Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
atanu

Lord is One

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

"from me.. ok?"

 

 

OK Boss. I will accept your commandment. But only problem is that you interpret Gita in fashions that contradict Rig Veda very often.

 

 

In another thread you said:

 

Individual soul is CIT.

 

Now in this thread you say:

 

 

There is me the idiot, you the scientist and Krishna ---- one, two, three.

 

That means your CIT is idiot. Or that you are not CIT.

 

 

Contradictions galore

 

Atanu

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I think it says in Srimad Bhagavatam that Vyasa compiled the Puranas for better understanding for people in this age of Kali...

 

So we must follow the Puranas, because it is meant for Age of Kali...i.e. us!!

 

And among the Puranas, only Srimad Bhagavatam claims to be 'the cream of Vedic literature'...so that should be our authority...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yajur Veda

 

iv. 5. 5.

a Homage to Bhava and to Rudra.

b Homage to Çarva -----------.

f Homage to him who haunteth the mountains, and to Çipivista.

g --------------.

I Homage to the chief, and to the first.

m -----------------.

 

Note: Rudra is Carva. Carva is all. Rudra is Cipivista

 

 

 

Mind cannot confirm Shruti. If you had read the thread from the beginning then this question would not have arisen.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hare Krishna,

 

 

iv. 5. 5.

a Homage to Bhava and to Rudra.

b Homage to Çarva -----------.

 

 

 

Sarva is one of the eleven Rudras. So it is not surprising to call Lord Rudra as Sarva. This is the mukhyartha. Also if you read Sri Rudram fully one can easily understand that all the Rudras including Lord Shiva is praised, else how do you explain the verse "homage to Bhava and to Rudra". Note the two different names refer to two different entities here.

 

The hidden meaning is that all names in Vedas refer to Shri Hari only.

 

So your verses clearly show just the opposite of what you say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

"The hidden meaning is that all names in Vedas refer to Shri Hari only."

 

 

Do not state. Show with shruti proof.

 

Rudra is Bhava and Rudra is Sarva. You can see 108 and 1008 names of Rudra.

 

Rudras are not Rudra. Rudras include Maruts. In Rig Veda, Rudras and Rudra are distinctly spoken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read Shree Rudram, you will find that Rudra is all, including Vishnu.

 

But I do not have any problem with your position. It is a question of whether the sub stratum gives rise to all pervading and swift Vishnu or the other way round.

 

 

I remember a fight my daughter had with another kid of her age. My daughter kept saying " The Sun is 'peela'". The other kid kept on repeating: "No, the Sun is yellow. But finally the Sun is Sun.

 

 

All scriptures state that the unchanging substratum is Brahman. Mind (Indra) emerges from that. He brings in waters (Goddesses) and from the waters emerge Vishnu. Dragon of the deep (Ahirbudhnaya) still is there as the sub stratum.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hare Krishna,

 

 

"The hidden meaning is that all names in Vedas refer to Shri Hari only."

 

Do not state. Show with shruti proof.

 

 

Should I state Visnusahasranama and Visvakarma Sukta of Rig Veda. Go and read that.

 

 

Rudra is Bhava and Rudra is Sarva. You can see 108 and 1008 names of Rudra.

 

 

There are many bogus Gitas like Gamesha gita etc. and also bogus shasranamas.

 

 

Rudras are not Rudra. Rudras include Maruts. In Rig Veda, Rudras and Rudra are distinctly spoken.

 

 

Yes, Rudras are not Rudra and vice versa. Advaita does not make sense here or anywhere. Any way the real translation of the relevant verse is as folows.

 

namashsarva yacha pashupataye cha

 

Salutations to Him who destroys sins and Him who protects beings in fetters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hare Krishna,

 

 

If you read Shree Rudram, you will find that Rudra is all, including Vishnu.

 

 

Nowhere it is said so to my knowledge.

 

Namo giri shayacha shipivistayacha

 

Some interprest this verse to refer to Visnu(Sipivishta). So there is not much proof in this regard.

 

 

All scriptures state that the unchanging substratum is Brahman. Mind (Indra) emerges from that. He brings in waters (Goddesses) and from the waters emerge Vishnu. Dragon of the deep (Ahirbudhnaya) still is there as the sub stratum.

 

 

Good theory on substratum, but really there is no basis in Shrutis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

In another thread you said:

Individual soul is CIT.

Now in this thread you say:

There is me the idiot, you the scientist and Krishna ---- one, two, three.

That means your CIT is idiot. Or that you are not CIT.

 

 

we are CIT because god gives us this feature... but, if we come in this world wih the purpose to forget him (actually all of us have done like that), he fulfills our desire to be forgetful blinding us with his maya energy.

 

So we are CIT because god has made us cit.. but now we are blinded because he has fulfilled our desire

 

no contraddiction

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Yajur Veda i. 4. 36.

 

a Çitta with the sinew, Bhava with the liver, Rudra with the taniman, Paçupati with the thick heart, Agni with the heart, Rudra with the blood, Çarva with the kidneys, Mahadeva with the intestinal flesh, him that slayest most quickly with the entrails

 

 

Yajur Veda i. 8. 15.

a Thou art the bolt of Indra, slaying foes; with thee may he slay his foe.

b ------

c Thou art the stepping of Visnu, thou art the step of Visnu, thou art the stride of Visnu

d On the instigation of the Maruts may I conquer.

e Be mind ready.

f May I be united with power and strength. (Shiva and Shakti)

g Thou art the spirit of cattle; like them may my spirit be.

h ------------

 

 

Atanu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

There is only one boss.

 

 

I said earlier that Yes we have met. You took a long time.

 

 

The differences are minor.

 

Atanu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

sorry but i do not understand what you are saying and what it has to do with our discussion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

"As for Lord Visnu, it is clearly stated in Vedas that HE always existed and even before Lord Rudra took birth from Lord Brahma's Head.

 

1.156.02 He who presents (offerings) to Vis.n.u, the ancient, the creator, the recent, the self-born; he who celebrates the great birth of that mighty one; he verily possessed of abundance, attains (the station) that is to be sought (by all). [s'ravobhir yujyam cidabhyasat, by food, or by fame, he attains whatsoever is to be joined with; to complete the ellipse: annairyuktah san sarvair gantavyam tat padam gacchati]."

 

 

In the verse cited it is stated: he who celebrates the great birth of that mighty one;

 

So, there is birth of the mighty one. Whereas, the other one is unborn.

 

The second point relates to reference to birth of Rudra from Brahma'sa head.

 

 

It was not a birth as you would like to depict. Brahma had no control of the event. Shambu appeared to punish Brahma.

 

Similarly Shambu as halo takes birth from Vishnu's forehead.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...