Ramakanta contradicts himself again.

03-03-2007, 02:27 AM

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

> First please withdraw your previous challenge.
>
> "You have not proven that the only way to authorize a devotee to be a
> diksa guru in ISKCON is an order to the GBC which must have been seen by
> you."

This was not a challenge because I did not ask you to prove it. I just
stated a fact. You don't have to prove it. It is not a challenge.

> .or prove it is authorised by showing where:
>
> "Srila Prabhupada has authorised that Ramakanta das (or anyone else) can
> challenge his visible, signed directives to the GBC on the basis of
> theoretical, invisible orders."

I already answered this on Oct 6, 2006 and on Dec 10, 2006:

I am not challenging Srila Prabhupada's statement. I am challenging your
interpretation of it.

> You are contradicting yourself again since you are asking above for
> visible evidence- “a quote” -when your whole challenge to point c) (which
> is merely the logical outcome of a and b within the closed institutional
> system we are discussing) is flimsily based on the theoretical existence
> of invisible evidence.

I ignore your strange philosophy that asking you to follow Srila
Prabhupada's instruction is self-contradicting.

You have not answered following:

If you think that you don't have to follow Srila Prabhupada's instruction,
that you can present statements without having the confirm them by quotes,
then please explain why you think that.

ys Ramakanta dasa