Venus in the 12th house

shashank ji plese read the latest message by tyagi ji. apart from that

i can only vaguely guess that the person who suggested this upaya did

it for the reason that there may be some natal or varshphal

consideration where rahu must be troubling venus. as for ur question

jau is realted to venus only when rahu is associated with venus.

nothing to do with venus alone.

kulbir bains -

-- In , " shashank.dikshit "

<shashank.dikshit wrote:

>

> Sir,

>

> I have venus in the 12th house and have marital problems. I have

been

> advised to bury jau in veeran jagah. Sir how is jau related to venus?

>

> respectfully,

>

> Shashank

>

Dear Shashank ji & Kulbir Bhai,

Assuming that Venus is acting malefic after studying the entire

Kundali, the astrologer who had advised burying Jau in a barren

place is correct and also logical.

It would have been better if the astrologer had advised Shashank ji

to ask his wife to buy the jau and gift it to shashank ji for burial.

The logic of the upaya is simple. Venus is made up of rahu+ketu. In

the 12th house if Venus is adjudged as malefic , then it has to be

the Rahu constituent of it who would give malefic results in the

12th house because the Ketu would be a benefic planet there.

Wife { venus } gifting the jau means that venus is parting away with

the rahu constituent. Jau buried in a barren place would mean that

the effects of it are destroyed for that year. For some astrologers

it could also mean that Rahu has been deposited in the 6th house,

where it would not act malefic.

Whatever be the case, the constituent of venus which was creating

the problem has been taken care of.

The Ketu constituent of venus would be a benefic in the 12th and

hence the Venus would start getting benefic once it has shed off the

malefic part..

With regards,

Varun Trivedi

, " kulbirbains "

<kulbirbains wrote:

>

> shashank ji plese read the latest message by tyagi ji. apart from

that

> i can only vaguely guess that the person who suggested this upaya

did

> it for the reason that there may be some natal or varshphal

> consideration where rahu must be troubling venus. as for ur

question

> jau is realted to venus only when rahu is associated with venus.

> nothing to do with venus alone.

> kulbir

bains -

> -- In , " shashank.dikshit "

> <shashank.dikshit@> wrote:

> >

> > Sir,

> >

> > I have venus in the 12th house and have marital problems. I have

> been

> > advised to bury jau in veeran jagah. Sir how is jau related to

venus?

> >

> > respectfully,

> >

> > Shashank

> >

>

Dear Trivediji, I have been following the discussions with great interest. I am a beginner. My query is related to the burrying of a karak and thus depriving the native of both the benefic and the malefic effect of the planet. In the post below you write that by burrying, the effect of a planet is destroyed for a year. Now, the upayas are based on the janam kundli and varsh phal kundali. If a karak is to be buried according to the janam kundali, does that mean the effect would last a life time?? Because, the varsh phal kundali is for a particular year, and based on the planetary configuration for that particular year, upayas would be recommended. This may or may not require burial of the same or of some other karakWith warm regards Bobby Mehrotravarun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: Dear Shashank ji & Kulbir Bhai,Assuming that Venus is acting malefic after studying the entire Kundali, the astrologer who had advised burying Jau in a barren place is correct and also logical.It would have been better if the astrologer had advised Shashank ji to ask his wife to buy the jau and gift it to shashank ji for burial.The logic of the upaya is simple. Venus is made up of rahu+ketu. In the 12th house if Venus is adjudged as malefic , then it has to be the Rahu constituent of it who would give malefic results in the 12th house because the Ketu would be a benefic planet there.

Wife { venus } gifting the jau means that venus is parting away with the rahu constituent. Jau buried in a barren place would mean that the effects of it are destroyed for that year. For some astrologers it could also mean that Rahu has been deposited in the 6th house, where it would not act malefic. Whatever be the case, the constituent of venus which was creating the problem has been taken care of.The Ketu constituent of venus would be a benefic in the 12th and hence the Venus would start getting benefic once it has shed off the malefic part..With regards,Varun Trivedi , "kulbirbains" <kulbirbains wrote:>> shashank ji plese read the latest message by tyagi ji. apart from that > i can only vaguely guess that the person who suggested this upaya

did > it for the reason that there may be some natal or varshphal > consideration where rahu must be troubling venus. as for ur question > jau is realted to venus only when rahu is associated with venus. > nothing to do with venus alone.> kulbir bains -> -- In , "shashank.dikshit" > <shashank.dikshit@> wrote:> >> > Sir,> > > > I have venus in the 12th house and have marital problems. I have > been > > advised to bury jau in veeran jagah. Sir how is jau related to venus?> > > > respectfully,> > > > Shashank> >>

Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger