Yosy is NOT a jnani. Yosy is Not. Period.

06-05-2005, 06:48 PM

--- In HarshaSatsangh (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com, "Emanuele De Benedetti"
wrote:
> Agreed, my dear consciousness/love
>
> Marifa
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: yosyflug
> To: HarshaSatsangh (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com
> Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [HarshaSatsangh - Ramana Guru] Why Arunachala?
>
>
>

there is no 'jnani'. though apparently possessing name and
form, this is only in the eyes of the beholder. the jnani ceased to
exist as an individual; it is the ever-present, all pervading
truth/self coming through this particular name and form. though
apparently an individual, there is no persona there - only the
unlimited consciousness/love shining unobstructed.
>
> yosy>>

I take it, dear yosy, that while I pretentiously intellectualize,
what you say above comes from your non-intellectual, non-conceptual
direct unmediated experience of "jnana" or "prajna" (just to
give "it" a "name" so that we can attempt to communicate) which
rendered your former "illusory" self non-existent, OR RATHER,
which "enabled" "you" to "see" that what you may have thought of as
your "former" self, never had existence at all.

Am I correct in THIS assessment, as I was INCORRECT in my last one?

I realize that I very well might NOT be "deserving" of an HONEST
answer, but just on the chance that PERHAPS an answer may be
forthcoming from the non-entity formerly referred to as "yosy", I
proffer my question

Gary

Jai chai!