Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

To Pradeep - Akula

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Pradeep,

 

In Sir John Woodroff's 'The Serpent Power', meaning of Akula

is given as Siva.

 

Also there is a reference as below:

 

"THE SAHASRARA IS CALLED AKULA ACCORDING TO SWACHANDRASAMGRAHA, CITED

BY VISWANATHA......" --PAGE NO: 419.

 

In lalita sahsranama, the definition is as follows:

 

Akula: Who is also the Akula (Siva) who is in the thousand-petalled

lotus above the Kula Path.

 

If you come across any more references, kindly mention me the book.

 

Regards,

jyothi

 

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep"

<vijayadas_pradeep> wrote:

>

> Dear Shri Vishnu

>

> Pramana - ''Kulabhidham '' - Means having name as Kula.Thus Kula is

at

> bottom.

> Now please read the Shloka that i have provided.

>

> http://vedabase.net/a/abhidha

>

> Thus you have the Pramana that you need.

>

> Now except for you ,all the translators have understood Mooladhara

as

> in perineum.This is the place which is between Guda and Linga.Coccyx

> is the posterior.This much anatomy is clear for everyone.

>

> You are having Libra in mind and is not ready to change.

>

> Thanks

> Pradeep

> vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala

> <jvishnu@g...> wrote:

> >

> > || Hare Rama Krishna ||

> >

> > Dear Sri.Pradeep,

> >

> > Namaste,

> >

> >

> > >

> > > Same as the above said Kula/Akuala !!!.You have some special

> Pramanas.Thiscan explain your debating style.

> >

> >

> >

> > When confronted with a pramana, you offer no argument whatsoever

other

> > than flashy statements/words like "TOTALLY WRONG UNDERSTANDING OF

SRI

> > CHAKRA", "BLUNDERS". When pointedly asked to explain, all one

could see

> > was "SILENCE".

> >

> > I am sorry I couldn't match your style of "IGNORE", "SILENCE",

> "REFUGE IN

> > PHILOSOPHY" and "JUMPING AROUND" from sacrum to coccyx to

perineum!

> >

> > You were the one asking "pramana, pramana, pramana" and that is

> EXACTLY what

> > you got! I had asked you to quote your pramana for "Akula at top"

> and there

> > was nothing but a whole page of long winding philosophy.

> >

> > You can't provide a pramana.

> >

> > You have no idea where spinal axis ends, yet you have the temerity

> to write

> > "go ask any anatomy lecturer".

> >

> > You have no idea whatsoever how other chakras are palced.

> >

> > blame my debating style? brand them as special pramana?

> >

> > Ignoring pramana and indulging in "MOOLADHAARA IN MOOLA" slogan,

proves

> > nothing!

> >

> > Any ways ,thanks for your valuable time.I do not think we are

going

> to reach

> > any conclusion with the ongoing style.

> >

> > You are absolutely right, we cannot reach a conclusion when you

abdicate

> > your avowed position "pramana based debate" and seek refuge in

> philosphy.

> > Don't enter a debate if you cannot withstand pramanas you have

never

> laid

> > eyes on!

> >

> >

> >

> > warm regards,

> > Vishnu

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > --

> > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram

> > vyaptam yena charaa charam

> > tatpadam darsita yena

> > tasmai sri gurave namah

> >

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Jyothi

 

Thanks for the references.

 

Pradeep

 

vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi"

<jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

>

> Dear Pradeep,

>

> In Sir John Woodroff's 'The Serpent Power', meaning of Akula

> is given as Siva.

>

> Also there is a reference as below:

>

> "THE SAHASRARA IS CALLED AKULA ACCORDING TO SWACHANDRASAMGRAHA, CITED

> BY VISWANATHA......" --PAGE NO: 419.

>

> In lalita sahsranama, the definition is as follows:

>

> Akula: Who is also the Akula (Siva) who is in the thousand-petalled

> lotus above the Kula Path.

>

> If you come across any more references, kindly mention me the book.

>

> Regards,

> jyothi

>

>

>

>

>

> vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep"

> <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Shri Vishnu

> >

> > Pramana - ''Kulabhidham '' - Means having name as Kula.Thus Kula is

> at

> > bottom.

> > Now please read the Shloka that i have provided.

> >

> > http://vedabase.net/a/abhidha

> >

> > Thus you have the Pramana that you need.

> >

> > Now except for you ,all the translators have understood Mooladhara

> as

> > in perineum.This is the place which is between Guda and Linga.Coccyx

> > is the posterior.This much anatomy is clear for everyone.

> >

> > You are having Libra in mind and is not ready to change.

> >

> > Thanks

> > Pradeep

> > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala

> > <jvishnu@g...> wrote:

> > >

> > > || Hare Rama Krishna ||

> > >

> > > Dear Sri.Pradeep,

> > >

> > > Namaste,

> > >

> > >

> > > >

> > > > Same as the above said Kula/Akuala !!!.You have some special

> > Pramanas.Thiscan explain your debating style.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > When confronted with a pramana, you offer no argument whatsoever

> other

> > > than flashy statements/words like "TOTALLY WRONG UNDERSTANDING OF

> SRI

> > > CHAKRA", "BLUNDERS". When pointedly asked to explain, all one

> could see

> > > was "SILENCE".

> > >

> > > I am sorry I couldn't match your style of "IGNORE", "SILENCE",

> > "REFUGE IN

> > > PHILOSOPHY" and "JUMPING AROUND" from sacrum to coccyx to

> perineum!

> > >

> > > You were the one asking "pramana, pramana, pramana" and that is

> > EXACTLY what

> > > you got! I had asked you to quote your pramana for "Akula at top"

> > and there

> > > was nothing but a whole page of long winding philosophy.

> > >

> > > You can't provide a pramana.

> > >

> > > You have no idea where spinal axis ends, yet you have the temerity

> > to write

> > > "go ask any anatomy lecturer".

> > >

> > > You have no idea whatsoever how other chakras are palced.

> > >

> > > blame my debating style? brand them as special pramana?

> > >

> > > Ignoring pramana and indulging in "MOOLADHAARA IN MOOLA" slogan,

> proves

> > > nothing!

> > >

> > > Any ways ,thanks for your valuable time.I do not think we are

> going

> > to reach

> > > any conclusion with the ongoing style.

> > >

> > > You are absolutely right, we cannot reach a conclusion when you

> abdicate

> > > your avowed position "pramana based debate" and seek refuge in

> > philosphy.

> > > Don't enter a debate if you cannot withstand pramanas you have

> never

> > laid

> > > eyes on!

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > warm regards,

> > > Vishnu

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > --

> > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram

> > > vyaptam yena charaa charam

> > > tatpadam darsita yena

> > > tasmai sri gurave namah

> > >

> >

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...