Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

Shuklambaradaram Vishnum

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I read somewhere that the complete

"Shuklambaradaram Vishnum

>shashivarnam...... is

 

Shuklaambaradaram Vishnum

shashivarnam chathurbujam

prasanna vadanam dhiyayethe

sarva vignopha saanthaye

 

Gajanaana padmasana

gajanaana mahirsham

ane`ka dantam bakthanaama

eka dantam upasmayema.

 

- Karpagam.

 

 

>sukumar <sukumar

>"Srirangasri" <Srirangasri>,

>Oppiliappan <Oppiliappan>, "ramanuja"

><ramanuja>

> RE: the meaning of pranavam

>Tue, 20 May 2003 19:03:10 +0530

>

>

>Sri Krishnaya Namah!

>

>I have been looking for meaning of the sloka -- "Shuklambaradaram Vishnum

>shashivarnam............." As I can deduce nowhere in this sloka there is

>mention of Vinayaka, while there is a mention of Lord Vishnu. One of my

>acquintances (who is a purohit) also told me that this sloka is actually

>addressed to Lord Vishnu.

>

>If this is for Vinayaka, then do we have any such sloka for Lord

>Vishwaksena, which is chanted before starting any auspicious deeds.

>

>

>Sukumar

>

>Sri Krishnaparabrahmane Namah!

>

>balajiv_54 [sMTP:balajiv_54]

>29/04/2003 6:45 PM

>bhakti-list

>Re: the meaning of pranavam

>

>dear sir,

>iam grateful for your apt replt to the meaning of pranavam(aum or ohm)

>i am thinking in this way.

>ohm is the begining of all,including brahma,vishnu and shivan.it is

>this shakti which makes all gods do their functions like brahma does

>the job of producing,vishnu does the job of protecting and shiva does

>the job of destroying. all the three take their orders by yogic

>power. as lord krishna says in geetha after he shows the virata

>roopam. he says he could show this because of the yogic power he has

>and all that is possible because he is an avatar of vishnu.

>

>in sandyavandanam we invoke this ohm after doing achamanam and

>ganpathi dhiyanam.shuklam paradharam vishnum sasivarnam

>chathurbhujam,prasanna vadanam dhiyayeth sarva vikhnoba shanthayedh.

>in doing pranayamam we invoke the ohmkaram

>

>i do not know if iam correct.the learned may guide me.

>

>balaji

>

>bhakti-list, "Ram Anbil" <Ramanbil@h...> wrote:

> > Dear friend:

> >

> > As per our Siddhantam, PraNavam comprises of three

>syllables "a", "u" and

> > 'ma". "a" denotes Sriman Narayana. "u" represents "Thaayaar". In

>another

> > yojana, it is said to denote "only", since "a" itself is taken to

>denote the

> > divine couplle (Sriman Narayana and His inseparable Consort, Sri

> > Mahaalakshmi") "ma" represents the Jivatma. Taken together, it

>means that

> > the Jeevatma exists as the servitor ONLY for the divine couple as

>aforesaid.

> >

> > Swami Desikan in his "Srimad Rahasya Traya Saaram" has established

>this

> > truth beyond any doubt quoting appropriate PramaaNams from the

>Vedas down to

> > the least of our scriptures.

>**************************

>[ Rest clipped --Moderator]

>

>

>

>-----------------------------

> - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -

>To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list

>Group Home: bhakti-list

>Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/

>

>

>Your use of is subject to

>

>

>

 

_______________

The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Namaskarams.

 

We have a very beautiful slokam (second one) in vishnu sahasranamam which

invokes the grace of Vishwaksenar (otherwise also called as Senai Mudaliar).

 

yasya sthiravikrAtyA parisaktyA parasthatam

visvam nignathi satatham vishwaksenam tama asrayE.

 

The slokam suklambaratharam ........ upa santhayE invokes the blessings of

Lord Vishnu meaning :

 

suklam - white

ambaram - cloth

tharam - dressed in (white cloth)

vishnum - vishnu (all prevading)

shashivarnam - darkish blue colour

chaturbujam - who has four hands

prasanna vathanam - who has happy blissful face (muka mandalam)

dyayEth - grace me

sarava - all

vigna - difficulties

upa santhayE - over come

 

The Lord Vishnu who is dressed in white cloth and who resides everywhere

(vishnu) and who is darkish blue in colour and who has four hands and who

has a blissful face, please grace me to overcome all difficulties (the karma

I am going to do).

 

Best regards

 

G.Sundarrajan

Aneka Kimia Raya Group

7-8th Floor, Jalan Panjang No.5

Kebon Jeruk, Jakarta, Indonesia

Tel : 62-21-5311588

Fax : 62-21-5311388

Mobile : 62-811193742

 

-

"M Karpagam" <m_karpagam

<sukumar; <Srirangasri>;

<Oppiliappan>; <ramanuja>

Wednesday, May 21, 2003 1:59 AM

[ramanuja] Shuklambaradaram Vishnum

 

 

> I read somewhere that the complete

> "Shuklambaradaram Vishnum

> >shashivarnam...... is

>

> Shuklaambaradaram Vishnum

> shashivarnam chathurbujam

> prasanna vadanam dhiyayethe

> sarva vignopha saanthaye

>

> Gajanaana padmasana

> gajanaana mahirsham

> ane`ka dantam bakthanaama

> eka dantam upasmayema.

>

> - Karpagam.

>

>

> >sukumar <sukumar

> >"Srirangasri" <Srirangasri>,

> >Oppiliappan <Oppiliappan>, "ramanuja"

> ><ramanuja>

> > RE: the meaning of pranavam

> >Tue, 20 May 2003 19:03:10 +0530

> >

> >

> >Sri Krishnaya Namah!

> >

> >I have been looking for meaning of the sloka -- "Shuklambaradaram

Vishnum

> >shashivarnam............." As I can deduce nowhere in this sloka there

is

> >mention of Vinayaka, while there is a mention of Lord Vishnu. One of my

> >acquintances (who is a purohit) also told me that this sloka is actually

> >addressed to Lord Vishnu.

> >

> >If this is for Vinayaka, then do we have any such sloka for Lord

> >Vishwaksena, which is chanted before starting any auspicious deeds.

> >

> >

> >Sukumar

> >

> >Sri Krishnaparabrahmane Namah!

> >

> >balajiv_54 [sMTP:balajiv_54]

> >29/04/2003 6:45 PM

> >bhakti-list

> >Re: the meaning of pranavam

> >

> >dear sir,

> >iam grateful for your apt replt to the meaning of pranavam(aum or ohm)

> >i am thinking in this way.

> >ohm is the begining of all,including brahma,vishnu and shivan.it is

> >this shakti which makes all gods do their functions like brahma does

> >the job of producing,vishnu does the job of protecting and shiva does

> >the job of destroying. all the three take their orders by yogic

> >power. as lord krishna says in geetha after he shows the virata

> >roopam. he says he could show this because of the yogic power he has

> >and all that is possible because he is an avatar of vishnu.

> >

> >in sandyavandanam we invoke this ohm after doing achamanam and

> >ganpathi dhiyanam.shuklam paradharam vishnum sasivarnam

> >chathurbhujam,prasanna vadanam dhiyayeth sarva vikhnoba shanthayedh.

> >in doing pranayamam we invoke the ohmkaram

> >

> >i do not know if iam correct.the learned may guide me.

> >

> >balaji

> >

> >bhakti-list, "Ram Anbil" <Ramanbil@h...> wrote:

> > > Dear friend:

> > >

> > > As per our Siddhantam, PraNavam comprises of three

> >syllables "a", "u" and

> > > 'ma". "a" denotes Sriman Narayana. "u" represents "Thaayaar". In

> >another

> > > yojana, it is said to denote "only", since "a" itself is taken to

> >denote the

> > > divine couplle (Sriman Narayana and His inseparable Consort, Sri

> > > Mahaalakshmi") "ma" represents the Jivatma. Taken together, it

> >means that

> > > the Jeevatma exists as the servitor ONLY for the divine couple as

> >aforesaid.

> > >

> > > Swami Desikan in his "Srimad Rahasya Traya Saaram" has established

> >this

> > > truth beyond any doubt quoting appropriate PramaaNams from the

> >Vedas down to

> > > the least of our scriptures.

> >**************************

> >[ Rest clipped --Moderator]

> >

> >

> >

> >-----------------------------

> > - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -

> >To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list

> >Group Home: bhakti-list

> >Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/

> >

> >

> >Your use of is subject to

> >

> >

> >

>

> _______________

> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*

> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

>

>

>

>

> azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Jai Ramanuja,

The shloka invoking lord vishvaksena is to be corrected as

below.

yasya dviradavaktradyaaha paarishadyaaha parashshatam,

VIGNAM NIGHNANTI satatam VISHVAKSENAM tam aashreaye.

dasan

 

On Wed, 21 May 2003 Sundar Radjan wrote :

>Namaskarams.

>

>We have a very beautiful slokam (second one) in vishnu

>sahasranamam which

>invokes the grace of Vishwaksenar (otherwise also called as Senai

>Mudaliar).

>

>yasya sthiravikrAtyA parisaktyA parasthatam

>visvam nignathi satatham vishwaksenam tama asrayE.

>

>The slokam suklambaratharam ........ upa santhayE invokes the

>blessings of

>Lord Vishnu meaning :

>

>suklam - white

>ambaram - cloth

>tharam - dressed in (white cloth)

>vishnum - vishnu (all prevading)

>shashivarnam - darkish blue colour

>chaturbujam - who has four hands

>prasanna vathanam - who has happy blissful face (muka mandalam)

>dyayEth - grace me

>sarava - all

>vigna - difficulties

>upa santhayE - over come

>

>The Lord Vishnu who is dressed in white cloth and who resides

>everywhere

>(vishnu) and who is darkish blue in colour and who has four hands

>and who

>has a blissful face, please grace me to overcome all difficulties

>(the karma

>I am going to do).

>

>Best regards

>

>G.Sundarrajan

>Aneka Kimia Raya Group

>7-8th Floor, Jalan Panjang No.5

>Kebon Jeruk, Jakarta, Indonesia

>Tel : 62-21-5311588

>Fax : 62-21-5311388

>Mobile : 62-811193742

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

ramanuja, "M Karpagam" <m_karpagam@h...> wrote:

> I read somewhere that the complete

> "Shuklambaradaram Vishnum

> >shashivarnam...... is

>

> Shuklaambaradaram Vishnum

> shashivarnam chathurbujam

> prasanna vadanam dhiyayethe

> sarva vignopha saanthaye

 

Dear Sri Karpagam,

 

The above verse ius believd to be on VishNu only and sahasra nAma

pArAyaNam starts with it.

 

The correct transliteration is:

 

SuklAmbaradharam vishNum

SaSivarNam chaturbhujam

prasanna vadanam dhAyEt

sarva vignhOpaSAntayE

 

For us, the only remover of obstacles is SrImannArAyaNa.

 

>

> Gajanaana padmasana

> gajanaana mahirsham

> ane`ka dantam bakthanaama

> eka dantam upasmayema.

 

This is a verse on VinAyaka. the correct version is:

 

agajAnana padmArkam

gajAnanamaharniSam

anEkadam tam bhaktAnAm

EkadantamupAsmahE

 

Here anEkadam means one who gives many things to his devotees.

Ekadantam means one who has only on tooth. But people wronlgly

pronounce it as "anEkadantam" and thus see him first with several

teeth and then with only one! unforutnate thing is those knowing

samskrutam very well also do not try to correct people but they

themsleves chant like that.

 

Regards

Vishnu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Sri:

Srimathe Ramanujaya nama:

Dear Vinjamuri Vishnu,

Some errors in your transliteration:-)

(i)do u use ch for first "ca"? If so,do you use Ch for "cha"? If u

follow this,then it's okay. If not,then it should have been

caturbhujam instead of chaturbhujam[ch/ca and Ch/cha].

(ii)dhyAyEt(meditation) and not dhAyEt

(ii)u have used first 'ga(ga)' in vignhO but it is second 'gha/Ga'

[gh/ga and Gh/gha]

 

But I do agree with you that even people who know samskrtham write it

wrongly that it can convey something totally different. At times

transliteration is very interesting and at other times it is a pain

in the neck!

 

AzhvAr emperumAnAr jIyar thiruvadigaLE sharaNam

NC Nappinnai

 

> The correct transliteration is:

>

> SuklAmbaradharam vishNum

> SaSivarNam chaturbhujam

> prasanna vadanam dhAyEt

> sarva vignhOpaSAntayE

>

> For us, the only remover of obstacles is SrImannArAyaNa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

ramanuja, "nappinnai_nc" <nappinnai_nc>

wrote:

> Sri:

> Srimathe Ramanujaya nama:

> Dear Vinjamuri Vishnu,

> Some errors in your transliteration:-)

 

Dear Ms Nappinnai,

 

Thanks for the corrections.

I am comfortable with using "ch" for both champakam and chAyA.

 

As you have corrected, the verse is to be read as "prasanna vadanam

dhyAyEt sarva vighnOpaSAntayE".

 

adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan

Vishnu

 

> (i)do u use ch for first "ca"? If so,do you use Ch for "cha"? If u

> follow this,then it's okay. If not,then it should have been

> caturbhujam instead of chaturbhujam[ch/ca and Ch/cha].

> (ii)dhyAyEt(meditation) and not dhAyEt

> (ii)u have used first 'ga(ga)' in vignhO but it is second 'gha/Ga'

> [gh/ga and Gh/gha]

>

> But I do agree with you that even people who know samskrtham write

it

> wrongly that it can convey something totally different. At times

> transliteration is very interesting and at other times it is a pain

> in the neck!

>

> AzhvAr emperumAnAr jIyar thiruvadigaLE sharaNam

> NC Nappinnai

>

> > The correct transliteration is:

> >

> > SuklAmbaradharam vishNum

> > SaSivarNam chaturbhujam

> > prasanna vadanam dhAyEt

> > sarva vignhOpaSAntayE

> >

> > For us, the only remover of obstacles is SrImannArAyaNa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Sri Krishnaya Namah!

 

While this is being sorted out, another manthra, which has got huge

acceptance is -- "Gananam thva ganapathy......................rasadanam,

om mahaganadhipathaye namah!"

 

fyi.

 

Sukumar

 

Sri Krishnaparabrahmane Namah!

 

 

Vishnu [sMTP:vsmvishnu]

24/05/2003 7:35 PM

ramanuja

[ramanuja] Re: Shuklambaradaram Vishnum

 

ramanuja, "nappinnai_nc" <nappinnai_nc>

wrote:

> Sri:

> Srimathe Ramanujaya nama:

> Dear Vinjamuri Vishnu,

> Some errors in your transliteration:-)

 

Dear Ms Nappinnai,

 

Thanks for the corrections.

I am comfortable with using "ch" for both champakam and chAyA.

 

As you have corrected, the verse is to be read as "prasanna vadanam

dhyAyEt sarva vighnOpaSAntayE".

 

adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan

Vishnu

 

> (i)do u use ch for first "ca"? If so,do you use Ch for "cha"? If u

> follow this,then it's okay. If not,then it should have been

> caturbhujam instead of chaturbhujam[ch/ca and Ch/cha].

> (ii)dhyAyEt(meditation) and not dhAyEt

> (ii)u have used first 'ga(ga)' in vignhO but it is second 'gha/Ga'

> [gh/ga and Gh/gha]

>

> But I do agree with you that even people who know samskrtham write

it

> wrongly that it can convey something totally different. At times

> transliteration is very interesting and at other times it is a pain

> in the neck!

>

> AzhvAr emperumAnAr jIyar thiruvadigaLE sharaNam

> NC Nappinnai

>

> > The correct transliteration is:

> >

> > SuklAmbaradharam vishNum

> > SaSivarNam chaturbhujam

> > prasanna vadanam dhAyEt

> > sarva vignhOpaSAntayE

> >

> > For us, the only remover of obstacles is SrImannArAyaNa.

 

 

 

 

azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam

 

 

Your use of is subject to

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear friends,

The first sloka of Sahasranamam invokes Narayana. Vishwaksena is the

Commander in Chief of Narayana, there is a sub temple for Vishwaksena in the

second prakara of the Srirangam Temple. To equate Vishwaksena with Ganapathi

is an aberration and a lie which has been perpetuated. The second sloka

quoted is not found in any text of the Sahasranamam and is obviously an

interpolation.

Satakopan.

-

"M Karpagam" <m_karpagam

<sukumar; <Srirangasri>;

<Oppiliappan>; <ramanuja>

Wednesday, May 21, 2003 12:29 AM

Shuklambaradaram Vishnum

 

 

> I read somewhere that the complete

> "Shuklambaradaram Vishnum

> >shashivarnam...... is

>

> Shuklaambaradaram Vishnum

> shashivarnam chathurbujam

> prasanna vadanam dhiyayethe

> sarva vignopha saanthaye

>

> Gajanaana padmasana

> gajanaana mahirsham

> ane`ka dantam bakthanaama

> eka dantam upasmayema.

>

> - Karpagam.

>

>

> >sukumar <sukumar

> >"Srirangasri" <Srirangasri>,

> >Oppiliappan <Oppiliappan>, "ramanuja"

> ><ramanuja>

> > RE: the meaning of pranavam

> >Tue, 20 May 2003 19:03:10 +0530

> >

> >

> >Sri Krishnaya Namah!

> >

> >I have been looking for meaning of the sloka -- "Shuklambaradaram

Vishnum

> >shashivarnam............." As I can deduce nowhere in this sloka there

is

> >mention of Vinayaka, while there is a mention of Lord Vishnu. One of my

> >acquintances (who is a purohit) also told me that this sloka is actually

> >addressed to Lord Vishnu.

> >

> >If this is for Vinayaka, then do we have any such sloka for Lord

> >Vishwaksena, which is chanted before starting any auspicious deeds.

> >

> >

> >Sukumar

> >

> >Sri Krishnaparabrahmane Namah!

> >

> >balajiv_54 [sMTP:balajiv_54]

> >29/04/2003 6:45 PM

> >bhakti-list

> >Re: the meaning of pranavam

> >

> >dear sir,

> >iam grateful for your apt replt to the meaning of pranavam(aum or ohm)

> >i am thinking in this way.

> >ohm is the begining of all,including brahma,vishnu and shivan.it is

> >this shakti which makes all gods do their functions like brahma does

> >the job of producing,vishnu does the job of protecting and shiva does

> >the job of destroying. all the three take their orders by yogic

> >power. as lord krishna says in geetha after he shows the virata

> >roopam. he says he could show this because of the yogic power he has

> >and all that is possible because he is an avatar of vishnu.

> >

> >in sandyavandanam we invoke this ohm after doing achamanam and

> >ganpathi dhiyanam.shuklam paradharam vishnum sasivarnam

> >chathurbhujam,prasanna vadanam dhiyayeth sarva vikhnoba shanthayedh.

> >in doing pranayamam we invoke the ohmkaram

> >

> >i do not know if iam correct.the learned may guide me.

> >

> >balaji

> >

> >bhakti-list, "Ram Anbil" <Ramanbil@h...> wrote:

> > > Dear friend:

> > >

> > > As per our Siddhantam, PraNavam comprises of three

> >syllables "a", "u" and

> > > 'ma". "a" denotes Sriman Narayana. "u" represents "Thaayaar". In

> >another

> > > yojana, it is said to denote "only", since "a" itself is taken to

> >denote the

> > > divine couplle (Sriman Narayana and His inseparable Consort, Sri

> > > Mahaalakshmi") "ma" represents the Jivatma. Taken together, it

> >means that

> > > the Jeevatma exists as the servitor ONLY for the divine couple as

> >aforesaid.

> > >

> > > Swami Desikan in his "Srimad Rahasya Traya Saaram" has established

> >this

> > > truth beyond any doubt quoting appropriate PramaaNams from the

> >Vedas down to

> > > the least of our scriptures.

> >**************************

> >[ Rest clipped --Moderator]

> >

> >

> >

> >-----------------------------

> > - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -

> >To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list

> >Group Home: bhakti-list

> >Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/

> >

> >

> >Your use of is subject to

> >

> >

> >

>

> _______________

> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*

> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

>

>

>

>

>

> Srirangasri-

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...