Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

John,

You hit the nail on the head. Knowing the data of pattern discrimination,

points, channels, herbs and prescriptions needs the broader canvas of the

theoretical foundations rooted in the teachings of great physicians ancient and

modern. This is what gives meaning and inspiration to Chinese medicine.

 

 

On Dec 14, 2009, at 10:47 PM, wrote:

 

> I think that TCM is like looking at a pointalist painting from six inches

> off of the canvas,

> instead of taking a few steps back to see the big picture. We have all of

> the dots to memorize, repeat and all of the steps to memorize and repeat,

> without the connections and the meaning between thousands of years of

> conscious and subconscious development.

> That's why it's essential to make the classics the axis of all of our work,

> where the spokes coming off of them are up to interpretation, innovation and

> practice.

>

> K

>

> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:38 PM, <zrosenbe wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > Absolutely, I agree with you. The living stream of Chinese medicine is

> > rooted in the classical literature. But it seems in this discussion overall

> > we are seeking for a brand name for what we do, and the term " TCM " didn't

> > appear until the modern era. .

> >

> >

> >

> > On Dec 14, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Eric Rosenbush wrote:

> >

>

>

 

 

Chair, Department of Herbal Medicine

Pacific College of Oriental Medicine

San Diego, Ca. 92122

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

The problem of naming something so vast as this medicine brings to mind Ch1

of Dao De Jing (Tao Te Ching). One might surrender to the fact that the

timeless beauty and ever-blossoming diversity of our medicine simply cannot

be captured by a simple name?

 

 

(*The dao that can be named is not the eternal dao.

The name that can be named is not the eternal name.

The unnamable is the eternally real.

Naming is the origin of all particular things.

Free from desire, you realize the mystery.

Caught in desire, you see only the manifestations.

Yet mystery and manifestations arise from the same source.

This source is called darkness.

Darkness within darkness.

The gateway to all understanding.

* <Stephen Mitchell's translation>

 

another translation, with chinese text for reference --

http://www.thetao.info/english/page1.htm)

 

 

~edith

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Don, Thank you so much for sharing your experience with us. Its very clear

to me that you are a creative thinker. I would love to know more about how you

bill through a doctor, and in particular how you convince them to get on board

with you (eg: what do they have to gain, aside from the obvious benefit to their

patients'?). I have often thought about connecting with an MD so that we could

help each other benefit from the other's medicine. For instance, there are

times when chinese herbs for an acute condition give some people insomnia and

the herbs that would help would be too tonifying for the current condition. I

would love to have an MD around who could prescribe a sleeping pill for a week

so that we can clear up the acute condition.

 

If you would prefer to talk about this privately, I would love to hear from you:

 

heylaurag

 

 

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine , Donald Snow <don83407

wrote:

>

>

> I really did not know what I was doing until about 3 years ago. I had been

perfecting my MET/integrated medicine methodology and had treated about 1000

hours or so without any remuneration. I could not see charging a patient when I

couldn't guarantee the results. After that initial experimentation period I

could consistantly (95%+) get resolution of any pain, neuropathy, or pathology

and decided I would begin charging patients. At first I took only cash patients

and charged $250 per treatment; and I got paid, too. But I noticed I was only

getting a particular class of patient and felt that what I did should be

available to all who desired it. (at this time I was practicing in San Diego

and teaching at PCOM)

>

>

>

> In 2007 I got an opportunity to move back home to Louisiana and I took a job

offered by an MD. These folks burned me very badly and they stole money and

they tried to steal my methodology. However, what I learned from this is that I

could actually bill insurance for my treatments (that lesson cost me about

$200,000 or more). Thereafter, I teamed up with another MD and billed insurance

under his/her license; and got paid. I also got a contract to service 29

hospitals but it has taken be around 8 months to figure out how to bill. I now

have that figured out and have hired my first AOM practitioner and she has just

completed her training with me and I will put her in our first hospital. But I

have digressed a little.

>

>

>

> I was able to bill right at $500,000 my first year working by myself, but had

to have two assistants helping me. I collected 80% of my billing (which is real

good, by the way). You must also understand this. The reason hospitals do not

want acupuncture is that there is no money in it at $50 to $80 per treatment.

Hospitals are a business and they need to make money. When I treat a patient I

get a minimum of $150 up to more than $400 for some patients. The downside is

that it takes me 1 to 2.5 hours to treat one patient (now you know why I need

assistants trained in my copyrighted methodology). I am very stingy in who I

show my methodology and have a full time lawyer on my staff to take care of

contracts. I don't give it away. My patients get well in a dramatic and

profound way; even those with " irreversible " nerve damage. The results are

immediate and if a patient does not get the promised results, they do not pay.

Needless to say, I get paid. In the last year I have returned money 4 times out

of over 3000 patient visits.

>

>

>

> I now have another AOM practitioner working with me and we will see what I can

bill and collect now; however, it is yet to be seen.

>

>

>

> So folks, that's it in a nut shell. I answered this same question last year

on this same site and I doubt that I will answer it again. Hope this satisfies

you.

>

>

>

> Sincerely,

>

>

>

> Don J. Snow, DAOM, MPH, L.Ac

>

>

>

> P.S. As for the question " Do you use herbs? " The answer is yes. But not

nearly as often and I know longer use a compounding pharmacy. I use

teapill/patents. The methodology I use precludes my having to rely on herbs as

much, but I use them when I must. The patient must get better or I don't get

paid so I do whatever must be done to get the desired results. djs

>

>

>

> Chinese Medicine

> heylaurag

> Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:32:30 +0000

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

>

>

>

>

> Hi Don, With that much education, I suspect you are in a similar position as

me--LOTS of student loans. I paid for my undergrad plus a masters in social work

from an expensive ivy league school plus the dual masters in acupuncture and

herbs with student loans. Then I was dumb enough not to start paying on it right

after I graduated (actually I couldn't afford to). So I also accumulated massive

interest. But...I really want to get a doctorate!

>

> But I do work in a very deep way with the herbs, so I am not completely

convinced that a doctorate would educate me more than my own schooling by

practicing the medicine. Any thoughts on this? Also, how do you see enough

patients to make that much money if you also practice herbs (which take time)?

Do you have employees? Do you bill insurance? How much time do you spend with

each patient? I'd like to learn from you, so I appreciate anything that you can

share.

>

> Working on taxes this year I am dismayed to discover just how little I

actually make when I take my student loan payments into consideration. But I

turn down new patients all the time because I don't feel I have the time to see

them. So I must be doing something wrong.

>

> Thanks!

>

> Laura

>

> Chinese Medicine , Donald Snow <don83407@>

wrote:

> >

> >

> > Yes, definitions. Who defines what is being discussed? I practice integral

medicine no matter what one may believe. That's what I call it and that is what

my patients believe and that's what I do. I don't follow any " man " such a Lonny,

Master Tong, etc. I follow my own path in finding the answers to our wonderful

medicine and I make it what I will. This is what I do. If I followed a

particular man or style, then that's what I would be doing. But I practice Dr.

Snow's Acupuncture and Integrated Medical Systems.

> >

> > I make a mid-six figure income doing what I do so I'm doing something right.

I went the extra mile and earned the DAOM, MPH, MS, etc. so I am relatively

educated. And no matter what anyone says about that degree (esp. those that

haven't actually done it), we delved into the classics at a much deeper level

that the master's program. I'm a better practitioner for it. And most of all, I

have a very high success in treatment rate which is why I have a booming

practice. One is a technician until he makes the medicine his own. That applies

to martial arts as well. I've seen many so-called masters that were not because

they did not make the art a part of themselves.

> >

> >

> >

> > Well, these are only my opinions and I guess we all have one.

> >

> >

> >

> > Sincerely,

> >

> >

> >

> > Don Snow, DAOM, MPH, L.Ac.

> >

> >

> >

> > Chinese Medicine

> > johnkokko@

> > Sun, 13 Dec 2009 06:24:06 -0800

> > Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Yes... we all practice medicine,

> > but " integral " and " integrative " medicine are 2 different birds.

> >

> > Very few people practice " integral " medicine, as Lonny can elaborate on.

> > We all practice some form of " integrative " medicine, because that's what we

> > learned in schools... a combination of many styles derived from 2 millennia

> > of changes.

> > That's why I opted for " integrative Chinese medicine " being the most honest

> > and comprehensive name for what we do.

> >

> > K

> >

> > On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Donald Snow <don83407@> wrote:

> >

> > >

> > > Actually, what we practice is medicine. What you appear to want defined is

> > > the style, type, or founding root of what we do. I practice integral

> > > medicine. I apply TCM/OM theory to MET and SCENAR then combine it with our

> > > TCM using specific methodology. But as f

> >

> > r as my patients are concerned, I practice medicine because they get better

> > > very quickly. Oh semantics...

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Don

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Chinese Medicine

> > > johnkokko@

> > > Sun, 13 Dec 2009 06:12:13 -0800

> > > Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Global medicine sounds too " global " ,

> > > Chinese medicine might sound too " local " .

> > > " Global " ? GCM?

> > >

> > > I actually like calling what we do Chinese medicine,

> > > because it gives credit to the myriad of tribes/clans/villages of people

> > > who

> > > developed the classics which are the foundation of

> > > Korean/Japanese/Vietnamese/European/American acupuncture and formula

> > > systems. We can break down the word " Chinese " , which is probably not

> > > sufficient to describe these originators, since even today, China

> > > geographically holds over 50 distinct ethnic groups, but it's the best

that

> > > we've got.

> > >

> > > K

> > >

> > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Donald Snow <don83407@> wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > > > How about naming our medicine modern " Global Medicine? "

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Don Snow, DAOM, MPH, LAc

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Chinese Medicine

> > > > Revolution@

> > > > Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:18:12 +0000

> > > > Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > John,

> > > >

> > > > I'm happy calling it Chinese medicine. But I think the real challenge is

> > > to

> > > > find a name that references it's present and future rather than its

past.

> > > > Many of the most significant advances in the medicine have been made in

> > > the

> > > > West in the last 60 years. It's a global medicine now being practiced

> > > > according to many different value systems across cultures at different

> > > > levels of development. It's interesting to consider who we are and what

> > > we

> > > > are really doing. Most of us aren't, in fact, practicing " Chinese "

> > > medicine.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

If you only perform acupuncture and internal medicine it will do you no good to

bill through a doctor since you will not make much money doing just acupuncture

and CM. That is the reason they do no want us in the hospitals. To get a

hospital or MD interested in you, you must have some type of financial track

record to present to the physician or hospital. Most of our associates cannot

produce the tax records or bank financial statements to prove this type of track

record. I can produce these documents. The only way you can get an MD or

hospital on board is through the mighty dollar. I give them a percentage. But

you must be careful how you do this because it is illegal to share percentages

in many cases. Therefore, I give a nice percentage for their billing expertise

and department. In other words, you must rent the MD's license or lease

yourself or your assistants through the MD. I have a full-time lawyer on staff

and he takes care of these things for me.

 

 

 

As for needing the MD for temporary presciptions, I have never used their

services in that way. However, I do refer red flag cases to them when

necessary. I also have never needed them to refer anyone to me, although that

might be nice if patients are not refering to you, although that's another

problem. My patients refer back to be in a big way. Indeed, I've had patients

come to me from Russia, Germany, Canada, Italy, Trinidad and Tobago, and many

other overseas countries along with patients coming from many states. Many also

drive 3 -4 hours within my current state to see me and they often come 2 to 3

times a week in the begining. My patients get better very quickly and very

dramatically from the first day of treatment.

 

 

 

I do not use just acupuncture and herbal medicine. I use integral medicine that

is my own proprietary methodology. This is what I can bill through insurance.

Mostly, the patient pays cash for the acupuncture but insurance pays the rest.

I also have a money back policy. If I can't relieve 50% or more of your pain or

active symtoms at the end of the first treatment, you don't pay one thin dime.

Surprisingly, I've only retuned money 4 times in 7 years of practice.

 

 

 

In summary, it probably won't do you any good to team up with an MD armed only

with the knowledge you get from our OM medical schools. However, I am looking

for AOM practitioners to train in my methodologies to place under MDs or

hospitals. The catch is, you often must be willing to move to take part in

this. The good thing is, you will not starve to death doing what I do.

 

 

 

Hope this helps. I am quite surprised at how few people are interested in what

I am doing. It is no wonder we are in such bad shape politically. The world is

our apple. All we have to do is simply pluck them.

 

 

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

Dr. Don J. Snow, DAOM, MPH, L.Ac.

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine

heylaurag

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:47:39 +0000

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

 

 

 

 

 

Hi Don, Thank you so much for sharing your experience with us. Its very clear to

me that you are a creative thinker. I would love to know more about how you bill

through a doctor, and in particular how you convince them to get on board with

you (eg: what do they have to gain, aside from the obvious benefit to their

patients'?). I have often thought about connecting with an MD so that we could

help each other benefit from the other's medicine. For instance, there are times

when chinese herbs for an acute condition give some people insomnia and the

herbs that would help would be too tonifying for the current condition. I would

love to have an MD around who could prescribe a sleeping pill for a week so that

we can clear up the acute condition.

 

If you would prefer to talk about this privately, I would love to hear from you:

 

heylaurag

 

Chinese Medicine , Donald Snow <don83407

wrote:

>

>

> I really did not know what I was doing until about 3 years ago. I had been

perfecting my MET/integrated medicine methodology and had treated about 1000

hours or so without any remuneration. I could not see charging a patient when I

couldn't guarantee the results. After that initial experimentation period I

could consistantly (95%+) get resolution of any pain, neuropathy, or pathology

and decided I would begin charging patients. At first I took only cash patients

and charged $250 per treatment; and I got paid, too. But I noticed I was only

getting a particular class of patient and felt that what I did should be

available to all who desired it. (at this time I was practicing in San Diego and

teaching at PCOM)

>

>

>

> In 2007 I got an opportunity to move back home to Louisiana and I took a job

offered by an MD. These folks burned me very badly and they stole money and they

tried to steal my methodology. However, what I learned from this is that I could

actually bill insurance for my treatments (that lesson cost me about $200,000 or

more). Thereafter, I teamed up with another MD and billed insurance under

his/her license; and got paid. I also got a contract to service 29 hospitals but

it has taken be around 8 months to figure out how to bill. I now have that

figured out and have hired my first AOM practitioner and she has just completed

her training with me and I will put her in our first hospital. But I have

digressed a little.

>

>

>

> I was able to bill right at $500,000 my first year working by myself, but had

to have two assistants helping me. I collected 80% of my billing (which is real

good, by the way). You must also understand this. The reason hospitals do not

want acupuncture is that there is no money in it at $50 to $80 per treatment.

Hospitals are a business and they need to make money. When I treat a patient I

get a minimum of $150 up to more than $400 for some patients. The downside is

that it takes me 1 to 2.5 hours to treat one patient (now you know why I need

assistants trained in my copyrighted methodology). I am very stingy in who I

show my methodology and have a full time lawyer on my staff to take care of

contracts. I don't give it away. My patients get well in a dramatic and profound

way; even those with " irreversible " nerve damage. The results are immediate and

if a patient does not get the promised results, they do not pay. Needless to

say, I get paid. In the last year I have returned money 4 times out of over 3000

patient visits.

>

>

>

> I now have another AOM practitioner working with me and we will see what I can

bill and collect now; however, it is yet to be seen.

>

>

>

> So folks, that's it in a nut shell. I answered this same question last year on

this same site and I doubt that I will answer it again. Hope this satisfies you.

>

>

>

> Sincerely,

>

>

>

> Don J. Snow, DAOM, MPH, L.Ac

>

>

>

> P.S. As for the question " Do you use herbs? " The answer is yes. But not nearly

as often and I know longer use a compounding pharmacy. I use teapill/patents.

The methodology I use precludes my having to rely on herbs as much, but I use

them when I must. The patient must get better or I don't get paid so I do

whatever must be done to get the desired results. djs

>

>

>

> Chinese Medicine

> heylaurag

> Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:32:30 +0000

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

>

>

>

>

> Hi Don, With that much education, I suspect you are in a similar position as

me--LOTS of student loans. I paid for my undergrad plus a masters in social work

from an expensive ivy league school plus the dual masters in acupuncture and

herbs with student loans. Then I was dumb enough not to start paying on it right

after I graduated (actually I couldn't afford to). So I also accumulated massive

interest. But...I really want to get a doctorate!

>

> But I do work in a very deep way with the herbs, so I am not completely

convinced that a doctorate would educate me more than my own schooling by

practicing the medicine. Any thoughts on this? Also, how do you see enough

patients to make that much money if you also practice herbs (which take time)?

Do you have employees? Do you bill insurance? How much time do you spend with

each patient? I'd like to learn from you, so I appreciate anything that you can

share.

>

> Working on taxes this year I am dismayed to discover just how little I

actually make when I take my student loan payments into consideration. But I

turn down new patients all the time because I don't feel I have the time to see

them. So I must be doing something wrong.

>

> Thanks!

>

> Laura

>

> Chinese Medicine , Donald Snow <don83407@>

wrote:

> >

> >

> > Yes, definitions. Who defines what is being discussed? I practice integral

medicine no matter what one may believe. That's what I call it and that is what

my patients believe and that's what I do. I don't follow any " man " such a Lonny,

Master Tong, etc. I follow my own path in finding the answers to our wonderful

medicine and I make it what I will. This is what I do. If I followed a

particular man or style, then that's what I would be doing. But I practice Dr.

Snow's Acupuncture and Integrated Medical Systems.

> >

> > I make a mid-six figure income doing what I do so I'm doing something right.

I went the extra mile and earned the DAOM, MPH, MS, etc. so I am relatively

educated. And no matter what anyone says about that degree (esp. those that

haven't actually done it), we delved into the classics at a much deeper level

that the master's program. I'm a better practitioner for it. And most of all, I

have a very high success in treatment rate which is why I have a booming

practice. One is a technician until he makes the medicine his own. That applies

to martial arts as well. I've seen many so-called masters that were not because

they did not make the art a part of themselves.

> >

> >

> >

> > Well, these are only my opinions and I guess we all have one.

> >

> >

> >

> > Sincerely,

> >

> >

> >

> > Don Snow, DAOM, MPH, L.Ac.

> >

> >

> >

> > Chinese Medicine

> > johnkokko@

> > Sun, 13 Dec 2009 06:24:06 -0800

> > Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Yes... we all practice medicine,

> > but " integral " and " integrative " medicine are 2 different birds.

> >

> > Very few people practice " integral " medicine, as Lonny can elaborate on.

> > We all practice some form of " integrative " medicine, because that's what we

> > learned in schools... a combination of many styles derived from 2 millennia

> > of changes.

> > That's why I opted for " integrative Chinese medicine " being the most honest

> > and comprehensive name for what we do.

> >

> > K

> >

> > On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Donald Snow <don83407@> wrote:

> >

> > >

> > > Actually, what we practice is medicine. What you appear to want defined is

> > > the style, type, or founding root of what we do. I practice integral

> > > medicine. I apply TCM/OM theory to MET and SCENAR then combine it with our

> > > TCM using specific methodology. But as f

> >

> > r as my patients are concerned, I practice medicine because they get better

> > > very quickly. Oh semantics...

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Don

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Chinese Medicine

> > > johnkokko@

> > > Sun, 13 Dec 2009 06:12:13 -0800

> > > Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Global medicine sounds too " global " ,

> > > Chinese medicine might sound too " local " .

> > > " Global " ? GCM?

> > >

> > > I actually like calling what we do Chinese medicine,

> > > because it gives credit to the myriad of tribes/clans/villages of people

> > > who

> > > developed the classics which are the foundation of

> > > Korean/Japanese/Vietnamese/European/American acupuncture and formula

> > > systems. We can break down the word " Chinese " , which is probably not

> > > sufficient to describe these originators, since even today, China

> > > geographically holds over 50 distinct ethnic groups, but it's the best

that

> > > we've got.

> > >

> > > K

> > >

> > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Donald Snow <don83407@> wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > > > How about naming our medicine modern " Global Medicine? "

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Don Snow, DAOM, MPH, LAc

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Chinese Medicine

> > > > Revolution@

> > > > Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:18:12 +0000

> > > > Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > John,

> > > >

> > > > I'm happy calling it Chinese medicine. But I think the real challenge is

> > > to

> > > > find a name that references it's present and future rather than its

past.

> > > > Many of the most significant advances in the medicine have been made in

> > > the

> > > > West in the last 60 years. It's a global medicine now being practiced

> > > > according to many different value systems across cultures at different

> > > > levels of development. It's interesting to consider who we are and what

> > > we

> > > > are really doing. Most of us aren't, in fact, practicing " Chinese "

> > > medicine.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Don:

 

Reading between the lines what you are saying is along with acupuncture you use

modalities that a western physician, nurse or therapist might use and its billed

under the MD so you can get the highest possible revenue because the insurance

company is viewing it as under the MD? Is this an accurate understanding?

 

thanks,

david

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

The gain could simply be profits, reputation or ?

 

Michael W. Bowser, DC, LAc

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine

heylaurag

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:47:39 +0000

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

 

 

 

 

 

Hi Don, Thank you so much for sharing your experience with us. Its very clear to

me that you are a creative thinker. I would love to know more about how you bill

through a doctor, and in particular how you convince them to get on board with

you (eg: what do they have to gain, aside from the obvious benefit to their

patients'?). I have often thought about connecting with an MD so that we could

help each other benefit from the other's medicine. For instance, there are times

when chinese herbs for an acute condition give some people insomnia and the

herbs that would help would be too tonifying for the current condition. I would

love to have an MD around who could prescribe a sleeping pill for a week so that

we can clear up the acute condition.

 

If you would prefer to talk about this privately, I would love to hear from you:

 

heylaurag

 

 

 

_______________

Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.

http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

That's pretty much what I've been saying. I see what I do as needle-less

acupuncture but it is billed as physical medicine. The equipment I use has been

around since the late 70's and 80's, except for the SCENARs. The only

difference is the results that I get compared to those of PT's and MDs. That's

the reason for my patient load.

 

 

 

Don SNow

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine

singlewhip2001

Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:54:50 +0000

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

 

 

 

 

 

Hi Don:

 

Reading between the lines what you are saying is along with acupuncture you use

modalities that a western physician, nurse or therapist might use and its billed

under the MD so you can get the highest possible revenue because the insurance

company is viewing it as under the MD? Is this an accurate understanding?

 

thanks,

david

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Don,

 

 

 

How hard was it to find an MD willing to work with you and did they accept your

theoretical concepts quickly?

 

Michael W. Bowser, DC, LAc

 

 

 

 

 

> Chinese Traditional Medicine

> don83407

> Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:07:11 -0600

> RE: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

>

> That's pretty much what I've been saying. I see what I do as needle-less

acupuncture but it is billed as physical medicine. The equipment I use has been

around since the late 70's and 80's, except for the SCENARs. The only difference

is the results that I get compared to those of PT's and MDs. That's the reason

for my patient load.

>

>

>

> Don SNow

>

>

>

> Chinese Medicine

> singlewhip2001

> Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:54:50 +0000

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

>

>

>

>

> Hi Don:

>

> Reading between the lines what you are saying is along with acupuncture you

use modalities that a western physician, nurse or therapist might use and its

billed under the MD so you can get the highest possible revenue because the

insurance company is viewing it as under the MD? Is this an accurate

understanding?

>

> thanks,

> david

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I don't really think they care whether the patient improves or not. It appears

to be about money and how much they can make. I have yet to find an MD that

wants to have acupuncture in their clinics because they believe in it, although

I know some AOM associates that have found MD's to work with that appear to be

open. I've found it is about the dollar.

 

 

 

Don Snow

 

 

 

Chinese Traditional Medicine

naturaldoc1

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:41:16 +0000

RE: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Don,

 

How hard was it to find an MD willing to work with you and did they accept your

theoretical concepts quickly?

 

Michael W. Bowser, DC, LAc

 

> Chinese Traditional Medicine

> don83407

> Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:07:11 -0600

> RE: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

>

> That's pretty much what I've been saying. I see what I do as needle-less

acupuncture but it is billed as physical medicine. The equipment I use has been

around since the late 70's and 80's, except for the SCENARs. The only difference

is the results that I get compared to those of PT's and MDs. That's the reason

for my patient load.

>

>

>

> Don SNow

>

>

>

> Chinese Medicine

> singlewhip2001

> Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:54:50 +0000

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

>

>

>

>

> Hi Don:

>

> Reading between the lines what you are saying is along with acupuncture you

use modalities that a western physician, nurse or therapist might use and its

billed under the MD so you can get the highest possible revenue because the

insurance company is viewing it as under the MD? Is this an accurate

understanding?

>

> thanks,

> david

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

<heylaurag wrote:

>

> We have a strong underground following that already knows us as " Traditional

" shortened to TCM or Chinese medicine. It makes no business

sense whatsoever to give that up. I have to say, our profession generally lacks

business sense, sadly.

>

> Laura

Acupuncture Today (jan 2010, vol 11 no 1) leads of with Will Morris' The Bright

Future Of Acupuncture wherein he tells us that Acupuncture gained recognition in

2009 and has a brand name that shines brightly in the media (at least in

2009)due mainly to a MLB pitcher and a tv danc-show contestent.

 

The article goes on to explain that Acupuncture will grow thru low price models

appealing to corporations and government, that community-style acupuncture will

grow and be supported by governments, that our traditional nomenclature (Liver

Qi stagnation with Spleen Qi deficiency) is archaic and must be replaced with

the language of occupational medicine, that we must develop specialties and

quickly evolve to the FPD.

 

Mr. Morris is the president of Autin, Tx's Academy of Oriental Medicine,

influential to other academics and to many future students. However, He is not

a private clinician, and I do not feel he at all represents those who are, and

his future is certainly not what I am interested in. His retoric is prime

example of what Laura points out: LACK OF BUSINESS SENSE.

 

The last thing I want is to look to the government for money to treat people.

Can anyone point me to a successful (U.S.) program where a)patients are thrilled

with the results of the care they receive and b) practitioners are happy with

the working environment (paperwork, etc.) and the compensation they receive

(think Veterens Administration)???????

 

Blend-in, be the low-price leader by any means, give the schools more

money...these are the steps to success???

 

I strongly doubt others on this list who are making excellent livings practicing

whatever form (by whatever name) of oriental medicine will agree that Will's

vision is their own.

 

I think the government should go back to having public hospitals (you remember

the County Hospital, don't you?) available for those who have no other health

care to turn to. As in the past, those who could make other arrangements

(private physician, private insurance, whatever) typically avoided the County

Hospital and chose their own provider.

 

We need less government, not more. We need people to take responsibility for

themselves, their families, and their choices.

 

Less than 3% of our Clinic's income came from insurance reimbursement of any

kind in 2009, and thats the way I like it. Clients pay cash, check,

visa/mastercard/discover for what they want: safe, effective, gentle treatments

with documented progress and true recovery without dangerous drugs (with myriad

" side " effects) and without unneccessary surgeries.

 

Mark Z

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

First the western medical professions take over our medicine, then the military,

and now here comes the FPD.  I think the future looks bleak for acupuncturists

(oops, TCM practitioners - but, by the way, no one where I live has any idea

what TCM is, aside from other LAc's), with or without the FPD.  We are not of

unified opinion on:

 

" medical " acupuncturists

the FPD

what to call ourselves

whether we should all be trained in herbal medicine in addition to acupuncture

(be TCM practitioners) or continue to have 2 separate categories of

acupuncturists - those who incorporate herbal medicine and those who don't... I

see this as a very big source of confusion for our public identity...

and other issues that affect our profession and threaten our livelihood

 

Plus, we are lacking a national standard for practice in all 50 of the United

States; indeed, there are some states which still lack an acupuncture statute,

and others require education only in acupuncture (and not also herbal medicine)

for licensure.  Still other states authorize only " doctors " to practice

acupuncture.   Those that do license acupuncturists, all have differing

educational and exam requirements.  How can we be unified on anything, if we are

not trained equally?

 

Even if we were unified in our opinion and strategies for addressing these

issues, we don't have the numbers of practitioners and deep pockets needed to

defend our profession properly.  Poor business sense compounds these problems.

 

If any of our brothers and sisters in other countries have addressed these

issues in ways that have been fruitful, I for one, would like to hear from

them.  What has been useful, and how is it working?

 

Thank you,

Andrea Beth

 

Traditional Oriental Medicine

Happy Hours in the CALM Center

635 S. 10th St.

Cottonwood, AZ  86326

(928) 274-1373

 

 

--- On Mon, 1/4/10, zedbowls <zaranski wrote:

 

zedbowls <zaranski

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

Chinese Medicine

Monday, January 4, 2010, 7:01 AM

 

<heylaurag wrote:

>

> We have a strong underground following that already knows us as " Traditional

" shortened to TCM or Chinese medicine.  It makes no business

sense whatsoever to give that up. I have to say, our profession generally lacks

business sense, sadly. 

>

> Laura

Acupuncture Today (jan 2010, vol 11 no 1) leads of with Will Morris' The Bright

Future Of Acupuncture wherein he tells us that Acupuncture gained recognition in

2009 and has a brand name that shines brightly in the media (at least in

2009)due mainly to a MLB pitcher and a tv danc-show contestent.

 

The article goes on to explain that Acupuncture will grow thru low price models

appealing to corporations and government, that community-style acupuncture will

grow and be supported by governments, that our traditional nomenclature (Liver

Qi stagnation with Spleen Qi deficiency) is archaic and must be replaced with

the language of occupational medicine, that we must develop specialties and

quickly evolve to the FPD.

 

Mr. Morris is the president of Autin, Tx's Academy of Oriental Medicine,

influential to other  academics and to many future students.  However, He is not

a private clinician, and I do not feel he at all represents those who are, and

his future is certainly not what I am interested in.  His retoric is prime

example of what Laura points out:  LACK OF BUSINESS SENSE.

 

The last thing I want is to look to the government for money to treat people. 

Can anyone point me to a successful (U.S.) program where a)patients are thrilled

with the results of the care they receive and b) practitioners are happy with

the working environment (paperwork, etc.) and the compensation they receive

(think Veterens Administration)???????

 

Blend-in, be the low-price leader by any means, give the schools more

money...these are the steps to success???

 

I strongly doubt others on this list who are making excellent livings practicing

whatever form (by whatever name) of oriental medicine will agree that Will's

vision is their own.

 

I think the government should go back to having public hospitals (you remember

the County Hospital, don't you?) available for those who have no other health

care to turn to.  As in the past, those who could make other arrangements

(private physician, private insurance, whatever) typically avoided the County

Hospital and chose their own provider.

 

We need less government, not more.  We need people to take responsibility for

themselves, their families, and their choices.

 

Less than 3% of our Clinic's income came from insurance reimbursement of any

kind in 2009, and thats the way I like it.  Clients pay cash, check,

visa/mastercard/discover for what they want:  safe, effective, gentle treatments

with documented progress and true recovery without dangerous drugs (with myriad

" side " effects) and without unneccessary surgeries.

 

Mark Z

 

 

 

---

 

Subscribe to the free online journal for TCM at Times

http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com

 

Help build the world's largest online encyclopedia for Chinese medicine and

acupuncture, click, http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com/wiki/CMTpedia

 

 

and adjust

accordingly.

 

 

 

Please consider the environment and only print this message if absolutely

necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Yeah, it would be very interesting to hear how other countries have dealt with

these issues. I think we cannot ignore the fact that as there are more and more

of us out there we will be shaping the future of our medicine. Whether it be

music our healthcare, over time the mainstream integrates underground movements

and makes them their own (think punk, hip hop, etc). Right now people are

grasping desperately to all the freedoms of being

underground/non-maintstream--eg: being able to not accept insurance, being able

to charge what they want to charge etc. But I do not think there is any way

around the reality that the mainstream is and will continue to be pulling us

into their fold, for better or worse.

 

We need to be making it for the better rather than for the worse. Pretending

that we can avoid it will not serve us. Because, for example, if you practice

in an area where most acupuncturists take insurance and there are a lot of

acupuncturists around it becomes very hard to make a living if you don't take

insurance. And eventually that is going to be teh case for most of the United

States. Yes, right now many practice in areas where they have little

competition and they have the freedom to write their own rules. That is

changing. And, this fact cannot be denied: a profession that requires a

doctorate to practice will be paid more than a profession that does not. Those

of us who are already practicing will be grandfathered in--we won't have to go

back and get the doctorate to practice. But if our medicine is developed with a

doctorate level degree we will all benefit.

 

Doesn't anyone else get tired of practicing a medicine with all the

responsibilities of being a doctor but being treated like we are massage

therapists? (no offense to massage therapists)

 

Laura

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine ,

< wrote:

>

> First the western medical professions take over our medicine, then the

military, and now here comes the FPD.  I think the future looks bleak for

acupuncturists (oops, TCM practitioners - but, by the way, no one where I live

has any idea what TCM is, aside from other LAc's), with or without the FPD.  We

are not of unified opinion on:

>

> " medical " acupuncturists

> the FPD

> what to call ourselves

> whether we should all be trained in herbal medicine in addition to acupuncture

(be TCM practitioners) or continue to have 2 separate categories of

acupuncturists - those who incorporate herbal medicine and those who don't... I

see this as a very big source of confusion for our public identity...

> and other issues that affect our profession and threaten our livelihood

>

> Plus, we are lacking a national standard for practice in all 50 of the United

States; indeed, there are some states which still lack an acupuncture statute,

and others require education only in acupuncture (and not also herbal medicine)

for licensure.  Still other states authorize only " doctors " to practice

acupuncture.   Those that do license acupuncturists, all have differing

educational and exam requirements.  How can we be unified on anything, if we are

not trained equally?

>

> Even if we were unified in our opinion and strategies for addressing these

issues, we don't have the numbers of practitioners and deep pockets needed to

defend our profession properly.  Poor business sense compounds these problems.

>

> If any of our brothers and sisters in other countries have addressed these

issues in ways that have been fruitful, I for one, would like to hear from

them.  What has been useful, and how is it working?

>

> Thank you,

> Andrea Beth

>

> Traditional Oriental Medicine

> Happy Hours in the CALM Center

> 635 S. 10th St.

> Cottonwood, AZ  86326

> (928) 274-1373

>

>

> --- On Mon, 1/4/10, zedbowls <zaranski wrote:

>

> zedbowls <zaranski

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

> Chinese Medicine

> Monday, January 4, 2010, 7:01 AM

>

> <heylaurag@> wrote:

> >

> > We have a strong underground following that already knows us as " Traditional

" shortened to TCM or Chinese medicine.  It makes no business

sense whatsoever to give that up. I have to say, our profession generally lacks

business sense, sadly. 

> >

> > Laura

> Acupuncture Today (jan 2010, vol 11 no 1) leads of with Will Morris' The

Bright Future Of Acupuncture wherein he tells us that Acupuncture gained

recognition in 2009 and has a brand name that shines brightly in the media (at

least in 2009)due mainly to a MLB pitcher and a tv danc-show contestent.

>

> The article goes on to explain that Acupuncture will grow thru low price

models appealing to corporations and government, that community-style

acupuncture will grow and be supported by governments, that our traditional

nomenclature (Liver Qi stagnation with Spleen Qi deficiency) is archaic and must

be replaced with the language of occupational medicine, that we must develop

specialties and quickly evolve to the FPD.

>

> Mr. Morris is the president of Autin, Tx's Academy of Oriental Medicine,

influential to other  academics and to many future students.  However, He is not

a private clinician, and I do not feel he at all represents those who are, and

his future is certainly not what I am interested in.  His retoric is prime

example of what Laura points out:  LACK OF BUSINESS SENSE.

>

> The last thing I want is to look to the government for money to treat people. 

Can anyone point me to a successful (U.S.) program where a)patients are thrilled

with the results of the care they receive and b) practitioners are happy with

the working environment (paperwork, etc.) and the compensation they receive

(think Veterens Administration)???????

>

> Blend-in, be the low-price leader by any means, give the schools more

money...these are the steps to success???

>

> I strongly doubt others on this list who are making excellent livings

practicing whatever form (by whatever name) of oriental medicine will agree that

Will's vision is their own.

>

> I think the government should go back to having public hospitals (you remember

the County Hospital, don't you?) available for those who have no other health

care to turn to.  As in the past, those who could make other arrangements

(private physician, private insurance, whatever) typically avoided the County

Hospital and chose their own provider.

>

> We need less government, not more.  We need people to take responsibility for

themselves, their families, and their choices.

>

> Less than 3% of our Clinic's income came from insurance reimbursement of any

kind in 2009, and thats the way I like it.  Clients pay cash, check,

visa/mastercard/discover for what they want:  safe, effective, gentle treatments

with documented progress and true recovery without dangerous drugs (with myriad

" side " effects) and without unneccessary surgeries.

>

> Mark Z

>

>

>

> ---

>

> Subscribe to the free online journal for TCM at Times

http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com

>

> Help build the world's largest online encyclopedia for Chinese medicine and

acupuncture, click, http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com/wiki/CMTpedia

>

>

and adjust

accordingly.

>

>

>

> Please consider the environment and only print this message if absolutely

necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Andrea Beth and all:

 

--Andrea Beth-

 

We are not of unified opinion on:

" medical " acupuncturists

the FPD

what to call ourselves

whether we should all be trained in herbal medicine in addition to

acupuncture (be TCM practitioners) or continue to have 2 separate

categories of acupuncturists - those who incorporate herbal medicine

and those who don't... I see this as a very big source of confusion for

our public identity...

and other issues that affect our profession and threaten our livelihood

---

 

From my p.o.v. all of the above boil down to one thing, and one thing only, and

it is the thing we must answer *first*:

 

Do we, as individuals, buy into CM, or do we buy into WM?

 

Do we actually believe there is a real thing " parkinson's " ? Do we feel confused

when we think " damp " ?

Do we actually buy that " erythema multiformis " is a specialist term originating

from a super-advanced technological medicine...or do we *clearly* understand

that erythema multiformis is a " common language " description from a language so

archaic it's DEAD and meaning no more than (literally) " red skin many shapes " .

 

And yet we have the goof in Austin saying that we have to give up our " archaic "

language because...there's another *more* archaic language that we'd rather

use?!

 

Let's look at a few WM diagnoses:

 

Schizophrenia - Split Diaphragm / Split Mind (same Phren from phrenology by the

way)

Diabetes - " To pass through " . Diarrhea? No, Dia/betes/. Just trying to be

specific.

Angina Pectoris - Strangulation in the chest

Idiopathic Neuralgia - Something hurts and we don't know how or why (literally).

But we have a name. Ok, ok, let's give that one another shot:

Idiopathic Neuralgia - Comes-from-private-suffering Vigor-Sinew pain.

Lupus Erythematosus - Wolf Red Sea-Mullet on the skin (that is *spooky*, people,

*spooky*)

 

I hope I amuse you guys.

 

So just to tie this one up: what we might want to look at as a profession is a

course called " yin yang theory " , and if you don't get it, you don't get it (the

degree / certification). I really feel that if we did that, a lot of our

problems would vanish. How to defeat your enemy? Divide their attention, cause

them to doubt themselves. Our attention is being divided very effectively, from

my p.o.v.

 

Happy 2010 everyone!

Hugo

 

 

 

________________________________

Hugo Ramiro

http://middlemedicine.wordpress.com

http://www.middlemedicine.org

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

<

Chinese Medicine

Mon, 4 January, 2010 11:05:34

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

 

 

First the western medical professions take over our medicine, then the military,

and now here comes the FPD. I think the future looks bleak for acupuncturists

(oops, TCM practitioners - but, by the way, no one where I live has any idea

what TCM is, aside from other LAc's), with or without the FPD.

 

Plus, we are lacking a national standard for practice in all 50 of the United

States; indeed, there are some states which still lack an acupuncture statute,

and others require education only in acupuncture (and not also herbal medicine)

for licensure. Still other states authorize only " doctors " to practice

acupuncture. Those that do license acupuncturists, all have differing

educational and exam requirements. How can we be unified on anything, if we are

not trained equally?

 

Even if we were unified in our opinion and strategies for addressing these

issues, we don't have the numbers of practitioners and deep pockets needed to

defend our profession properly. Poor business sense compounds these problems.

 

If any of our brothers and sisters in other countries have addressed these

issues in ways that have been fruitful, I for one, would like to hear from them.

What has been useful, and how is it working?

 

Thank you,

Andrea Beth

 

Traditional Oriental Medicine

Happy Hours in the CALM Center

635 S. 10th St.

Cottonwood, AZ 86326

(928) 274-1373

 

--- On Mon, 1/4/10, zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:

 

zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net>

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

 

Monday, January 4, 2010, 7:01 AM

 

<heylaurag@. ..> wrote:

>

> We have a strong underground following that already knows us as " Traditional

" shortened to TCM or Chinese medicine. It makes no business

sense whatsoever to give that up. I have to say, our profession generally lacks

business sense, sadly.

>

> Laura

Acupuncture Today (jan 2010, vol 11 no 1) leads of with Will Morris' The Bright

Future Of Acupuncture wherein he tells us that Acupuncture gained recognition in

2009 and has a brand name that shines brightly in the media (at least in

2009)due mainly to a MLB pitcher and a tv danc-show contestent.

 

The article goes on to explain that Acupuncture will grow thru low price models

appealing to corporations and government, that community-style acupuncture will

grow and be supported by governments, that our traditional nomenclature (Liver

Qi stagnation with Spleen Qi deficiency) is archaic and must be replaced with

the language of occupational medicine, that we must develop specialties and

quickly evolve to the FPD.

 

Mr. Morris is the president of Autin, Tx's Academy of Oriental Medicine,

influential to other academics and to many future students. However, He is not

a private clinician, and I do not feel he at all represents those who are, and

his future is certainly not what I am interested in. His retoric is prime

example of what Laura points out: LACK OF BUSINESS SENSE.

 

The last thing I want is to look to the government for money to treat people.

Can anyone point me to a successful (U.S.) program where a)patients are thrilled

with the results of the care they receive and b) practitioners are happy with

the working environment (paperwork, etc.) and the compensation they receive

(think Veterens Administration) ???????

 

Blend-in, be the low-price leader by any means, give the schools more

money...these are the steps to success???

 

I strongly doubt others on this list who are making excellent livings practicing

whatever form (by whatever name) of oriental medicine will agree that Will's

vision is their own.

 

I think the government should go back to having public hospitals (you remember

the County Hospital, don't you?) available for those who have no other health

care to turn to. As in the past, those who could make other arrangements

(private physician, private insurance, whatever) typically avoided the County

Hospital and chose their own provider.

 

We need less government, not more. We need people to take responsibility for

themselves, their families, and their choices.

 

Less than 3% of our Clinic's income came from insurance reimbursement of any

kind in 2009, and thats the way I like it. Clients pay cash, check,

visa/mastercard/ discover for what they want: safe, effective, gentle

treatments with documented progress and true recovery without dangerous drugs

(with myriad " side " effects) and without unneccessary surgeries.

 

Mark Z

 

------------ --------- --------- ------

 

Subscribe to the free online journal for TCM at Times

http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com

 

Help build the world's largest online encyclopedia for Chinese medicine and

acupuncture, click, http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com/wiki/ CMTpedia

 

http://groups. /

group/Traditiona l_Chinese_ Medicine/ join and adjust accordingly.

 

 

 

Please consider the environment and only print this message if absolutely

necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Thank you, Hugo - I agree with your point of view, and I am completely amused by

your terminology references.

 

I don't believe, however, that studying yin-yang theory is sufficient as a

solution for all that ails us as a profession.  But yes, we should be proficient

in it.

 

Andrea Beth

 

Traditional Oriental Medicine

Happy Hours in the CALM Center

635 S. 10th St.

Cottonwood, AZ  86326

(928) 274-1373

 

 

--- On Mon, 1/4/10, Hugo Ramiro <subincor wrote:

 

Hugo Ramiro <subincor

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

Chinese Medicine

Monday, January 4, 2010, 2:01 PM

 

Hi Andrea Beth and all:

 

--Andrea Beth-

 

We are not of unified opinion on:

" medical " acupuncturists

the FPD

what to call ourselves

whether we should all be trained in herbal medicine in addition to

acupuncture (be TCM practitioners) or continue to have 2 separate

categories of acupuncturists - those who incorporate herbal medicine

and those who don't... I see this as a very big source of confusion for

our public identity...

and other issues that affect our profession and threaten our livelihood

---

 

From my p.o.v. all of the above boil down to one thing, and one thing only, and

it is the thing we must answer *first*:

 

Do we, as individuals, buy into CM, or do we buy into WM?

 

Do we actually believe there is a real thing " parkinson's " ? Do we feel confused

when we think " damp " ?

Do we actually buy that " erythema multiformis " is a specialist term originating

from a super-advanced technological medicine...or do we *clearly* understand

that erythema multiformis is a " common language " description from a language so

archaic it's DEAD and meaning no more than (literally) " red skin many shapes " .

 

And yet we have the goof in Austin saying that we have to give up our " archaic "

language because...there's another *more* archaic language that we'd rather

use?!

 

Let's look at a few WM diagnoses:

 

Schizophrenia - Split Diaphragm / Split Mind (same Phren from phrenology by the

way)

Diabetes - " To pass through " . Diarrhea? No, Dia/betes/. Just trying to be

specific.

Angina Pectoris - Strangulation in the chest

Idiopathic Neuralgia - Something hurts and we don't know how or why (literally).

But we have a name. Ok, ok, let's give that one another shot:

Idiopathic Neuralgia - Comes-from-private-suffering Vigor-Sinew pain.

Lupus Erythematosus - Wolf Red Sea-Mullet on the skin (that is *spooky*, people,

*spooky*)

 

I hope I amuse you guys.

 

So just to tie this one up: what we might want to look at as a profession is a

course called " yin yang theory " , and if you don't get it, you don't get it (the

degree / certification). I really feel that if we did that, a lot of our

problems would vanish. How to defeat your enemy? Divide their attention, cause

them to doubt themselves. Our attention is being divided very effectively, from

my p.o.v.

 

Happy 2010 everyone!

Hugo

 

 

 

________________________________

Hugo Ramiro

http://middlemedicine.wordpress.com

http://www.middlemedicine.org

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

<

Chinese Medicine

Mon, 4 January, 2010 11:05:34

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

 

 

First the western medical professions take over our medicine, then the military,

and now here comes the FPD.  I think the future looks bleak for acupuncturists

(oops, TCM practitioners - but, by the way, no one where I live has any idea

what TCM is, aside from other LAc's), with or without the FPD. 

 

Plus, we are lacking a national standard for practice in all 50 of the United

States; indeed, there are some states which still lack an acupuncture statute,

and others require education only in acupuncture (and not also herbal medicine)

for licensure.  Still other states authorize only " doctors " to practice

acupuncture.   Those that do license acupuncturists, all have differing

educational and exam requirements.  How can we be unified on anything, if we are

not trained equally?

 

Even if we were unified in our opinion and strategies for addressing these

issues, we don't have the numbers of practitioners and deep pockets needed to

defend our profession properly.  Poor business sense compounds these problems.

 

If any of our brothers and sisters in other countries have addressed these

issues in ways that have been fruitful, I for one, would like to hear from

them.  What has been useful, and how is it working?

 

Thank you,

Andrea Beth

 

Traditional Oriental Medicine

Happy Hours in the CALM Center

635 S. 10th St.

Cottonwood, AZ  86326

(928) 274-1373

 

--- On Mon, 1/4/10, zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:

 

zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net>

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

 

Monday, January 4, 2010, 7:01 AM

 

<heylaurag@. ..> wrote:

>

> We have a strong underground following that already knows us as " Traditional

" shortened to TCM or Chinese medicine.  It makes no business

sense whatsoever to give that up. I have to say, our profession generally lacks

business sense, sadly. 

>

> Laura

Acupuncture Today (jan 2010, vol 11 no 1) leads of with Will Morris' The Bright

Future Of Acupuncture wherein he tells us that Acupuncture gained recognition in

2009 and has a brand name that shines brightly in the media (at least in

2009)due mainly to a MLB pitcher and a tv danc-show contestent.

 

The article goes on to explain that Acupuncture will grow thru low price models

appealing to corporations and government, that community-style acupuncture will

grow and be supported by governments, that our traditional nomenclature (Liver

Qi stagnation with Spleen Qi deficiency) is archaic and must be replaced with

the language of occupational medicine, that we must develop specialties and

quickly evolve to the FPD.

 

Mr. Morris is the president of Autin, Tx's Academy of Oriental Medicine,

influential to other  academics and to many future students.  However, He is not

a private clinician, and I do not feel he at all represents those who are, and

his future is certainly not what I am interested in.  His retoric is prime

example of what Laura points out:  LACK OF BUSINESS SENSE.

 

The last thing I want is to look to the government for money to treat people. 

Can anyone point me to a successful (U.S.) program where a)patients are thrilled

with the results of the care they receive and b) practitioners are happy with

the working environment (paperwork, etc.) and the compensation they receive

(think Veterens Administration) ???????

 

Blend-in, be the low-price leader by any means, give the schools more

money...these are the steps to success???

 

I strongly doubt others on this list who are making excellent livings practicing

whatever form (by whatever name) of oriental medicine will agree that Will's

vision is their own.

 

I think the government should go back to having public hospitals (you remember

the County Hospital, don't you?) available for those who have no other health

care to turn to.  As in the past, those who could make other arrangements

(private physician, private insurance, whatever) typically avoided the County

Hospital and chose their own provider.

 

We need less government, not more.  We need people to take responsibility for

themselves, their families, and their choices.

 

Less than 3% of our Clinic's income came from insurance reimbursement of any

kind in 2009, and thats the way I like it.  Clients pay cash, check,

visa/mastercard/ discover for what they want:  safe, effective, gentle

treatments with documented progress and true recovery without dangerous drugs

(with myriad " side " effects) and without unneccessary surgeries.

 

Mark Z

 

------------ --------- --------- ------

 

Subscribe to the free online journal for TCM at Times

http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com

 

Help build the world's largest online encyclopedia for Chinese medicine and

acupuncture, click, http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com/wiki/ CMTpedia

 

http://groups. /

group/Traditiona l_Chinese_ Medicine/ join and adjust accordingly.

 

 

 

Please consider the environment and only print this message if absolutely

necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hugo,

I haven't read the article yet, but I'd be pretty surprised if Will was

recommending giving up the language of Chinese medicine, knowing how dedicated

he is to the classical medicine, especially pulse diagnosis.

 

Having said that, I think you've hit the issue right on the head. If we

innately feel that biomedicine is the only 'true' reality in medicine, and that

what Chinese medicine describes is a fiction, then the profession will fade away

eventually and only the needles will survive, not the theory, the herbs, or the

moxa.

 

 

On Jan 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Hugo Ramiro wrote:

 

> Hi Andrea Beth and all:

>

> --Andrea Beth-

>

> We are not of unified opinion on:

> " medical " acupuncturists

> the FPD

> what to call ourselves

> whether we should all be trained in herbal medicine in addition to

> acupuncture (be TCM practitioners) or continue to have 2 separate

> categories of acupuncturists - those who incorporate herbal medicine

> and those who don't... I see this as a very big source of confusion for

> our public identity...

> and other issues that affect our profession and threaten our livelihood

> ---

>

> From my p.o.v. all of the above boil down to one thing, and one thing only,

and it is the thing we must answer *first*:

>

> Do we, as individuals, buy into CM, or do we buy into WM?

>

> Do we actually believe there is a real thing " parkinson's " ? Do we feel

confused when we think " damp " ?

> Do we actually buy that " erythema multiformis " is a specialist term

originating from a super-advanced technological medicine...or do we *clearly*

understand that erythema multiformis is a " common language " description from a

language so archaic it's DEAD and meaning no more than (literally) " red skin

many shapes " .

>

> And yet we have the goof in Austin saying that we have to give up our

" archaic " language because...there's another *more* archaic language that we'd

rather use?!

>

> Let's look at a few WM diagnoses:

>

> Schizophrenia - Split Diaphragm / Split Mind (same Phren from phrenology by

the way)

> Diabetes - " To pass through " . Diarrhea? No, Dia/betes/. Just trying to be

specific.

> Angina Pectoris - Strangulation in the chest

> Idiopathic Neuralgia - Something hurts and we don't know how or why

(literally). But we have a name. Ok, ok, let's give that one another shot:

> Idiopathic Neuralgia - Comes-from-private-suffering Vigor-Sinew pain.

> Lupus Erythematosus - Wolf Red Sea-Mullet on the skin (that is *spooky*,

people, *spooky*)

>

> I hope I amuse you guys.

>

> So just to tie this one up: what we might want to look at as a profession is a

course called " yin yang theory " , and if you don't get it, you don't get it (the

degree / certification). I really feel that if we did that, a lot of our

problems would vanish. How to defeat your enemy? Divide their attention, cause

them to doubt themselves. Our attention is being divided very effectively, from

my p.o.v.

>

> Happy 2010 everyone!

> Hugo

>

> ________________________________

> Hugo Ramiro

> http://middlemedicine.wordpress.com

> http://www.middlemedicine.org

>

> ________________________________

> <

> Chinese Medicine

> Mon, 4 January, 2010 11:05:34

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

> First the western medical professions take over our medicine, then the

military, and now here comes the FPD. I think the future looks bleak for

acupuncturists (oops, TCM practitioners - but, by the way, no one where I live

has any idea what TCM is, aside from other LAc's), with or without the FPD.

>

> Plus, we are lacking a national standard for practice in all 50 of the United

States; indeed, there are some states which still lack an acupuncture statute,

and others require education only in acupuncture (and not also herbal medicine)

for licensure. Still other states authorize only " doctors " to practice

acupuncture. Those that do license acupuncturists, all have differing

educational and exam requirements. How can we be unified on anything, if we are

not trained equally?

>

> Even if we were unified in our opinion and strategies for addressing these

issues, we don't have the numbers of practitioners and deep pockets needed to

defend our profession properly. Poor business sense compounds these problems.

>

> If any of our brothers and sisters in other countries have addressed these

issues in ways that have been fruitful, I for one, would like to hear from them.

What has been useful, and how is it working?

>

> Thank you,

> Andrea Beth

>

> Traditional Oriental Medicine

> Happy Hours in the CALM Center

> 635 S. 10th St.

> Cottonwood, AZ 86326

> (928) 274-1373

>

> --- On Mon, 1/4/10, zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:

>

> zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net>

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

> Monday, January 4, 2010, 7:01 AM

>

> <heylaurag@. ..> wrote:

> >

> > We have a strong underground following that already knows us as " Traditional

" shortened to TCM or Chinese medicine. It makes no business

sense whatsoever to give that up. I have to say, our profession generally lacks

business sense, sadly.

> >

> > Laura

> Acupuncture Today (jan 2010, vol 11 no 1) leads of with Will Morris' The

Bright Future Of Acupuncture wherein he tells us that Acupuncture gained

recognition in 2009 and has a brand name that shines brightly in the media (at

least in 2009)due mainly to a MLB pitcher and a tv danc-show contestent.

>

> The article goes on to explain that Acupuncture will grow thru low price

models appealing to corporations and government, that community-style

acupuncture will grow and be supported by governments, that our traditional

nomenclature (Liver Qi stagnation with Spleen Qi deficiency) is archaic and must

be replaced with the language of occupational medicine, that we must develop

specialties and quickly evolve to the FPD.

>

> Mr. Morris is the president of Autin, Tx's Academy of Oriental Medicine,

influential to other academics and to many future students. However, He is not a

private clinician, and I do not feel he at all represents those who are, and his

future is certainly not what I am interested in. His retoric is prime example of

what Laura points out: LACK OF BUSINESS SENSE.

>

> The last thing I want is to look to the government for money to treat people.

Can anyone point me to a successful (U.S.) program where a)patients are thrilled

with the results of the care they receive and b) practitioners are happy with

the working environment (paperwork, etc.) and the compensation they receive

(think Veterens Administration) ???????

>

> Blend-in, be the low-price leader by any means, give the schools more

money...these are the steps to success???

>

> I strongly doubt others on this list who are making excellent livings

practicing whatever form (by whatever name) of oriental medicine will agree that

Will's vision is their own.

>

> I think the government should go back to having public hospitals (you remember

the County Hospital, don't you?) available for those who have no other health

care to turn to. As in the past, those who could make other arrangements

(private physician, private insurance, whatever) typically avoided the County

Hospital and chose their own provider.

>

> We need less government, not more. We need people to take responsibility for

themselves, their families, and their choices.

>

> Less than 3% of our Clinic's income came from insurance reimbursement of any

kind in 2009, and thats the way I like it. Clients pay cash, check,

visa/mastercard/ discover for what they want: safe, effective, gentle treatments

with documented progress and true recovery without dangerous drugs (with myriad

" side " effects) and without unneccessary surgeries.

>

> Mark Z

>

> ------------ --------- --------- ------

>

> Subscribe to the free online journal for TCM at Times

http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com

>

> Help build the world's largest online encyclopedia for Chinese medicine and

acupuncture, click, http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com/wiki/ CMTpedia

>

> http://groups. /

group/Traditiona l_Chinese_ Medicine/ join and adjust accordingly.

>

>

>

> Please consider the environment and only print this message if absolutely

necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Hugo, yeah, I agree with you completely. It cracks me up how satisfied

people will be when they are given a fancy diagnosis for something that is realy

just a decorated way of saying what they already know--that they have a skin

rash and it is red.

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine , Hugo Ramiro <subincor

wrote:

>

> Hi Andrea Beth and all:

>

> --Andrea Beth-

>

> We are not of unified opinion on:

> " medical " acupuncturists

> the FPD

> what to call ourselves

> whether we should all be trained in herbal medicine in addition to

> acupuncture (be TCM practitioners) or continue to have 2 separate

> categories of acupuncturists - those who incorporate herbal medicine

> and those who don't... I see this as a very big source of confusion for

> our public identity...

> and other issues that affect our profession and threaten our livelihood

> ---

>

> From my p.o.v. all of the above boil down to one thing, and one thing only,

and it is the thing we must answer *first*:

>

> Do we, as individuals, buy into CM, or do we buy into WM?

>

> Do we actually believe there is a real thing " parkinson's " ? Do we feel

confused when we think " damp " ?

> Do we actually buy that " erythema multiformis " is a specialist term

originating from a super-advanced technological medicine...or do we *clearly*

understand that erythema multiformis is a " common language " description from a

language so archaic it's DEAD and meaning no more than (literally) " red skin

many shapes " .

>

> And yet we have the goof in Austin saying that we have to give up our

" archaic " language because...there's another *more* archaic language that we'd

rather use?!

>

> Let's look at a few WM diagnoses:

>

> Schizophrenia - Split Diaphragm / Split Mind (same Phren from phrenology by

the way)

> Diabetes - " To pass through " . Diarrhea? No, Dia/betes/. Just trying to be

specific.

> Angina Pectoris - Strangulation in the chest

> Idiopathic Neuralgia - Something hurts and we don't know how or why

(literally). But we have a name. Ok, ok, let's give that one another shot:

> Idiopathic Neuralgia - Comes-from-private-suffering Vigor-Sinew pain.

> Lupus Erythematosus - Wolf Red Sea-Mullet on the skin (that is *spooky*,

people, *spooky*)

>

> I hope I amuse you guys.

>

> So just to tie this one up: what we might want to look at as a profession is

a course called " yin yang theory " , and if you don't get it, you don't get it

(the degree / certification). I really feel that if we did that, a lot of our

problems would vanish. How to defeat your enemy? Divide their attention, cause

them to doubt themselves. Our attention is being divided very effectively, from

my p.o.v.

>

> Happy 2010 everyone!

> Hugo

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> Hugo Ramiro

> http://middlemedicine.wordpress.com

> http://www.middlemedicine.org

>

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> <

> Chinese Medicine

> Mon, 4 January, 2010 11:05:34

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

>

> First the western medical professions take over our medicine, then the

military, and now here comes the FPD. I think the future looks bleak for

acupuncturists (oops, TCM practitioners - but, by the way, no one where I live

has any idea what TCM is, aside from other LAc's), with or without the FPD.

>

> Plus, we are lacking a national standard for practice in all 50 of the United

States; indeed, there are some states which still lack an acupuncture statute,

and others require education only in acupuncture (and not also herbal medicine)

for licensure. Still other states authorize only " doctors " to practice

acupuncture. Those that do license acupuncturists, all have differing

educational and exam requirements. How can we be unified on anything, if we are

not trained equally?

>

> Even if we were unified in our opinion and strategies for addressing these

issues, we don't have the numbers of practitioners and deep pockets needed to

defend our profession properly. Poor business sense compounds these problems.

>

> If any of our brothers and sisters in other countries have addressed these

issues in ways that have been fruitful, I for one, would like to hear from them.

What has been useful, and how is it working?

>

> Thank you,

> Andrea Beth

>

> Traditional Oriental Medicine

> Happy Hours in the CALM Center

> 635 S. 10th St.

> Cottonwood, AZ 86326

> (928) 274-1373

>

> --- On Mon, 1/4/10, zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:

>

> zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net>

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

> Monday, January 4, 2010, 7:01 AM

>

> <heylaurag@ ..> wrote:

> >

> > We have a strong underground following that already knows us as " Traditional

" shortened to TCM or Chinese medicine. It makes no business

sense whatsoever to give that up. I have to say, our profession generally lacks

business sense, sadly.

> >

> > Laura

> Acupuncture Today (jan 2010, vol 11 no 1) leads of with Will Morris' The

Bright Future Of Acupuncture wherein he tells us that Acupuncture gained

recognition in 2009 and has a brand name that shines brightly in the media (at

least in 2009)due mainly to a MLB pitcher and a tv danc-show contestent.

>

> The article goes on to explain that Acupuncture will grow thru low price

models appealing to corporations and government, that community-style

acupuncture will grow and be supported by governments, that our traditional

nomenclature (Liver Qi stagnation with Spleen Qi deficiency) is archaic and must

be replaced with the language of occupational medicine, that we must develop

specialties and quickly evolve to the FPD.

>

> Mr. Morris is the president of Autin, Tx's Academy of Oriental Medicine,

influential to other academics and to many future students. However, He is not

a private clinician, and I do not feel he at all represents those who are, and

his future is certainly not what I am interested in. His retoric is prime

example of what Laura points out: LACK OF BUSINESS SENSE.

>

> The last thing I want is to look to the government for money to treat people.

Can anyone point me to a successful (U.S.) program where a)patients are thrilled

with the results of the care they receive and b) practitioners are happy with

the working environment (paperwork, etc.) and the compensation they receive

(think Veterens Administration) ???????

>

> Blend-in, be the low-price leader by any means, give the schools more

money...these are the steps to success???

>

> I strongly doubt others on this list who are making excellent livings

practicing whatever form (by whatever name) of oriental medicine will agree that

Will's vision is their own.

>

> I think the government should go back to having public hospitals (you remember

the County Hospital, don't you?) available for those who have no other health

care to turn to. As in the past, those who could make other arrangements

(private physician, private insurance, whatever) typically avoided the County

Hospital and chose their own provider.

>

> We need less government, not more. We need people to take responsibility for

themselves, their families, and their choices.

>

> Less than 3% of our Clinic's income came from insurance reimbursement of any

kind in 2009, and thats the way I like it. Clients pay cash, check,

visa/mastercard/ discover for what they want: safe, effective, gentle

treatments with documented progress and true recovery without dangerous drugs

(with myriad " side " effects) and without unneccessary surgeries.

>

> Mark Z

>

> ------------ --------- --------- ------

>

> Subscribe to the free online journal for TCM at Times

http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com

>

> Help build the world's largest online encyclopedia for Chinese medicine and

acupuncture, click, http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com/wiki/ CMTpedia

>

> http://groups. /

group/Traditiona l_Chinese_ Medicine/ join and adjust accordingly.

>

>

>

> Please consider the environment and only print this message if absolutely

necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Z'ev, yes it seems I very much spoke out of turn, although I don't agree

with Will Morris exactly. I fully retract my initial judgement of calling him a

goof. Totally inappropriate. Here's the relevant piece of the article which I

just read:

 

--William Morris / Acupuncture Today-

Participating acupuncturists must adapt appropriate physical

assessment, outcomes measures and report-writing to the culture of

occupational medicine. Liver qi stagnation and the five

elements, while important as an in-discipline model of thought, will

not work in that environment. We must give up the idea that others will

accept our nomenclature. It is ours and we need it, but they don't. We

must therefore communicate in a way that our listeners can hear.

---

 

To communicate in a way that my listeners can hear is very important, but to

eliminate myself from the picture is impossible. In other words, if what I am

*truly* doing is treating Liver Qi stagnation, then, somehow, that fact will

express itself, and likely, it will permeate who I am and what I do, even when I

am co-opting western medical terminology and differentials for my purposes.

 

To pretend that corporations (for example) will not " cave " to our concepts is

to ignore that they have caved in every instance where the circumstances or the

consumers have demanded that they do so. If it is our concepts which allow us to

provide a sustainable medicine, then it is unavoidable that people of all walks

of life accept our terms. Our terms, after all, are based on repeated, tested,

observations.

 

We must also remember that the people who approach us, be they patients,

representatives of biomedicine and so on, approach us in part *because* of our

terminology. People are tired of the machine metaphor. The machine metaphor will

kill us - it is *that* which must be given up.

 

On a practical note, it is perfectly possible in my point of view to retain

both terminologies and differentials, one for communication, and the other for

the real work. Just so long as that is the hierarchy that is present.

 

Thanks,

Hugo

 

 

________________________________

Hugo Ramiro

http://middlemedicine.wordpress.com

http://www.middlemedicine.org

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

<zrosenbe

Chinese Medicine

Mon, 4 January, 2010 17:43:50

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

 

Hugo,

I haven't read the article yet, but I'd be pretty surprised if Will was

recommending giving up the language of Chinese medicine, knowing how dedicated

he is to the classical medicine, especially pulse diagnosis.

 

Having said that, I think you've hit the issue right on the head. If we

innately feel that biomedicine is the only 'true' reality in medicine, and that

what Chinese medicine describes is a fiction, then the profession will fade away

eventually and only the needles will survive, not the theory, the herbs, or the

moxa.

 

 

On Jan 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Hugo Ramiro wrote:

 

> Hi Andrea Beth and all:

>

> --Andrea Beth-

>

> We are not of unified opinion on:

> " medical " acupuncturists

> the FPD

> what to call ourselves

> whether we should all be trained in herbal medicine in addition to

> acupuncture (be TCM practitioners) or continue to have 2 separate

> categories of acupuncturists - those who incorporate herbal medicine

> and those who don't... I see this as a very big source of confusion for

> our public identity...

> and other issues that affect our profession and threaten our livelihood

> ---

>

> From my p.o.v. all of the above boil down to one thing, and one thing only,

and it is the thing we must answer *first*:

>

> Do we, as individuals, buy into CM, or do we buy into WM?

>

> Do we actually believe there is a real thing " parkinson's " ? Do we feel

confused when we think " damp " ?

> Do we actually buy that " erythema multiformis " is a specialist term

originating from a super-advanced technological medicine...or do we *clearly*

understand that erythema multiformis is a " common language " description from a

language so archaic it's DEAD and meaning no more than (literally) " red skin

many shapes " .

>

> And yet we have the goof in Austin saying that we have to give up our

" archaic " language because...there's another *more* archaic language that we'd

rather use?!

>

> Let's look at a few WM diagnoses:

>

> Schizophrenia - Split Diaphragm / Split Mind (same Phren from phrenology by

the way)

> Diabetes - " To pass through " . Diarrhea? No, Dia/betes/. Just trying to be

specific.

> Angina Pectoris - Strangulation in the chest

> Idiopathic Neuralgia - Something hurts and we don't know how or why

(literally). But we have a name. Ok, ok, let's give that one another shot:

> Idiopathic Neuralgia - Comes-from-private-suffering Vigor-Sinew pain.

> Lupus Erythematosus - Wolf Red Sea-Mullet on the skin (that is *spooky*,

people, *spooky*)

>

> I hope I amuse you guys.

>

> So just to tie this one up: what we might want to look at as a profession is a

course called " yin yang theory " , and if you don't get it, you don't get it (the

degree / certification). I really feel that if we did that, a lot of our

problems would vanish. How to defeat your enemy? Divide their attention, cause

them to doubt themselves. Our attention is being divided very effectively, from

my p.o.v.

>

> Happy 2010 everyone!

> Hugo

>

> ________________________________

> Hugo Ramiro

> http://middlemedicine.wordpress.com

> http://www.middlemedicine.org

>

> ________________________________

> <

> Chinese Medicine

> Mon, 4 January, 2010 11:05:34

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

> First the western medical professions take over our medicine, then the

military, and now here comes the FPD. I think the future looks bleak for

acupuncturists (oops, TCM practitioners - but, by the way, no one where I live

has any idea what TCM is, aside from other LAc's), with or without the FPD.

>

> Plus, we are lacking a national standard for practice in all 50 of the United

States; indeed, there are some states which still lack an acupuncture statute,

and others require education only in acupuncture (and not also herbal medicine)

for licensure. Still other states authorize only " doctors " to practice

acupuncture. Those that do license acupuncturists, all have differing

educational and exam requirements. How can we be unified on anything, if we are

not trained equally?

>

> Even if we were unified in our opinion and strategies for addressing these

issues, we don't have the numbers of practitioners and deep pockets needed to

defend our profession properly. Poor business sense compounds these problems.

>

> If any of our brothers and sisters in other countries have addressed these

issues in ways that have been fruitful, I for one, would like to hear from them.

What has been useful, and how is it working?

>

> Thank you,

> Andrea Beth

>

> Traditional Oriental Medicine

> Happy Hours in the CALM Center

> 635 S. 10th St.

> Cottonwood, AZ 86326

> (928) 274-1373

>

> --- On Mon, 1/4/10, zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:

>

> zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net>

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

> Monday, January 4, 2010, 7:01 AM

>

> <heylaurag@. ..> wrote:

> >

> > We have a strong underground following that already knows us as " Traditional

" shortened to TCM or Chinese medicine. It makes no business

sense whatsoever to give that up. I have to say, our profession generally lacks

business sense, sadly.

> >

> > Laura

> Acupuncture Today (jan 2010, vol 11 no 1) leads of with Will Morris' The

Bright Future Of Acupuncture wherein he tells us that Acupuncture gained

recognition in 2009 and has a brand name that shines brightly in the media (at

least in 2009)due mainly to a MLB pitcher and a tv danc-show contestent.

>

> The article goes on to explain that Acupuncture will grow thru low price

models appealing to corporations and government, that community-style

acupuncture will grow and be supported by governments, that our traditional

nomenclature (Liver Qi stagnation with Spleen Qi deficiency) is archaic and must

be replaced with the language of occupational medicine, that we must develop

specialties and quickly evolve to the FPD.

>

> Mr. Morris is the president of Autin, Tx's Academy of Oriental Medicine,

influential to other academics and to many future students. However, He is not a

private clinician, and I do not feel he at all represents those who are, and his

future is certainly not what I am interested in. His retoric is prime example of

what Laura points out: LACK OF BUSINESS SENSE.

>

> The last thing I want is to look to the government for money to treat people.

Can anyone point me to a successful (U.S.) program where a)patients are thrilled

with the results of the care they receive and b) practitioners are happy with

the working environment (paperwork, etc.) and the compensation they receive

(think Veterens Administration) ???????

>

> Blend-in, be the low-price leader by any means, give the schools more

money...these are the steps to success???

>

> I strongly doubt others on this list who are making excellent livings

practicing whatever form (by whatever name) of oriental medicine will agree that

Will's vision is their own.

>

> I think the government should go back to having public hospitals (you remember

the County Hospital, don't you?) available for those who have no other health

care to turn to. As in the past, those who could make other arrangements

(private physician, private insurance, whatever) typically avoided the County

Hospital and chose their own provider.

>

> We need less government, not more. We need people to take responsibility for

themselves, their families, and their choices.

>

> Less than 3% of our Clinic's income came from insurance reimbursement of any

kind in 2009, and thats the way I like it. Clients pay cash, check,

visa/mastercard/ discover for what they want: safe, effective, gentle treatments

with documented progress and true recovery without dangerous drugs (with myriad

" side " effects) and without unneccessary surgeries.

>

> Mark Z

>

> ------------ --------- --------- ------

>

> Subscribe to the free online journal for TCM at Times

http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com

>

> Help build the world's largest online encyclopedia for Chinese medicine and

acupuncture, click, http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com/wiki/ CMTpedia

>

> http://groups. /

group/Traditiona l_Chinese_ Medicine/ join and adjust accordingly.

>

>

>

> Please consider the environment and only print this message if absolutely

necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Andrea Beth and All:

 

I am gladdened to hear that grins might be sprouting as my posts are read.

Thank you.

 

--Andrea Beth-

I don't believe, however, that studying yin-yang theory is sufficient

as a solution for all that ails us as a profession. But yes, we should

be proficient in it.

---

 

You may be right. I wonder about what we call proficiency, however. True

understanding of Yin Yang theory allows an individual to almost immediately

classify and form workable predictions surrounding a phenomena that comes at us

through our human senses. In my experience, many practitioners do not have a

sufficient grasp of the roots of our medicine, and of course, a weakness is felt

when applying it. I come back to a point I raise often here: how committed,

exactly, are we?

 

Does the flux of the yin and yang become evident in our life? Can we see it, do

we *feel* it as it happens? It is one of the reasons I believe Qi Gong should be

compulsory training / education for non-Chinese speakers. Forget the western

university undergraduate degree that will make muddy waters muddier. I believe

that there are only two ways to grasp the core of our medicine: either speak and

write Chinese, or practice deep meditation / Qi Gong. If you don't do one or the

other, you've got to have worries about your grasp of the matter.

 

We have at least three huge systems mixing us up. On the one hand, we have CM,

the real thing. Then we have Biomedicine stirring things up very powerfully.

Then we have new age / alternative medicine / underbelly of biomedicine /

counterculture backlash to contend with as well. Without a direct connection to

the realities that CM is referring to, we risk being lost in these violent

tides.

 

Something to think about at least, I hope.

 

Hugo

 

 

________________________________

Hugo Ramiro

http://middlemedicine.wordpress.com

http://www.middlemedicine.org

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Do you mean those Asian MDs who never believed in Oriental medicine while

in Asia?

 

 

 

 

In a message dated 1/5/2010 10:50:53 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,

naturaldoc1 writes:

 

There will always be a place for the individual practitioner but now we

must act to create more options for future professional growth and let's not

forget the overwhelming support of the Asian practitioners that are behind

this.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Double check your theory. The majority of those practitioners were MDs who

never believed in AOM and only because they were tired of working for

$5/hour in blood banks did they see the opportunity to try to regain sort-of-MD

status through this night-trade-school cottage industry business...first as

so-called teachers.

 

Some who were really qualified .....did and do get their MD licenses.....

but then these individuals are generally not the slightest bit interested

in AOM.

 

Richard

 

 

 

In a message dated 1/5/2010 11:04:56 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,

naturaldoc1 writes:

 

 

No. Try the many Asian practitioners that are in clinical practice or

teach at our many OM schools. They tend to have a deeper understanding of

both and in some cases, some of them actually do get their medical license.

 

 

 

If you are suggesting the belief in neuro vascular node theory, then

probably not too many that support this.

 

Michael W. Bowser, DC, LAc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine

acudoc11

Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:57:16 -0500

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

 

 

 

 

 

Do you mean those Asian MDs who never believed in Oriental medicine while

in Asia?

 

 

 

 

In a message dated 1/5/2010 10:50:53 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,

naturaldoc1 writes:

 

There will always be a place for the individual practitioner but now we

must act to create more options for future professional growth and let's

not

forget the overwhelming support of the Asian practitioners that are behind

this.

 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

 

 

 

 

_______________

Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.

http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/

 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

 

 

---

 

Subscribe to the free online journal for TCM at Times

http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com

 

Help build the world's largest online encyclopedia for Chinese medicine

and acupuncture, click, http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com/wiki/CMTpedia

 

To change your email delivery settings, click,

and adjust

accordingly.

 

Messages are the property of the author. Any duplication outside the group

requires prior permission from the author.

 

Please consider the environment and only print this message if absolutely

necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

New Clients often arrive with western diagnoses, but they always still have

their problem. The reason they come is because, despite having a wonderful and

important sounding diagnosis, THEY STILL HAVE THEIR PROBLEM. Receiving a WM

diagnosis does not make their problem go away, and evidently neither did the

various WM treatments for said diagnosed malady.

 

They ask " Do you have a record of success treating ____________? "

 

Then the education process begins. Our Clients hear the language of CM in their

diagnosis, hear their herb formulas called by their chinese names, and begin to

use the language themselves on a beginner level. They tell their friends " I

used up too much Yin so I need to make more, " or " they said my Qi was stuck. "

 

Often they seem relieved to find we have a different take on their problem, and

thrilled to find that we can very effectively treat that which could not be

treated effectively by their WM practitioner.

 

If we focus on symptoms and wm diagnoses we can be really little more help than

their WM Docs. Maybe we can substitue acu/moxa/herbs for their pain medication.

whoopee!

 

If we do our JOBS correctly, we can correct root imbalances and peoples lives

change! Do this well and repeatedly and YOUR life will change.

 

Mark Z

 

Chinese Medicine , Hugo Ramiro <subincor

wrote:

>

> Hi Z'ev, yes it seems I very much spoke out of turn, although I don't agree

with Will Morris exactly. I fully retract my initial judgement of calling him a

goof. Totally inappropriate. Here's the relevant piece of the article which I

just read:

>

> --William Morris / Acupuncture Today-

> Participating acupuncturists must adapt appropriate physical

> assessment, outcomes measures and report-writing to the culture of

> occupational medicine. Liver qi stagnation and the five

> elements, while important as an in-discipline model of thought, will

> not work in that environment. We must give up the idea that others will

> accept our nomenclature. It is ours and we need it, but they don't. We

> must therefore communicate in a way that our listeners can hear.

> ---

>

> To communicate in a way that my listeners can hear is very important, but to

eliminate myself from the picture is impossible. In other words, if what I am

*truly* doing is treating Liver Qi stagnation, then, somehow, that fact will

express itself, and likely, it will permeate who I am and what I do, even when I

am co-opting western medical terminology and differentials for my purposes.

>

> To pretend that corporations (for example) will not " cave " to our concepts is

to ignore that they have caved in every instance where the circumstances or the

consumers have demanded that they do so. If it is our concepts which allow us to

provide a sustainable medicine, then it is unavoidable that people of all walks

of life accept our terms. Our terms, after all, are based on repeated, tested,

observations.

>

> We must also remember that the people who approach us, be they patients,

representatives of biomedicine and so on, approach us in part *because* of our

terminology. People are tired of the machine metaphor. The machine metaphor will

kill us - it is *that* which must be given up.

>

> On a practical note, it is perfectly possible in my point of view to retain

both terminologies and differentials, one for communication, and the other for

the real work. Just so long as that is the hierarchy that is present.

>

> Thanks,

> Hugo

>

>

> ________________________________

> Hugo Ramiro

> http://middlemedicine.wordpress.com

> http://www.middlemedicine.org

>

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> <zrosenbe

> Chinese Medicine

> Mon, 4 January, 2010 17:43:50

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

> Hugo,

> I haven't read the article yet, but I'd be pretty surprised if Will was

recommending giving up the language of Chinese medicine, knowing how dedicated

he is to the classical medicine, especially pulse diagnosis.

>

> Having said that, I think you've hit the issue right on the head. If we

innately feel that biomedicine is the only 'true' reality in medicine, and that

what Chinese medicine describes is a fiction, then the profession will fade away

eventually and only the needles will survive, not the theory, the herbs, or the

moxa.

>

>

> On Jan 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Hugo Ramiro wrote:

>

> > Hi Andrea Beth and all:

> >

> > --Andrea Beth-

> >

> > We are not of unified opinion on:

> > " medical " acupuncturists

> > the FPD

> > what to call ourselves

> > whether we should all be trained in herbal medicine in addition to

> > acupuncture (be TCM practitioners) or continue to have 2 separate

> > categories of acupuncturists - those who incorporate herbal medicine

> > and those who don't... I see this as a very big source of confusion for

> > our public identity...

> > and other issues that affect our profession and threaten our livelihood

> > ---

> >

> > From my p.o.v. all of the above boil down to one thing, and one thing only,

and it is the thing we must answer *first*:

> >

> > Do we, as individuals, buy into CM, or do we buy into WM?

> >

> > Do we actually believe there is a real thing " parkinson's " ? Do we feel

confused when we think " damp " ?

> > Do we actually buy that " erythema multiformis " is a specialist term

originating from a super-advanced technological medicine...or do we *clearly*

understand that erythema multiformis is a " common language " description from a

language so archaic it's DEAD and meaning no more than (literally) " red skin

many shapes " .

> >

> > And yet we have the goof in Austin saying that we have to give up our

" archaic " language because...there's another *more* archaic language that we'd

rather use?!

> >

> > Let's look at a few WM diagnoses:

> >

> > Schizophrenia - Split Diaphragm / Split Mind (same Phren from phrenology by

the way)

> > Diabetes - " To pass through " . Diarrhea? No, Dia/betes/. Just trying to be

specific.

> > Angina Pectoris - Strangulation in the chest

> > Idiopathic Neuralgia - Something hurts and we don't know how or why

(literally). But we have a name. Ok, ok, let's give that one another shot:

> > Idiopathic Neuralgia - Comes-from-private-suffering Vigor-Sinew pain.

> > Lupus Erythematosus - Wolf Red Sea-Mullet on the skin (that is *spooky*,

people, *spooky*)

> >

> > I hope I amuse you guys.

> >

> > So just to tie this one up: what we might want to look at as a profession is

a course called " yin yang theory " , and if you don't get it, you don't get it

(the degree / certification). I really feel that if we did that, a lot of our

problems would vanish. How to defeat your enemy? Divide their attention, cause

them to doubt themselves. Our attention is being divided very effectively, from

my p.o.v.

> >

> > Happy 2010 everyone!

> > Hugo

> >

> > ________________________________

> > Hugo Ramiro

> > http://middlemedicine.wordpress.com

> > http://www.middlemedicine.org

> >

> > ________________________________

> > <

> > Chinese Medicine

> > Mon, 4 January, 2010 11:05:34

> > Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

> >

> > First the western medical professions take over our medicine, then the

military, and now here comes the FPD. I think the future looks bleak for

acupuncturists (oops, TCM practitioners - but, by the way, no one where I live

has any idea what TCM is, aside from other LAc's), with or without the FPD.

> >

> > Plus, we are lacking a national standard for practice in all 50 of the

United States; indeed, there are some states which still lack an acupuncture

statute, and others require education only in acupuncture (and not also herbal

medicine) for licensure. Still other states authorize only " doctors " to practice

acupuncture. Those that do license acupuncturists, all have differing

educational and exam requirements. How can we be unified on anything, if we are

not trained equally?

> >

> > Even if we were unified in our opinion and strategies for addressing these

issues, we don't have the numbers of practitioners and deep pockets needed to

defend our profession properly. Poor business sense compounds these problems.

> >

> > If any of our brothers and sisters in other countries have addressed these

issues in ways that have been fruitful, I for one, would like to hear from them.

What has been useful, and how is it working?

> >

> > Thank you,

> > Andrea Beth

> >

> > Traditional Oriental Medicine

> > Happy Hours in the CALM Center

> > 635 S. 10th St.

> > Cottonwood, AZ 86326

> > (928) 274-1373

> >

> > --- On Mon, 1/4/10, zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:

> >

> > zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net>

> > Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

> >

> > Monday, January 4, 2010, 7:01 AM

> >

> > <heylaurag@ ..> wrote:

> > >

> > > We have a strong underground following that already knows us as

" Traditional " shortened to TCM or Chinese medicine. It makes no

business sense whatsoever to give that up. I have to say, our profession

generally lacks business sense, sadly.

> > >

> > > Laura

> > Acupuncture Today (jan 2010, vol 11 no 1) leads of with Will Morris' The

Bright Future Of Acupuncture wherein he tells us that Acupuncture gained

recognition in 2009 and has a brand name that shines brightly in the media (at

least in 2009)due mainly to a MLB pitcher and a tv danc-show contestent.

> >

> > The article goes on to explain that Acupuncture will grow thru low price

models appealing to corporations and government, that community-style

acupuncture will grow and be supported by governments, that our traditional

nomenclature (Liver Qi stagnation with Spleen Qi deficiency) is archaic and must

be replaced with the language of occupational medicine, that we must develop

specialties and quickly evolve to the FPD.

> >

> > Mr. Morris is the president of Autin, Tx's Academy of Oriental Medicine,

influential to other academics and to many future students. However, He is not a

private clinician, and I do not feel he at all represents those who are, and his

future is certainly not what I am interested in. His retoric is prime example of

what Laura points out: LACK OF BUSINESS SENSE.

> >

> > The last thing I want is to look to the government for money to treat

people. Can anyone point me to a successful (U.S.) program where a)patients are

thrilled with the results of the care they receive and b) practitioners are

happy with the working environment (paperwork, etc.) and the compensation they

receive (think Veterens Administration) ???????

> >

> > Blend-in, be the low-price leader by any means, give the schools more

money...these are the steps to success???

> >

> > I strongly doubt others on this list who are making excellent livings

practicing whatever form (by whatever name) of oriental medicine will agree that

Will's vision is their own.

> >

> > I think the government should go back to having public hospitals (you

remember the County Hospital, don't you?) available for those who have no other

health care to turn to. As in the past, those who could make other arrangements

(private physician, private insurance, whatever) typically avoided the County

Hospital and chose their own provider.

> >

> > We need less government, not more. We need people to take responsibility for

themselves, their families, and their choices.

> >

> > Less than 3% of our Clinic's income came from insurance reimbursement of any

kind in 2009, and thats the way I like it. Clients pay cash, check,

visa/mastercard/ discover for what they want: safe, effective, gentle treatments

with documented progress and true recovery without dangerous drugs (with myriad

" side " effects) and without unneccessary surgeries.

> >

> > Mark Z

> >

> > ------------ --------- --------- ------

> >

> > Subscribe to the free online journal for TCM at Times

http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com

> >

> > Help build the world's largest online encyclopedia for Chinese medicine and

acupuncture, click, http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com/wiki/ CMTpedia

> >

> > http://groups. /

group/Traditiona l_Chinese_ Medicine/ join and adjust accordingly.

> >

> >

> >

> > Please consider the environment and only print this message if absolutely

necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Chinese Medicine , " heylaurag " <heylaurag

wrote:

 

And, this fact cannot be denied: a profession that requires a doctorate to

practice will be paid more than a profession that does not. Those of us who are

already practicing will be grandfathered in--we won't have to go back and get

the doctorate to practice. But if our medicine is developed with a doctorate

level degree we will all benefit.

>

> Doesn't anyone else get tired of practicing a medicine with all the

responsibilities of being a doctor but being treated like we are massage

therapists? (no offense to massage therapists)

 

Where to start? There are massage therapists charging $30 for full hour

massages in my town, and they can get you in right away! My two massage

therapists charge $50 for half an hour, and don't have an opening available for

weeks.

 

If everybody has the same product and the same service to back it up, the most

conveniently located will get the most business, and the low price leader will

get the next biggest share.

 

Our work is not quite like that!

 

Do you really believe being called Dr. heyLaura will change how medical doctors

feel about You? Do you think patients will offer you more money? Do you think

those with no understanding of what you do will be more interested in it because

you are called Doctor?

 

a) What do you charge now per treatment? b) What would you like to charge? c)

What do you think people SHOULD pay for your services?

 

I suggest you raise your prices to either b or c, work hard, do a good job and

be happy that you can help people. If you are good at it you will get plenty of

opportunities and the more you help the more will come for help.

 

Mark Z

 

Sidenote, funny story:

A couple started care at our Clinic. They both went thru our 4 visit evaluation

period and each improved. They came to me and explained that because of their

financial situation they had decided to seek care closer to home with a

chiropractor who needles and who would accept their insurance plus a minor

co-pay. I explained that all things are not equal, that they would always be

welcome at our Clinic, and wished them luck.

 

Their progress slowed, then stopped, some symptoms returned, some signs

strengthened, but his neck felt better.

 

They returned. They said " can't you tell my Doc where to put the needles? "

 

I explained that would only work for a short time, and that the only true hope

for their Doc was a proper education. They bought more herbs, refined their

understanding of their diets and went back to their DC. I still to this day

answer email questions from them, and their conditions are better, but certainly

not resolved. They are happy to be better, and satisfied with their compromise.

 

These two are the exception. Most our Client's DEMAND the full benefits of CM

because they are Sick & Tired of feling sick and being tired, and having the

only remedy be " more drugs " .

 

Our Clients show-up for their recommended treatments, follow their recommeded

diets, take their herbs, do their stretches and gleefully anticipate their next

re-eval (every 8 treatments) where we chart their progress and set goals for the

next.

 

Upon exceeding 60% recovery (100% being truly healthy) they have the opportunity

to receive an embroidered tennis/polo-style shirt (exactly like those worn by

our staff at outside events and in the Clinic on Thursdays) in exchange for

writing a testimonial and providing 5 people with whom to share (via snailmail)

that testimonial (which is accompanyed by a coupon for a free exam and an

invitation to the Clinic). Most Clients are thrilled to participate, and proud

to wear their shirts (which usually leads to opportunities to share their

experience with those who inquire about the shirt).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Mark mentions, " Do you really believe being called Dr. heyLaura will change how

medical doctors feel about You? Do you think patients will offer you more money?

Do you think those with no understanding of what you do will be more interested

in it because you are called Doctor? "

 

 

 

Yes, that is exactly what has been happening over the years, if you look at what

many AOM schools are doing within hospitals and outpatient clinics and many DAOM

clinical rotations are held within these institutions. We are getting more

respect from both the hospital admin and many MD's as well. This is a combined

effort of outreach with clinical offerings and the new DAOM programs that often

include some western MD's as instructors. When we reach out to include them and

work towards creating a more seamless healthcare setting, they seem to be on

board.

 

 

 

There will always be a place for the individual practitioner but now we must act

to create more options for future professional growth and let's not forget the

overwhelming support of the Asian practitioners that are behind this.

 

Michael W. Bowser, DC, LAc

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine

zaranski

Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:08:40 +0000

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine , " heylaurag " <heylaurag

wrote:

 

And, this fact cannot be denied: a profession that requires a doctorate to

practice will be paid more than a profession that does not. Those of us who are

already practicing will be grandfathered in--we won't have to go back and get

the doctorate to practice. But if our medicine is developed with a doctorate

level degree we will all benefit.

>

> Doesn't anyone else get tired of practicing a medicine with all the

responsibilities of being a doctor but being treated like we are massage

therapists? (no offense to massage therapists)

 

Where to start? There are massage therapists charging $30 for full hour massages

in my town, and they can get you in right away! My two massage therapists charge

$50 for half an hour, and don't have an opening available for weeks.

 

If everybody has the same product and the same service to back it up, the most

conveniently located will get the most business, and the low price leader will

get the next biggest share.

 

Our work is not quite like that!

 

Do you really believe being called Dr. heyLaura will change how medical doctors

feel about You? Do you think patients will offer you more money? Do you think

those with no understanding of what you do will be more interested in it because

you are called Doctor?

 

a) What do you charge now per treatment? b) What would you like to charge? c)

What do you think people SHOULD pay for your services?

 

I suggest you raise your prices to either b or c, work hard, do a good job and

be happy that you can help people. If you are good at it you will get plenty of

opportunities and the more you help the more will come for help.

 

Mark Z

 

Sidenote, funny story:

A couple started care at our Clinic. They both went thru our 4 visit evaluation

period and each improved. They came to me and explained that because of their

financial situation they had decided to seek care closer to home with a

chiropractor who needles and who would accept their insurance plus a minor

co-pay. I explained that all things are not equal, that they would always be

welcome at our Clinic, and wished them luck.

 

Their progress slowed, then stopped, some symptoms returned, some signs

strengthened, but his neck felt better.

 

They returned. They said " can't you tell my Doc where to put the needles? "

 

I explained that would only work for a short time, and that the only true hope

for their Doc was a proper education. They bought more herbs, refined their

understanding of their diets and went back to their DC. I still to this day

answer email questions from them, and their conditions are better, but certainly

not resolved. They are happy to be better, and satisfied with their compromise.

 

These two are the exception. Most our Client's DEMAND the full benefits of CM

because they are Sick & Tired of feling sick and being tired, and having the

only remedy be " more drugs " .

 

Our Clients show-up for their recommended treatments, follow their recommeded

diets, take their herbs, do their stretches and gleefully anticipate their next

re-eval (every 8 treatments) where we chart their progress and set goals for the

next.

 

Upon exceeding 60% recovery (100% being truly healthy) they have the opportunity

to receive an embroidered tennis/polo-style shirt (exactly like those worn by

our staff at outside events and in the Clinic on Thursdays) in exchange for

writing a testimonial and providing 5 people with whom to share (via snailmail)

that testimonial (which is accompanyed by a coupon for a free exam and an

invitation to the Clinic). Most Clients are thrilled to participate, and proud

to wear their shirts (which usually leads to opportunities to share their

experience with those who inquire about the shirt).

 

 

 

 

 

_______________

Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.

http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Hugo et al.,

 

Consumer demand. You've hit on it. This is what needs to grow. Consumer

demand for what we all love and know works, regardless of the practice style.

Far more than the 1% recognized by the last NIH study. 3.1 million in 2007 is

great, but we need more people to use AOM/TCM/... .

 

I would encourage anyone who wishes to go further with constructive ideas about

how to deal with the challenges facing AOM to join the google group,

http://groups.google.comaomcommunity?hl=en , and bounce some ideas around

in that arena. There's quite a bit bouncing around there now.

 

keith

 

 

> To pretend that corporations (for example) will not " cave " to our concepts is

to ignore that > they have caved in every instance where the circumstances or

the consumers have

> demanded that they do so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I am hearing a tone of exclusion in this thread and I happen to think that

neither position is correct. We need to have a stronger understanding of both,

east and western medical understanding like our Asian-trained counterparts.

Larger knowledge base is important for treatment options.

 

Michael W. Bowser, DC, LAc

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine

zaranski

Tue, 5 Jan 2010 13:27:42 +0000

Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

 

 

 

 

 

New Clients often arrive with western diagnoses, but they always still have

their problem. The reason they come is because, despite having a wonderful and

important sounding diagnosis, THEY STILL HAVE THEIR PROBLEM. Receiving a WM

diagnosis does not make their problem go away, and evidently neither did the

various WM treatments for said diagnosed malady.

 

They ask " Do you have a record of success treating ____________? "

 

Then the education process begins. Our Clients hear the language of CM in their

diagnosis, hear their herb formulas called by their chinese names, and begin to

use the language themselves on a beginner level. They tell their friends " I used

up too much Yin so I need to make more, " or " they said my Qi was stuck. "

 

Often they seem relieved to find we have a different take on their problem, and

thrilled to find that we can very effectively treat that which could not be

treated effectively by their WM practitioner.

 

If we focus on symptoms and wm diagnoses we can be really little more help than

their WM Docs. Maybe we can substitue acu/moxa/herbs for their pain medication.

whoopee!

 

If we do our JOBS correctly, we can correct root imbalances and peoples lives

change! Do this well and repeatedly and YOUR life will change.

 

Mark Z

 

Chinese Medicine , Hugo Ramiro <subincor

wrote:

>

> Hi Z'ev, yes it seems I very much spoke out of turn, although I don't agree

with Will Morris exactly. I fully retract my initial judgement of calling him a

goof. Totally inappropriate. Here's the relevant piece of the article which I

just read:

>

> --William Morris / Acupuncture Today-

> Participating acupuncturists must adapt appropriate physical

> assessment, outcomes measures and report-writing to the culture of

> occupational medicine. Liver qi stagnation and the five

> elements, while important as an in-discipline model of thought, will

> not work in that environment. We must give up the idea that others will

> accept our nomenclature. It is ours and we need it, but they don't. We

> must therefore communicate in a way that our listeners can hear.

> ---

>

> To communicate in a way that my listeners can hear is very important, but to

eliminate myself from the picture is impossible. In other words, if what I am

*truly* doing is treating Liver Qi stagnation, then, somehow, that fact will

express itself, and likely, it will permeate who I am and what I do, even when I

am co-opting western medical terminology and differentials for my purposes.

>

> To pretend that corporations (for example) will not " cave " to our concepts is

to ignore that they have caved in every instance where the circumstances or the

consumers have demanded that they do so. If it is our concepts which allow us to

provide a sustainable medicine, then it is unavoidable that people of all walks

of life accept our terms. Our terms, after all, are based on repeated, tested,

observations.

>

> We must also remember that the people who approach us, be they patients,

representatives of biomedicine and so on, approach us in part *because* of our

terminology. People are tired of the machine metaphor. The machine metaphor will

kill us - it is *that* which must be given up.

>

> On a practical note, it is perfectly possible in my point of view to retain

both terminologies and differentials, one for communication, and the other for

the real work. Just so long as that is the hierarchy that is present.

>

> Thanks,

> Hugo

>

>

> ________________________________

> Hugo Ramiro

> http://middlemedicine.wordpress.com

> http://www.middlemedicine.org

>

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> <zrosenbe

> Chinese Medicine

> Mon, 4 January, 2010 17:43:50

> Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

>

> Hugo,

> I haven't read the article yet, but I'd be pretty surprised if Will was

recommending giving up the language of Chinese medicine, knowing how dedicated

he is to the classical medicine, especially pulse diagnosis.

>

> Having said that, I think you've hit the issue right on the head. If we

innately feel that biomedicine is the only 'true' reality in medicine, and that

what Chinese medicine describes is a fiction, then the profession will fade away

eventually and only the needles will survive, not the theory, the herbs, or the

moxa.

>

>

> On Jan 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Hugo Ramiro wrote:

>

> > Hi Andrea Beth and all:

> >

> > --Andrea Beth-

> >

> > We are not of unified opinion on:

> > " medical " acupuncturists

> > the FPD

> > what to call ourselves

> > whether we should all be trained in herbal medicine in addition to

> > acupuncture (be TCM practitioners) or continue to have 2 separate

> > categories of acupuncturists - those who incorporate herbal medicine

> > and those who don't... I see this as a very big source of confusion for

> > our public identity...

> > and other issues that affect our profession and threaten our livelihood

> > ---

> >

> > From my p.o.v. all of the above boil down to one thing, and one thing only,

and it is the thing we must answer *first*:

> >

> > Do we, as individuals, buy into CM, or do we buy into WM?

> >

> > Do we actually believe there is a real thing " parkinson's " ? Do we feel

confused when we think " damp " ?

> > Do we actually buy that " erythema multiformis " is a specialist term

originating from a super-advanced technological medicine...or do we *clearly*

understand that erythema multiformis is a " common language " description from a

language so archaic it's DEAD and meaning no more than (literally) " red skin

many shapes " .

> >

> > And yet we have the goof in Austin saying that we have to give up our

" archaic " language because...there's another *more* archaic language that we'd

rather use?!

> >

> > Let's look at a few WM diagnoses:

> >

> > Schizophrenia - Split Diaphragm / Split Mind (same Phren from phrenology by

the way)

> > Diabetes - " To pass through " . Diarrhea? No, Dia/betes/. Just trying to be

specific.

> > Angina Pectoris - Strangulation in the chest

> > Idiopathic Neuralgia - Something hurts and we don't know how or why

(literally). But we have a name. Ok, ok, let's give that one another shot:

> > Idiopathic Neuralgia - Comes-from-private-suffering Vigor-Sinew pain.

> > Lupus Erythematosus - Wolf Red Sea-Mullet on the skin (that is *spooky*,

people, *spooky*)

> >

> > I hope I amuse you guys.

> >

> > So just to tie this one up: what we might want to look at as a profession is

a course called " yin yang theory " , and if you don't get it, you don't get it

(the degree / certification). I really feel that if we did that, a lot of our

problems would vanish. How to defeat your enemy? Divide their attention, cause

them to doubt themselves. Our attention is being divided very effectively, from

my p.o.v.

> >

> > Happy 2010 everyone!

> > Hugo

> >

> > ________________________________

> > Hugo Ramiro

> > http://middlemedicine.wordpress.com

> > http://www.middlemedicine.org

> >

> > ________________________________

> > <

> > Chinese Medicine

> > Mon, 4 January, 2010 11:05:34

> > Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

> >

> > First the western medical professions take over our medicine, then the

military, and now here comes the FPD. I think the future looks bleak for

acupuncturists (oops, TCM practitioners - but, by the way, no one where I live

has any idea what TCM is, aside from other LAc's), with or without the FPD.

> >

> > Plus, we are lacking a national standard for practice in all 50 of the

United States; indeed, there are some states which still lack an acupuncture

statute, and others require education only in acupuncture (and not also herbal

medicine) for licensure. Still other states authorize only " doctors " to practice

acupuncture. Those that do license acupuncturists, all have differing

educational and exam requirements. How can we be unified on anything, if we are

not trained equally?

> >

> > Even if we were unified in our opinion and strategies for addressing these

issues, we don't have the numbers of practitioners and deep pockets needed to

defend our profession properly. Poor business sense compounds these problems.

> >

> > If any of our brothers and sisters in other countries have addressed these

issues in ways that have been fruitful, I for one, would like to hear from them.

What has been useful, and how is it working?

> >

> > Thank you,

> > Andrea Beth

> >

> > Traditional Oriental Medicine

> > Happy Hours in the CALM Center

> > 635 S. 10th St.

> > Cottonwood, AZ 86326

> > (928) 274-1373

> >

> > --- On Mon, 1/4/10, zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:

> >

> > zedbowls <zaranski (AT) verizon (DOT) net>

> > Re: What's in a Name? The Future of the Medicine.

> >

> > Monday, January 4, 2010, 7:01 AM

> >

> > <heylaurag@ ..> wrote:

> > >

> > > We have a strong underground following that already knows us as

" Traditional " shortened to TCM or Chinese medicine. It makes no

business sense whatsoever to give that up. I have to say, our profession

generally lacks business sense, sadly.

> > >

> > > Laura

> > Acupuncture Today (jan 2010, vol 11 no 1) leads of with Will Morris' The

Bright Future Of Acupuncture wherein he tells us that Acupuncture gained

recognition in 2009 and has a brand name that shines brightly in the media (at

least in 2009)due mainly to a MLB pitcher and a tv danc-show contestent.

> >

> > The article goes on to explain that Acupuncture will grow thru low price

models appealing to corporations and government, that community-style

acupuncture will grow and be supported by governments, that our traditional

nomenclature (Liver Qi stagnation with Spleen Qi deficiency) is archaic and must

be replaced with the language of occupational medicine, that we must develop

specialties and quickly evolve to the FPD.

> >

> > Mr. Morris is the president of Autin, Tx's Academy of Oriental Medicine,

influential to other academics and to many future students. However, He is not a

private clinician, and I do not feel he at all represents those who are, and his

future is certainly not what I am interested in. His retoric is prime example of

what Laura points out: LACK OF BUSINESS SENSE.

> >

> > The last thing I want is to look to the government for money to treat

people. Can anyone point me to a successful (U.S.) program where a)patients are

thrilled with the results of the care they receive and b) practitioners are

happy with the working environment (paperwork, etc.) and the compensation they

receive (think Veterens Administration) ???????

> >

> > Blend-in, be the low-price leader by any means, give the schools more

money...these are the steps to success???

> >

> > I strongly doubt others on this list who are making excellent livings

practicing whatever form (by whatever name) of oriental medicine will agree that

Will's vision is their own.

> >

> > I think the government should go back to having public hospitals (you

remember the County Hospital, don't you?) available for those who have no other

health care to turn to. As in the past, those who could make other arrangements

(private physician, private insurance, whatever) typically avoided the County

Hospital and chose their own provider.

> >

> > We need less government, not more. We need people to take responsibility for

themselves, their families, and their choices.

> >

> > Less than 3% of our Clinic's income came from insurance reimbursement of any

kind in 2009, and thats the way I like it. Clients pay cash, check,

visa/mastercard/ discover for what they want: safe, effective, gentle treatments

with documented progress and true recovery without dangerous drugs (with myriad

" side " effects) and without unneccessary surgeries.

> >

> > Mark Z

> >

> > ------------ --------- --------- ------

> >

> > Subscribe to the free online journal for TCM at Times

http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com

> >

> > Help build the world's largest online encyclopedia for Chinese medicine and

acupuncture, click, http://www.chinesem edicinetimes. com/wiki/ CMTpedia

> >

> > http://groups. /

group/Traditiona l_Chinese_ Medicine/ join and adjust accordingly.

> >

> >

> >

> > Please consider the environment and only print this message if absolutely

necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...