.14 december 2009 ko part 1 aa gya tha aur announce kiya gya tha ki jan 2010 tak doosra part aa jaye ga.magar 26 march tak bi doosra part mukammal nahi ho saka.

Karan sapasht hai pehla part shani 2 tak likha gya.shani ko adhoora chhoda.yahan par b shani apna asar dikha gya.ab dekhte hai shani kab nek hoga.

pujya pundit ji ney lal kitab 1952 ko ek hi part mein

likha,magar yahan aaj is kitab ko 2 part mein chhapne ka maqsad kya hai yeh to pramatma hi jane.kehte hai jaisi niyat waisi murad.niyat nek to phal nek.

yadi yeh lipayantar hai to is kitab ko bilkul waise hi ek part mein kyo nahi likha gya.

sabse badi baat gaur karne layak yeh hai ki yadi yeh publisher par apna asar dikha sakti hai to jiske pass hogi ya jo isey do adhoore ko samjhne ya parne ki koshish karega kya use nek asar mil sakta hai.ab yadi koi apni samajh sey 2 part kar dey to kya asar hoga parne walon par aur kitab ki trading karne walon par.

 

With Regards

 

Kunwar Vishal

Respected Vishal ji,

 

Writing a book or doing the transliteration; getting it printed etc would be an

activity associated with MERCURY and to some extent that of Jupiter.

 

How does Saturn get associated with it?

 

Regards,

 

Varun Trivedi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " vishalastrologer "

<vishalastrologer wrote:

>

> Respected Members,

>

> Jaisa ki aap sab jante hai ki lal kitab mein jikar aata hai

ki SHANI KHANA NUMBER 2 KEY SAMAY MAKAAN(SHANI) JAISA BANE BAN NE DEY.MUBARAK

HOGA.yani ki beech mein construction nahi rokni.

> iska prabhaw hamay LAL KITAB 1952 KA LIPAYANTAR mein dekhne ko

mila.14 december 2009 ko part 1 aa gya tha aur announce kiya gya tha ki jan 2010

tak doosra part aa jaye ga.magar 26 march tak bi doosra part mukammal nahi ho

saka.

> Karan sapasht hai pehla part shani 2 tak likha

gya.shani ko adhoora chhoda.yahan par b shani apna asar dikha gya.ab dekhte hai

shani kab nek hoga.

> pujya pundit ji ney lal kitab 1952 ko ek hi part mein

> likha,magar yahan aaj is kitab ko 2 part mein chhapne ka maqsad kya hai yeh to

pramatma hi jane.kehte hai jaisi niyat waisi murad.niyat nek to phal nek.

> yadi yeh lipayantar hai to is kitab ko bilkul waise hi ek part mein

kyo nahi likha gya.

> sabse badi baat gaur karne layak yeh hai ki yadi yeh

publisher par apna asar dikha sakti hai to jiske pass hogi ya jo isey do adhoore

ko samjhne ya parne ki koshish karega kya use nek asar mil sakta hai.ab yadi koi

apni samajh sey 2 part kar dey to kya asar hoga parne walon par aur kitab ki

trading karne walon par.

>

> With Regards

>

> Kunwar Vishal

>

Respected Vishal ji,

 

Transliteration of the 1952 Lal Kitab edition by Pt. Veni Madhav Goswami, by

far, is the most authentic transliterations.

 

It always takes time to do some job sincerely and meticulously. Pt. Goswami has

done a fantastic job for Part One. If the Part Two has to be equally brilliant,

then it will take time.

 

Those who are the genuine students of the Lal Kitab would never mind a delay to

lay their hands on an authentic version.

 

Regards,

 

Varun Trivedi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " vishalastrologer "

<vishalastrologer wrote:

>

> Respected Members,

>

> Jaisa ki aap sab jante hai ki lal kitab mein jikar aata hai

ki SHANI KHANA NUMBER 2 KEY SAMAY MAKAAN(SHANI) JAISA BANE BAN NE DEY.MUBARAK

HOGA.yani ki beech mein construction nahi rokni.

> iska prabhaw hamay LAL KITAB 1952 KA LIPAYANTAR mein dekhne ko

mila.14 december 2009 ko part 1 aa gya tha aur announce kiya gya tha ki jan 2010

tak doosra part aa jaye ga.magar 26 march tak bi doosra part mukammal nahi ho

saka.

> Karan sapasht hai pehla part shani 2 tak likha

gya.shani ko adhoora chhoda.yahan par b shani apna asar dikha gya.ab dekhte hai

shani kab nek hoga.

> pujya pundit ji ney lal kitab 1952 ko ek hi part mein

> likha,magar yahan aaj is kitab ko 2 part mein chhapne ka maqsad kya hai yeh to

pramatma hi jane.kehte hai jaisi niyat waisi murad.niyat nek to phal nek.

> yadi yeh lipayantar hai to is kitab ko bilkul waise hi ek part mein

kyo nahi likha gya.

> sabse badi baat gaur karne layak yeh hai ki yadi yeh

publisher par apna asar dikha sakti hai to jiske pass hogi ya jo isey do adhoore

ko samjhne ya parne ki koshish karega kya use nek asar mil sakta hai.ab yadi koi

apni samajh sey 2 part kar dey to kya asar hoga parne walon par aur kitab ki

trading karne walon par.

>

> With Regards

>

> Kunwar Vishal

>

Respected Varun ji & kulbir ji,

 

 

varun ji aap ki baat sey 100% sehmat hu.magar meri

baat par bhi gaur farmayen.lal kitab key anusar jo vyakhya de raha hu use jara

gaur sey samjhey.

 

lal kitab kisi ek ya do grahon sey sambandh nahi rakhti.balki 9 hi grah lal

kitab key chhapne wale,trading karne wale aur lal kitab jyotish karne walon se

poori tarah sambandh rakhte hai.jab tak 9 hi grahon ko apni favour mein nahi

honge to is kitab ko samajhne mein kahi na kahi maar kha hi jaye gey.yeh baat

alag hi ki kiski favour mein kitne grah hai.yeh ek gaibi kitab hai aur ise

kharid kar har koi nahi samjh sakta.khareed to sakta hai.jab tak dimag key

khane(budh) hi nahi khule gey to ise kis tarah se samajh sakte hai.pundit gi ney

jis gaibi takat key dwara(rahu favour ki nashani achanak madad) yeh kitab samjhi

aur logon ko gyan banta bina kisi lalach key(bina mangal badh) is sey unko

yash(surya)kitna mila yeh jag jahir hai.yeh unki tarak shakti(mangal nek) thi jo

ki is

gaibi gyan(chander se vidya aur guru gyan ka karak)kitab(budh) ke roop mein

chhapwaya(budh).kitne bimaron ko heal(shukra jise snajivini ka gyan

hai)kiya.iske kale akshar(shani)jinhe ki adhhora(rahu paida karna)chhodna

ketu(chhalawa) ko barawa dena hai.

 

ab varun ji aur kulbir ji aap hi batayen kya kewal budh ya guru sey

lal kitab ka sambandh keh sakte hai.

 

is liye lal kitab chhapna aur samjhna aur iske dwara yash milna

aur daulat milna ya pareshani milna yeh us insaan key grah vishesh sey sambandh

rakhta hai.dhanyawad

 

Aadar sahit

 

Kunwar Vishal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " varun_trvd " <varun_trvd wrote:

>

> Respected Vishal ji,

>

> Writing a book or doing the transliteration; getting it printed etc would be

an activity associated with MERCURY and to some extent that of Jupiter.

>

> How does Saturn get associated with it?

>

> Regards,

>

> Varun Trivedi

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

, " vishalastrologer "

<vishalastrologer@> wrote:

> >

> > Respected Members,

> >

> > Jaisa ki aap sab jante hai ki lal kitab mein jikar aata

hai ki SHANI KHANA NUMBER 2 KEY SAMAY MAKAAN(SHANI) JAISA BANE BAN NE

DEY.MUBARAK HOGA.yani ki beech mein construction nahi rokni.

> > iska prabhaw hamay LAL KITAB 1952 KA LIPAYANTAR mein dekhne ko

mila.14 december 2009 ko part 1 aa gya tha aur announce kiya gya tha ki jan 2010

tak doosra part aa jaye ga.magar 26 march tak bi doosra part mukammal nahi ho

saka.

> > Karan sapasht hai pehla part shani 2 tak likha

gya.shani ko adhoora chhoda.yahan par b shani apna asar dikha gya.ab dekhte hai

shani kab nek hoga.

> > pujya pundit ji ney lal kitab 1952 ko ek hi part mein

> > likha,magar yahan aaj is kitab ko 2 part mein chhapne ka maqsad kya hai yeh

to pramatma hi jane.kehte hai jaisi niyat waisi murad.niyat nek to phal nek.

> > yadi yeh lipayantar hai to is kitab ko bilkul waise hi ek part

mein kyo nahi likha gya.

> > sabse badi baat gaur karne layak yeh hai ki yadi yeh

publisher par apna asar dikha sakti hai to jiske pass hogi ya jo isey do adhoore

ko samjhne ya parne ki koshish karega kya use nek asar mil sakta hai.ab yadi koi

apni samajh sey 2 part kar dey to kya asar hoga parne walon par aur kitab ki

trading karne walon par.

> >

> > With Regards

> >

> > Kunwar Vishal

> >

>

Res Vishal Ji

Pt.Ribhukant Goswami Ji s/o Pt. Benimadhav goswami ji ne kuchh samay pehley hee

mujhse Lk1952 ke 2nd volume ke tayyar hone ka jikra kiya tha, hum sabhi yah

jaantey hain ki Pt. Benimadhav ji ke dwara lipyantrit aur published

LalKitab-series abhi tak ki sarvshreshtha pustakon ka sangrah hai. lekin yah ek

aisa kaam hai jo ki samay aur lagan aur laagat teeno ka mila julaa roop hai.

Vishal ji is prakar ke karyaa ko jaldbaazi main karnaa ek bhool hogi aur aise

main ham sabhi ka farz yah hona chahiye ki chand shabdon se mutalliq shaks ki

haunsla afzayee karain taaki vah dogune josh aur lagan se is mubarik kaam ko

poora karey.Rahi baat kisi ke maksad ki - Is duniyaan main bina maksad to

keet-patangey bhi apni jagah se nahi hiltey fir manushya jaati ki to baat hee

kyaa.

 

bhogi ko swaad ,

sadhu ko samaadh, mulla ko namaaz,

panchhi ko parvaaz ,sahukaar ko byaaz,

lekhak ko khyaal ,aatanki ko babaal,

vidyaarthi ko sawaal,nartaki ko taal

kalaal ko kalaali,dalaal ko dalaali.

 

aur na jaaney kyaa kyaa aur kis kis tarah ke maksad hain is duniyaan se us

duniyaan tak ke safar main.Kisi ke maksad se kyaa lenaa hai,aapka aur hamaraa

maksad hai sirf Lalkitab 1952 ka abhi tak ka shuddhtam lipyanar aur uskeliye

hamain Pt. Benimadhav Goswami ji ki taraf mukhatib hokar aur shukarguzar hokar

2nd volume ke istaqbaal ke liye tayyar rehnaa chahiye.

With Regards

Pt.Lalkitabee

V.Shukla

, " varun_trvd " <varun_trvd wrote:

>

> Respected Vishal ji,

>

> Transliteration of the 1952 Lal Kitab edition by Pt. Veni Madhav Goswami, by

far, is the most authentic transliterations.

>

> It always takes time to do some job sincerely and meticulously. Pt. Goswami

has done a fantastic job for Part One. If the Part Two has to be equally

brilliant, then it will take time.

>

> Those who are the genuine students of the Lal Kitab would never mind a delay

to lay their hands on an authentic version.

>

> Regards,

>

> Varun Trivedi

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

, " vishalastrologer "

<vishalastrologer@> wrote:

> >

> > Respected Members,

> >

> > Jaisa ki aap sab jante hai ki lal kitab mein jikar aata

hai ki SHANI KHANA NUMBER 2 KEY SAMAY MAKAAN(SHANI) JAISA BANE BAN NE

DEY.MUBARAK HOGA.yani ki beech mein construction nahi rokni.

> > iska prabhaw hamay LAL KITAB 1952 KA LIPAYANTAR mein dekhne ko

mila.14 december 2009 ko part 1 aa gya tha aur announce kiya gya tha ki jan 2010

tak doosra part aa jaye ga.magar 26 march tak bi doosra part mukammal nahi ho

saka.

> > Karan sapasht hai pehla part shani 2 tak likha

gya.shani ko adhoora chhoda.yahan par b shani apna asar dikha gya.ab dekhte hai

shani kab nek hoga.

> > pujya pundit ji ney lal kitab 1952 ko ek hi part mein

> > likha,magar yahan aaj is kitab ko 2 part mein chhapne ka maqsad kya hai yeh

to pramatma hi jane.kehte hai jaisi niyat waisi murad.niyat nek to phal nek.

> > yadi yeh lipayantar hai to is kitab ko bilkul waise hi ek part

mein kyo nahi likha gya.

> > sabse badi baat gaur karne layak yeh hai ki yadi yeh

publisher par apna asar dikha sakti hai to jiske pass hogi ya jo isey do adhoore

ko samjhne ya parne ki koshish karega kya use nek asar mil sakta hai.ab yadi koi

apni samajh sey 2 part kar dey to kya asar hoga parne walon par aur kitab ki

trading karne walon par.

> >

> > With Regards

> >

> > Kunwar Vishal

> >

>

Respected Vishal ji,

You have said:

iske kale akshar(shani)jinhe ki adhhora(rahu paida karna)chhodna ketu(chhalawa) ko barawa dena hai.

'adhoora chhodna' means giving up.

Pt. Goswami never gave up the transliteration work. He had already finished transliterating the book. The delay might have been in getting part 2 printed etc. Such delays are normal and beyond Pt. Goswami ji's efforts.

Since Ribhukant ji has already announced that the book is ready, the matter ends.

Regards,

Varun Trivedi

 

 

 

 

, "vishalastrologer" <vishalastrologer wrote:>> Respected Varun ji & kulbir ji,> > > varun ji aap ki baat sey 100% sehmat hu.magar meri baat par bhi gaur farmayen.lal kitab key anusar jo vyakhya de raha hu use jara gaur sey samjhey.> > lal kitab kisi ek ya do grahon sey sambandh nahi rakhti.balki 9 hi grah lal kitab key chhapne wale,trading karne wale aur lal kitab jyotish karne walon se poori tarah sambandh rakhte hai.jab tak 9 hi grahon ko apni favour mein nahi honge to is kitab ko samajhne mein kahi na kahi maar kha hi jaye gey.yeh baat alag hi ki kiski favour mein kitne grah hai.yeh ek gaibi kitab hai aur ise kharid kar har koi nahi samjh sakta.khareed to sakta hai.jab tak dimag key khane(budh) hi nahi khule gey to ise kis tarah se samajh sakte hai.pundit gi ney jis gaibi takat key dwara(rahu favour ki nashani achanak madad) yeh kitab samjhi aur logon ko gyan banta bina kisi lalach key(bina mangal badh) is sey unko yash(surya)kitna mila yeh jag jahir hai.yeh unki tarak shakti(mangal nek) thi jo ki is> gaibi gyan(chander se vidya aur guru gyan ka karak)kitab(budh) ke roop mein chhapwaya(budh).kitne bimaron ko heal(shukra jise snajivini ka gyan hai)kiya.iske kale akshar(shani)jinhe ki adhhora(rahu paida karna)chhodna ketu(chhalawa) ko barawa dena hai.> > ab varun ji aur kulbir ji aap hi batayen kya kewal budh ya guru sey lal kitab ka sambandh keh sakte hai.> > is liye lal kitab chhapna aur samjhna aur iske dwara yash milna aur daulat milna ya pareshani milna yeh us insaan key grah vishesh sey sambandh rakhta hai.dhanyawad> > Aadar sahit> > Kunwar Vishal> > > > > > > > > > > , "varun_trvd" varun_trvd@ wrote:> >> > Respected Vishal ji,> >> > Writing a book or doing the transliteration; getting it printed etc would be an activity associated with MERCURY and to some extent that of Jupiter.> >> > How does Saturn get associated with it?> >> > Regards,> >> > Varun Trivedi> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > , "vishalastrologer" <vishalastrologer@> wrote:> > >> > > Respected Members,> > >> > > Jaisa ki aap sab jante hai ki lal kitab mein jikar aata hai ki SHANI KHANA NUMBER 2 KEY SAMAY MAKAAN(SHANI) JAISA BANE BAN NE DEY.MUBARAK HOGA.yani ki beech mein construction nahi rokni.> > > iska prabhaw hamay LAL KITAB 1952 KA LIPAYANTAR mein dekhne ko mila.14 december 2009 ko part 1 aa gya tha aur announce kiya gya tha ki jan 2010 tak doosra part aa jaye ga.magar 26 march tak bi doosra part mukammal nahi ho saka.> > > Karan sapasht hai pehla part shani 2 tak likha gya.shani ko adhoora chhoda.yahan par b shani apna asar dikha gya.ab dekhte hai shani kab nek hoga.> > > pujya pundit ji ney lal kitab 1952 ko ek hi part mein> > > likha,magar yahan aaj is kitab ko 2 part mein chhapne ka maqsad kya hai yeh to pramatma hi jane.kehte hai jaisi niyat waisi murad.niyat nek to phal nek.> > > yadi yeh lipayantar hai to is kitab ko bilkul waise hi ek part mein kyo nahi likha gya.> > > sabse badi baat gaur karne layak yeh hai ki yadi yeh publisher par apna asar dikha sakti hai to jiske pass hogi ya jo isey do adhoore ko samjhne ya parne ki koshish karega kya use nek asar mil sakta hai.ab yadi koi apni samajh sey 2 part kar dey to kya asar hoga parne walon par aur kitab ki trading karne walon par.> > >> > > With Regards> > >> > > Kunwar Vishal> > >> >>

Kunwar Sahib,//jab tak 9 hi grahon ko apni favour mein nahi honge to is kitab ko samajhne mein kahi na kahi maar kha hi jaye gey.//Bhai ji 9 ke 9 grah to Ravan bhi apne favour mein na kar saka. Matlab na 9 mann tel hoga na rAAdha ji naachengi.?

//pundit gi ney jis gaibi takat key dwara(rahu favour ki nashani achanak madad)�yeh kitab samjhi aur....//Bhai ji yeh aapko kis Gaibi taaqat ne bata diya?//tarak shakti(mangal nek)// Accha ji tarak shakti = mangal nek chalo nayi bat pata chali MMeharbAAni.

//.iske kale akshar(shani)jinhe ki adhhora(rahu paida karna)chhodna ketu(chhalawa) ko barawa dena hai.//Bhai ji pehli aur is statement mein koi contradiction ni dikhati aapko.

yAAr inne bande ho style tan badal ke likh daya karo.AAdAArsAAhit.Kulbir Bains.On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:03 PM, vishalastrologer <vishalastrologer wrote:

 

 

�

 

 

 

Respected Varun ji & kulbir ji,

 

varun ji aap ki baat sey 100% sehmat hu.magar meri baat par bhi gaur farmayen.lal kitab key anusar jo vyakhya de raha hu use jara gaur sey samjhey.

 

lal kitab kisi ek ya do grahon sey sambandh nahi rakhti.balki 9 hi grah lal kitab key chhapne wale,trading karne wale aur lal kitab jyotish karne walon se poori tarah sambandh rakhte hai.jab tak 9 hi grahon ko apni favour mein nahi honge to is kitab ko samajhne mein kahi na kahi maar kha hi jaye gey.yeh baat alag hi ki kiski favour mein kitne grah hai.yeh ek gaibi kitab hai aur ise kharid kar har koi nahi samjh sakta.khareed to sakta hai.jab tak dimag key khane(budh) hi nahi khule gey to ise kis tarah se samajh sakte hai.pundit gi ney jis gaibi takat key dwara(rahu favour ki nashani achanak madad) yeh kitab samjhi aur logon ko gyan banta bina kisi lalach key(bina mangal badh) is sey unko yash(surya)kitna mila yeh jag jahir hai.yeh unki tarak shakti(mangal nek) thi jo ki is

gaibi gyan(chander se vidya aur guru gyan ka karak)kitab(budh) ke roop mein chhapwaya(budh).kitne bimaron ko heal(shukra jise snajivini ka gyan hai)kiya.iske kale akshar(shani)jinhe ki adhhora(rahu paida karna)chhodna ketu(chhalawa) ko barawa dena hai.

 

ab varun ji aur kulbir ji aap hi batayen kya kewal budh ya guru sey lal kitab ka sambandh keh sakte hai.

 

is liye lal kitab chhapna aur samjhna aur iske dwara yash milna aur daulat milna ya pareshani milna yeh us insaan key grah vishesh sey sambandh rakhta hai.dhanyawad

 

Aadar sahit

 

Kunwar Vishal

 

, " varun_trvd " <varun_trvd wrote:

>

> Respected Vishal ji,

>

> Writing a book or doing the transliteration; getting it printed etc would be an activity associated with MERCURY and to some extent that of Jupiter.

>

> How does Saturn get associated with it?

>

> Regards,

>

> Varun Trivedi

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> , " vishalastrologer " <vishalastrologer@> wrote:

> >

> > Respected Members,

> >

> > Jaisa ki aap sab jante hai ki lal kitab mein jikar aata hai ki SHANI KHANA NUMBER 2 KEY SAMAY MAKAAN(SHANI) JAISA BANE BAN NE DEY.MUBARAK HOGA.yani ki beech mein construction nahi rokni.

> > iska prabhaw hamay LAL KITAB 1952 KA LIPAYANTAR mein dekhne ko mila.14 december 2009 ko part 1 aa gya tha aur announce kiya gya tha ki jan 2010 tak doosra part aa jaye ga.magar 26 march tak bi doosra part mukammal nahi ho saka.

> > Karan sapasht hai pehla part shani 2 tak likha gya.shani ko adhoora chhoda.yahan par b shani apna asar dikha gya.ab dekhte hai shani kab nek hoga.

> > pujya pundit ji ney lal kitab 1952 ko ek hi part mein

> > likha,magar yahan aaj is kitab ko 2 part mein chhapne ka maqsad kya hai yeh to pramatma hi jane.kehte hai jaisi niyat waisi murad.niyat nek to phal nek.

> > yadi yeh lipayantar hai to is kitab ko bilkul waise hi ek part mein kyo nahi likha gya.

> > sabse badi baat gaur karne layak yeh hai ki yadi yeh publisher par apna asar dikha sakti hai to jiske pass hogi ya jo isey do adhoore ko samjhne ya parne ki koshish karega kya use nek asar mil sakta hai.ab yadi koi apni samajh sey 2 part kar dey to kya asar hoga parne walon par aur kitab ki trading karne walon par.

> >

> > With Regards

> >

> > Kunwar Vishal

> >

>

Kulbir ji ,

 

 

yadi gaibi takat hi dekhni hai to aap key liye itna hi

samajhna kafi hoga ki kitab key 2nd part abi tak nahi aa saka.lakh koshish key

bawjood.ab yeh kaun si gaibi takat hai aap acchi tarah samjhte hai.RAWAN 9

GRAHON KO APNE WASH MEY NAHI KAR SAKA TABI TO WO B MAAR KHA GYA.

BAKI YADI KOI LAKIR KA FAKIR BANA REHNA CHAHE TO KOI KYA KARE.BAAR

BAAR PARNE KA KYA MATLAB.

YADI MATLAB SAMJHNA HO TO MIL LENA POORA SAMJHA

DOONGA.GAIBI AUR INSAANI.ITS FINISH.

 

Aadar Sahit

 

Kunwar Vishal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, Kulbir Bains <lalkitabkb wrote:

>

> Kunwar Sahib,

> //jab tak 9 hi grahon ko apni favour mein nahi honge to is kitab ko samajhne

> mein kahi na kahi maar kha hi jaye gey.//

> Bhai ji 9 ke 9 grah to Ravan bhi apne favour mein na kar saka. Matlab na 9

> mann tel hoga na rAAdha ji naachengi.?

>

> //pundit gi ney jis gaibi takat key dwara(rahu favour ki nashani achanak

> madad) yeh kitab samjhi aur....//

> Bhai ji yeh aapko kis Gaibi taaqat ne bata diya?

>

> //tarak shakti(mangal nek)// Accha ji tarak shakti = mangal nek chalo nayi

> bat pata chali MMeharbAAni.

>

> //.iske kale akshar(shani)jinhe ki adhhora(rahu paida karna)chhodna

> ketu(chhalawa) ko barawa dena hai.//

> Bhai ji pehli aur is statement mein koi contradiction ni dikhati aapko.

>

> yAAr inne bande ho style tan badal ke likh daya karo.

>

> AAdAArsAAhit.

> Kulbir Bains.

>

>

> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:03 PM, vishalastrologer <

> vishalastrologer wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > Respected Varun ji & kulbir ji,

> >

> > varun ji aap ki baat sey 100% sehmat hu.magar meri baat par bhi gaur

> > farmayen.lal kitab key anusar jo vyakhya de raha hu use jara gaur sey

> > samjhey.

> >

> > lal kitab kisi ek ya do grahon sey sambandh nahi rakhti.balki 9 hi grah lal

> > kitab key chhapne wale,trading karne wale aur lal kitab jyotish karne walon

> > se poori tarah sambandh rakhte hai.jab tak 9 hi grahon ko apni favour mein

> > nahi honge to is kitab ko samajhne mein kahi na kahi maar kha hi jaye

> > gey.yeh baat alag hi ki kiski favour mein kitne grah hai.yeh ek gaibi kitab

> > hai aur ise kharid kar har koi nahi samjh sakta.khareed to sakta hai.jab tak

> > dimag key khane(budh) hi nahi khule gey to ise kis tarah se samajh sakte

> > hai.pundit gi ney jis gaibi takat key dwara(rahu favour ki nashani achanak

> > madad) yeh kitab samjhi aur logon ko gyan banta bina kisi lalach key(bina

> > mangal badh) is sey unko yash(surya)kitna mila yeh jag jahir hai.yeh unki

> > tarak shakti(mangal nek) thi jo ki is

> > gaibi gyan(chander se vidya aur guru gyan ka karak)kitab(budh) ke roop mein

> > chhapwaya(budh).kitne bimaron ko heal(shukra jise snajivini ka gyan

> > hai)kiya.iske kale akshar(shani)jinhe ki adhhora(rahu paida karna)chhodna

> > ketu(chhalawa) ko barawa dena hai.

> >

> > ab varun ji aur kulbir ji aap hi batayen kya kewal budh ya guru sey lal

> > kitab ka sambandh keh sakte hai.

> >

> > is liye lal kitab chhapna aur samjhna aur iske dwara yash milna aur daulat

> > milna ya pareshani milna yeh us insaan key grah vishesh sey sambandh rakhta

> > hai.dhanyawad

> >

> > Aadar sahit

> >

> > Kunwar Vishal

> >

> >

> > --- In

<%40>,

> > " varun_trvd " <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected Vishal ji,

> > >

> > > Writing a book or doing the transliteration; getting it printed etc would

> > be an activity associated with MERCURY and to some extent that of Jupiter.

> > >

> > > How does Saturn get associated with it?

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > Varun Trivedi

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > --- In

<%40>,

> > " vishalastrologer " <vishalastrologer@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Respected Members,

> > > >

> > > > Jaisa ki aap sab jante hai ki lal kitab mein jikar aata hai ki SHANI

> > KHANA NUMBER 2 KEY SAMAY MAKAAN(SHANI) JAISA BANE BAN NE DEY.MUBARAK

> > HOGA.yani ki beech mein construction nahi rokni.

> > > > iska prabhaw hamay LAL KITAB 1952 KA LIPAYANTAR mein dekhne ko mila.14

> > december 2009 ko part 1 aa gya tha aur announce kiya gya tha ki jan 2010 tak

> > doosra part aa jaye ga.magar 26 march tak bi doosra part mukammal nahi ho

> > saka.

> > > > Karan sapasht hai pehla part shani 2 tak likha gya.shani ko adhoora

> > chhoda.yahan par b shani apna asar dikha gya.ab dekhte hai shani kab nek

> > hoga.

> > > > pujya pundit ji ney lal kitab 1952 ko ek hi part mein

> > > > likha,magar yahan aaj is kitab ko 2 part mein chhapne ka maqsad kya hai

> > yeh to pramatma hi jane.kehte hai jaisi niyat waisi murad.niyat nek to phal

> > nek.

> > > > yadi yeh lipayantar hai to is kitab ko bilkul waise hi ek part mein kyo

> > nahi likha gya.

> > > > sabse badi baat gaur karne layak yeh hai ki yadi yeh publisher par apna

> > asar dikha sakti hai to jiske pass hogi ya jo isey do adhoore ko samjhne ya

> > parne ki koshish karega kya use nek asar mil sakta hai.ab yadi koi apni

> > samajh sey 2 part kar dey to kya asar hoga parne walon par aur kitab ki

> > trading karne walon par.

> > > >

> > > > With Regards

> > > >

> > > > Kunwar Vishal

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

>

Respected Vishal ji,I agree to your point of thinking. You think out of the box. Thinking out of the box is considered a very good thing in any profession.But please let me say one thing that thinking out of the box should only be started when, in the box things are totally clear in mind.I mean you are applying some heuristics, without any proof. Obviously there is no theoritical ( just relating the words here and there is not a proof. We all must have read the RUK MAT JANA phrase with and without proper punctuation) proof to such things but if you are talking like this then there should be some practical proofs. If some then please quote.Going with your point we can say that any civil engineer with a malefic saturn can not get any project to completion. Or going

more specific such a person can never write a book on civil engineering. But I would rather say that there are a lot and renowned person who wrote on building construction and are with a malefic saturn.As I feel writing a book in one or two parts is something related to budh or guru. There is never a connection with the planet being talked in the book.If such was the case then every poet should have been ruined by now. A poet almost describe the karak objects of all the 9 planets in his poem.Nevertheless let's talk about pandit ji itself. He had talked about every planet in his book. How do you take the point that he has given a priority to some planet and a very less attention to some other planet. Were pundit ji affected by some planet just because he did not give much attention to some planet or just because he gave a lot of explanation about a specific

planet.I believe on the fact that we should consider the scenario(aas paas ka mahol jahan pe jatak reh raha hai, ya jis mahol mein kaam kar raha hai) at first priority. I mean if we see a bad venus then there might be some arguments in husband and wife. But we can not say a statement that a husband who don't like his wife's home(or sasur, sala and their house) is with a bad venus.BTW in one of your last mail you told me that I can be an astrologer because my mercury is strong enough. Could you please defend your point? My birth details are 9th july 1981, 7:15 PM, charkhi dadri (haryana).Please forgive me if I have talked a lot. In astrology field, I am just at the point where you can say "for dummies only".regards,--Pradeep.--- On Sat, 3/27/10, vishalastrologer

<vishalastrologer wrote:vishalastrologer <vishalastrologerLK discussion group Re: Shani ko Adhoora Chhoda Date: Saturday, March 27, 2010, 1:03 PM

 

 

Respected Varun ji & kulbir ji,

 

varun ji aap ki baat sey 100% sehmat hu.magar meri baat par bhi gaur farmayen.lal kitab key anusar jo vyakhya de raha hu use jara gaur sey samjhey.

 

lal kitab kisi ek ya do grahon sey sambandh nahi rakhti.balki 9 hi grah lal kitab key chhapne wale,trading karne wale aur lal kitab jyotish karne walon se poori tarah sambandh rakhte hai.jab tak 9 hi grahon ko apni favour mein nahi honge to is kitab ko samajhne mein kahi na kahi maar kha hi jaye gey.yeh baat alag hi ki kiski favour mein kitne grah hai.yeh ek gaibi kitab hai aur ise kharid kar har koi nahi samjh sakta.khareed to sakta hai.jab tak dimag key khane(budh) hi nahi khule gey to ise kis tarah se samajh sakte hai.pundit gi ney jis gaibi takat key dwara(rahu favour ki nashani achanak madad) yeh kitab samjhi aur logon ko gyan banta bina kisi lalach key(bina mangal badh) is sey unko yash(surya)kitna mila yeh jag jahir hai.yeh unki tarak shakti(mangal nek) thi jo ki is

gaibi gyan(chander se vidya aur guru gyan ka karak)kitab( budh) ke roop mein chhapwaya(budh) .kitne bimaron ko heal(shukra jise snajivini ka gyan hai)kiya.iske kale akshar(shani) jinhe ki adhhora(rahu paida karna)chhodna ketu(chhalawa) ko barawa dena hai.

 

ab varun ji aur kulbir ji aap hi batayen kya kewal budh ya guru sey lal kitab ka sambandh keh sakte hai.

 

is liye lal kitab chhapna aur samjhna aur iske dwara yash milna aur daulat milna ya pareshani milna yeh us insaan key grah vishesh sey sambandh rakhta hai.dhanyawad

 

Aadar sahit

 

Kunwar Vishal

 

, "varun_trvd" <varun_trvd@ ...> wrote:

>

> Respected Vishal ji,

>

> Writing a book or doing the transliteration; getting it printed etc would be an activity associated with MERCURY and to some extent that of Jupiter.

>

> How does Saturn get associated with it?

>

> Regards,

>

> Varun Trivedi

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> , "vishalastrologer" <vishalastrologer@ > wrote:

> >

> > Respected Members,

> >

> > Jaisa ki aap sab jante hai ki lal kitab mein jikar aata hai ki SHANI KHANA NUMBER 2 KEY SAMAY MAKAAN(SHANI) JAISA BANE BAN NE DEY.MUBARAK HOGA.yani ki beech mein construction nahi rokni.

> > iska prabhaw hamay LAL KITAB 1952 KA LIPAYANTAR mein dekhne ko mila.14 december 2009 ko part 1 aa gya tha aur announce kiya gya tha ki jan 2010 tak doosra part aa jaye ga.magar 26 march tak bi doosra part mukammal nahi ho saka.

> > Karan sapasht hai pehla part shani 2 tak likha gya.shani ko adhoora chhoda.yahan par b shani apna asar dikha gya.ab dekhte hai shani kab nek hoga.

> > pujya pundit ji ney lal kitab 1952 ko ek hi part mein

> > likha,magar yahan aaj is kitab ko 2 part mein chhapne ka maqsad kya hai yeh to pramatma hi jane.kehte hai jaisi niyat waisi murad.niyat nek to phal nek.

> > yadi yeh lipayantar hai to is kitab ko bilkul waise hi ek part mein kyo nahi likha gya.

> > sabse badi baat gaur karne layak yeh hai ki yadi yeh publisher par apna asar dikha sakti hai to jiske pass hogi ya jo isey do adhoore ko samjhne ya parne ki koshish karega kya use nek asar mil sakta hai.ab yadi koi apni samajh sey 2 part kar dey to kya asar hoga parne walon par aur kitab ki trading karne walon par.

> >

> > With Regards

> >

> > Kunwar Vishal

> >

>

Respected Vishal ji,

 

Why can't you accept that Pt Goswami ji will bring out the second part at his

own convenience?

 

Why should he hurry up things simply because you want him to hurry up?

 

Pt. Goswami is not sebservient to any one of us.

 

He is a free individual, and is free to take his time.

 

He is in no way bound to any one of us. He doesn't owe us any thing.

 

We are grateful to him that he took up this stupendous task of transliterating

the 4 editions of the Lal Kitab.

 

Instead of being grateful to Pt. Goswami, you have been trying to belittle his

effort by bringing in irrelevent issues. This is in bad taste.

 

I smell more than what appears in your messages.

 

Therefore, I will not entertain any more messages from you on this topic.

 

Regards,

 

Varun Trivedi

 

 

 

, " vishalastrologer "

<vishalastrologer wrote:

>

> Kulbir ji ,

>

>

> yadi gaibi takat hi dekhni hai to aap key liye itna hi

> samajhna kafi hoga ki kitab key 2nd part abi tak nahi aa saka.lakh koshish key

bawjood.ab yeh kaun si gaibi takat hai aap acchi tarah samjhte hai.RAWAN 9

GRAHON KO APNE WASH MEY NAHI KAR SAKA TABI TO WO B MAAR KHA GYA.

> BAKI YADI KOI LAKIR KA FAKIR BANA REHNA CHAHE TO KOI KYA

KARE.BAAR BAAR PARNE KA KYA MATLAB.

> YADI MATLAB SAMJHNA HO TO MIL LENA POORA SAMJHA

DOONGA.GAIBI AUR INSAANI.ITS FINISH.

>

> Aadar Sahit

>

> Kunwar Vishal

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

, Kulbir Bains <lalkitabkb@> wrote:

> >

> > Kunwar Sahib,

> > //jab tak 9 hi grahon ko apni favour mein nahi honge to is kitab ko samajhne

> > mein kahi na kahi maar kha hi jaye gey.//

> > Bhai ji 9 ke 9 grah to Ravan bhi apne favour mein na kar saka. Matlab na 9

> > mann tel hoga na rAAdha ji naachengi.?

> >

> > //pundit gi ney jis gaibi takat key dwara(rahu favour ki nashani achanak

> > madad) yeh kitab samjhi aur....//

> > Bhai ji yeh aapko kis Gaibi taaqat ne bata diya?

> >

> > //tarak shakti(mangal nek)// Accha ji tarak shakti = mangal nek chalo nayi

> > bat pata chali MMeharbAAni.

> >

> > //.iske kale akshar(shani)jinhe ki adhhora(rahu paida karna)chhodna

> > ketu(chhalawa) ko barawa dena hai.//

> > Bhai ji pehli aur is statement mein koi contradiction ni dikhati aapko.

> >

> > yAAr inne bande ho style tan badal ke likh daya karo.

> >

> > AAdAArsAAhit.

> > Kulbir Bains.

> >

> >

> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:03 PM, vishalastrologer <

> > vishalastrologer@> wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > Respected Varun ji & kulbir ji,

> > >

> > > varun ji aap ki baat sey 100% sehmat hu.magar meri baat par bhi gaur

> > > farmayen.lal kitab key anusar jo vyakhya de raha hu use jara gaur sey

> > > samjhey.

> > >

> > > lal kitab kisi ek ya do grahon sey sambandh nahi rakhti.balki 9 hi grah

lal

> > > kitab key chhapne wale,trading karne wale aur lal kitab jyotish karne

walon

> > > se poori tarah sambandh rakhte hai.jab tak 9 hi grahon ko apni favour mein

> > > nahi honge to is kitab ko samajhne mein kahi na kahi maar kha hi jaye

> > > gey.yeh baat alag hi ki kiski favour mein kitne grah hai.yeh ek gaibi

kitab

> > > hai aur ise kharid kar har koi nahi samjh sakta.khareed to sakta hai.jab

tak

> > > dimag key khane(budh) hi nahi khule gey to ise kis tarah se samajh sakte

> > > hai.pundit gi ney jis gaibi takat key dwara(rahu favour ki nashani achanak

> > > madad) yeh kitab samjhi aur logon ko gyan banta bina kisi lalach key(bina

> > > mangal badh) is sey unko yash(surya)kitna mila yeh jag jahir hai.yeh unki

> > > tarak shakti(mangal nek) thi jo ki is

> > > gaibi gyan(chander se vidya aur guru gyan ka karak)kitab(budh) ke roop

mein

> > > chhapwaya(budh).kitne bimaron ko heal(shukra jise snajivini ka gyan

> > > hai)kiya.iske kale akshar(shani)jinhe ki adhhora(rahu paida karna)chhodna

> > > ketu(chhalawa) ko barawa dena hai.

> > >

> > > ab varun ji aur kulbir ji aap hi batayen kya kewal budh ya guru sey lal

> > > kitab ka sambandh keh sakte hai.

> > >

> > > is liye lal kitab chhapna aur samjhna aur iske dwara yash milna aur daulat

> > > milna ya pareshani milna yeh us insaan key grah vishesh sey sambandh

rakhta

> > > hai.dhanyawad

> > >

> > > Aadar sahit

> > >

> > > Kunwar Vishal

> > >

> > >

> > > --- In

<%40>,

> > > " varun_trvd " <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Respected Vishal ji,

> > > >

> > > > Writing a book or doing the transliteration; getting it printed etc

would

> > > be an activity associated with MERCURY and to some extent that of Jupiter.

> > > >

> > > > How does Saturn get associated with it?

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Varun Trivedi

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > --- In

<%40>,

> > > " vishalastrologer " <vishalastrologer@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Respected Members,

> > > > >

> > > > > Jaisa ki aap sab jante hai ki lal kitab mein jikar aata hai ki SHANI

> > > KHANA NUMBER 2 KEY SAMAY MAKAAN(SHANI) JAISA BANE BAN NE DEY.MUBARAK

> > > HOGA.yani ki beech mein construction nahi rokni.

> > > > > iska prabhaw hamay LAL KITAB 1952 KA LIPAYANTAR mein dekhne ko mila.14

> > > december 2009 ko part 1 aa gya tha aur announce kiya gya tha ki jan 2010

tak

> > > doosra part aa jaye ga.magar 26 march tak bi doosra part mukammal nahi ho

> > > saka.

> > > > > Karan sapasht hai pehla part shani 2 tak likha gya.shani ko adhoora

> > > chhoda.yahan par b shani apna asar dikha gya.ab dekhte hai shani kab nek

> > > hoga.

> > > > > pujya pundit ji ney lal kitab 1952 ko ek hi part mein

> > > > > likha,magar yahan aaj is kitab ko 2 part mein chhapne ka maqsad kya

hai

> > > yeh to pramatma hi jane.kehte hai jaisi niyat waisi murad.niyat nek to

phal

> > > nek.

> > > > > yadi yeh lipayantar hai to is kitab ko bilkul waise hi ek part mein

kyo

> > > nahi likha gya.

> > > > > sabse badi baat gaur karne layak yeh hai ki yadi yeh publisher par

apna

> > > asar dikha sakti hai to jiske pass hogi ya jo isey do adhoore ko samjhne

ya

> > > parne ki koshish karega kya use nek asar mil sakta hai.ab yadi koi apni

> > > samajh sey 2 part kar dey to kya asar hoga parne walon par aur kitab ki

> > > trading karne walon par.

> > > > >

> > > > > With Regards

> > > > >

> > > > > Kunwar Vishal

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>