White House IQ: brahmana, ksatriya, vaizya or zudra?

[BronxZooLila 0]

Well Folks It Looks Like This Right Wing Think Tank Has Confirmed What Many Americans Have Suspected:

Richard M Nixon Was Last Republican President To Have IQ Above MILDLY RETARDED.

It Is Really Too Bad Dan Quayle Never Made It to President.

Then Dubya JR. Would Not Have Been Listed Last In IQ

 

7-10-01 12:32 PM CST University Notes

Contributors: Cristina L. Borenstein, Lana Taamar

--

Report: President Bush Has Lowest IQ of all Presidents of past 50 Years

 

If late night TV comedy is indicator, then there has never been such widespread perception that president is not intellectually qualified for position he holds as there is with President GW Bush.

 

In report published Monday, Lovenstein Institute

of Scranton, Pennsylvania detailed its findings of four month study of intelligence quotient of President George W. Bush. Since 1973, Lovenstein Institute has published it's research to education community on each new president, which includes famous "IQ" report among others.

 

According to statements in the report, there have been 12 presidents over past 50 years, from F. D. Roosevelt to G. W. Bush who were all rated based on scholarly achievements, writings that they alone produced without aid of staff, their ability to speak with clarity, and several other psychological factors which were then scored in Swanson/Crain system of intelligence ranking.

 

The study determined following IQs of each

president as accurate to within five percentage points:

 

147 Franklin D. Roosevelt (D)

132 Harry Truman (D)

122 Dwight D. Eisenhower ®

174 John F. Kennedy (D)

126 Lyndon B. Johnson (D)

155 Richard M. Nixon ®

121 Gerald Ford ®

175 James E. Carter (D)

105 Ronald Reagan ®

098 George HW Bush ®

182 William J. Clinton (D)

091 George W. Bush ®

 

The six Republican presidents of past 50 years had average IQ of 115.5, with President Nixon having highest IQ, at 155.

 

President G. W. Bush was rated lowest of all

Republicans with IQ of 91. Six Democrat presidents had IQs with average of 156, with

President Clinton having highest IQ, at 182.

President Lyndon B. Johnson was rated lowest of all Democrats with IQ of 126.

 

No president other than Carter has released his actual IQ, 176.

 

Among comments made concerning the specific testing of President GW Bush, his low ratings were due to his apparent difficulty to command English language in public statements, his limited use of vocabulary (6,500 words for Bush versus an average of 11,000 words for other presidents), his lack of scholarly achievements other than basic MBA, and absence of any body of work which could be studied on intellectual basis. Complete report documents methods and procedures used to arrive at these ratings, including depth of sentence structure and voice stress confidence analysis.

 

"All Presidents prior to George W. Bush had

least one book under their belt, and most had written several white papers during their education or early careers. Not so with President Bush," Dr. Lovenstein

said. "He has no published works or writings, so in many ways that made it more difficult to arrive at assessment. We had to rely more heavily on transcripts of his unscripted public speaking."

 

The Lovenstein Institute of Scranton Pennsylvania think tank includes high caliber historians, psychiatrists, sociologists, scientists in human

behavior, and psychologists. Among their ranks are Dr. Werner R. Lovenstein, world-renowned sociologist, and Professor Patricia F. Dilliams, world-respected psychiatrist.

 

This study was commissioned on February 13, 2001 and released on July 9, 2001 to subscribing member universities and organizations within education community

http://207.69.141.215/BushIQ.shtml

=====

Amerika's Betrayal

On December 12, 2000, 5 Republicans on Supreme Court nullified 105 million votes to declare George W. Bush as President. Vincent Bugliosi takes his place in pantheon of patriots with his powerful, brilliant, and courageous expose of a crime committed by highest court in land.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/156025355X/impeageorgwbush

[Guest guest]

Tarun, Urban Legend Alert: be prepared for dumb democrats to brag about this FAKE study...

 

And if Clinton was so smart - how did he get caught with an intern?

 

We actually have some real data in the form of GWB's SAT scores, which were at the 88% level. I suspect this is a great deal higher than that of many, if not most, of the dembulbs who criticize him for his supposed low IQ. I also suspect few of them would last a week at Harvard Business School.

 

About the authors:

 

Cristina L. Borenstein and Lana Taamar are both recently off the campaign trail where they served as receptionists for the Pennsylvania chapter of Gore For President, Inc., and have co-written the eBook Gore Got Gored. Together they publish the The Pennsylvania Court Observer which has a

circulation of 5.

 

Dr. Lovenstein lives in a mobile home in Scranton, Pennsylvania with his long time companion Patricia F. Dilliams. When the two are not publishing reports for their Lovenstein Institute, they run an internet business www.collegedegreesforsale.com

 

Rush is right, you liberals get funnier every moment when you're out of power! LOL!

 

Try again, Tarun.

[Tarun 6]

Hey Tandem Random, Long time no megabyte!

I didn't post this one. Lila dd from Central Bronx did.

She came to Puruji's program Saturday Night. Try again.

However, I'm no liberal. Rush is light years to my left.

What makes you think Clinton was caught?

I though you knew something about Amerikan politics.

As I told you before, if Bushwhacker can reduce abortion, more power to him.

If he allots gov't laxmi to churches who do good work, very nice.

But if those gov't supported churches serve slaughtered animals at their festivals, it becomes vikarma-phalam; we all become somewhat implicated.

Apart from that, what else on his agenda is even remotely Vedik?

I do wish him luck.

ps - That illiterate Gita-reading South Indian brahmaNa may have scored low on his IQ test too.

Zriman MahAprabhu was no psychometrician.

[Guest guest]

<h2>A stunning triumph for George W.</h2> Wesley Pruden

THE WASHINGTON TIMES</p> <font SIZE=1>Published 7/24/01</font></p> <hr>

 

George W. put the spike to a cherished stereotype in Genoa.

 

He arrived at the G-8 summit as the Texas bumpkin who wouldn't know a foreign affair from a Friday-night flirtation in the back row at the last picture show.

 

When everybody packed up and moved on to Rome the stereotype was in tatters. So was the out-of-date ABM Treaty -- the Bible, the Talmud, the Koran of the arms-control lobby.

 

George W. did it by hanging tough, by insisting that he would build the missile shield to protect America whether the Europeans, who have never been able to manage their own affairs, like it or not. The breakthrough was dramatic, and on America's terms.

 

This is the toughness, the perseverance, the determination that persuaded Vladimir Putin, the only European whose opinion actually matters since he has 6,000 missiles and the other guys, the Germans and the French who have caused the rest of the world so much grief over the past century, don't.

 

But not just the Germans and the French. There's a frightened industry right here at home, the arms-control experts whose futures are tied to keeping the world locked in mutual terror. This is the protection racket Al Capone used to intimidate Chicago 75 years ago. If George W.'s missile shield does what it promises to do there won't be any missiles left to control. Everything the clutch of arms-control experts in Washington knows will have been repealed. No more highly paid consultancies, no more seminars at luxury resorts (mostly at taxpayer expense), no more learned gasbaggery for the op-ed pages of the New York Times and The Washington Post. Strobe Talbott, get a job.

 

It wasn't supposed to happen this way. George W. was just a Texas cowboy, the callow eldest son who was out of his depth in the world at large. He wasn't smart enough to know that when a president goes overseas he's supposed to sit through interminable meetings, saying the obvious things the experts have prepared for him, doing nothing to upset the established and sterile way of doing things.

 

The Bush triumph was so unexpected that nobody quite knew what to make of it. The media elites retreated into familiar cliches. The Washington Post and the New York Times could hardly bring themselves to state the obvious, that the ABM Treaty was left mortally wounded, and already beginning to give off a distinct aroma.

 

Because he didn't know any better, George W. approached the Russians as he might have approached another owner looking for a trade: "You want our Hall of Fame third baseman who may be the next Brooks Robinson, it'll cost you. We want two first-string pitchers, a utility infielder and two minor-leaguers to be named later. Take it or leave it. You've got my telephone number."

 

His performance at Genoa ought to be a lesson for himself as well, teaching him that staking out strong positions and sticking to them may be a very un-Republican way of doing things but it invariably pays off. The Europeans, figuring a treaty that would hobble American industry could teach their upstart cousins a thing or two, are trying to shame us (Bonn's trying to shame anyone for anything for a thousand years offers a new definition of chutzpah) into accepting the Kyoto treaty once rejected by 95 United States senators, including nearly all the Democrats. Hanging tough forced the Europeans into a corner, where they could only make a show of saying they'll abide by Kyoto even if the United States won't. (If they really mean it, we won't have to.)

 

But it was the missile shield, Ronald Reagan's much-derided "star wars" that critics are scrambling to find credible arguments against in the wake of the latest test results, that is the triumph of Genoa. Some of the president's critics so far can manage only a splutter. "This can give Bush great political cover and minimize criticism from at home and abroad -- if it's serious," said one of them, who consoled himself with an odd "but": George W. has now abandoned his earlier position that Moscow's views were irrelevant.

 

Well, yes. After your adversary comes around to your point of view, there's no point in pursuing his abandoned argument.

 

Vladimir Putin understands this, and further recognizes what some of Mr. Bush's critics in the West insist they do not, that the world has changed and so has the way the world's leaders must deal with the changed reality. And so, too, the rest of the world's assessment of the vision thing of the new president of the United States.

 

"It seemed to me," the Russian leader said, "that his mental reasoning is very deep, very profound. Both of us are aiming at partnership."

 

Not a bad day's work in any language.</p>

[Tarun 6]

SAdhu-bhUSaNam Bush ki jaya!

SAdhu-bhUSaNam Bush ki jaya!

[Kulapavana 0]

While an important factor, intelligence as measured by IQ (intelligence quotient) is not a sole factor in determining one's varna. The prevalence of a particular mode of nature (goodness, passion or ignorance) determines the varna. It is very safe to assume that GW Bush is dominated by ignorance.

[Tarun 6]

They r neither liberal nor conservative, simply animal. Less than animal.

Our present foreign policy proves these people now in charge don't even care... don't give a hoot about this country or any other... only their own particular investments at home or abroad.

Their contribution to Kaliyuga is clear:

destabilize everything they don't already own while totally polluting bhumir apo'nalo vayuH kham mamo buddhir... thus brainwashing everyone's ahankar further still.

According to Yogi Berra: "It's dejA vu all over again"

So many Dvivida Gorillas, Hiranyakasipus, KaMsas, RAvanas

back in office.

Chaindog's resemblance to KumbhakarNa's uncanny, no?

One hope & one hope only: they can all b delivered by KRSNa-kIrtan & SAdhu-sanga.

And of course, Patita-pAvan's prasAd.

[Kulapavana 0]

"One hope & one hope only: they can all b delivered by KRSNa-kIrtan & SAdhu-sanga"

Demons should simply be avoided. We are not powerful enough to help them and risk getting contaminated by such contact. As one of my devotee friends said: "Dont step into stool and expect to purify it"