Guest guest Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 Hi Matt, Attilio & All, Attilio wrote: > We need to educate the public, correctly regulate our industry, > ... and get into the hospitals or we're screwed. Matt Bauer replied: > IMO, the very best method to educate the public about CM as a > whole, and also to promote the profession of fully trained > practitioners, is to do so within the context of AP/CM > organizations. The issues raised in this thread, the ones about > insurance billing codes, and others about making a living in this > field, are all best addressed by having organizations that > represent the profession of CM practitioners doing the public > outreach/education on behalf of the profession. I agree 100%. IMO, time and effort spent on influencing DECISION-MAKERS (in Govmt, NHS, individual hospitals, etc.) is FAR better spent than trying to gather EBM-type evidence as to the efficacy of AP. We will all be dead before that happens! We should produce SOLID STATISTICS to the decision-makers to PROVE to them that they can make HUGE FINANCIAL SAVINGS for use in other parts of the Health Budget by having fully trained acupuncturists as the FIRST referral for most pain and functional conditions. That assumes that all patients to be referred for AP shall have had a medical Dx to eliminate more serious conditions (cancer, myocardial ischaemia, etc) as the cause. > It makes no sense for thousands of acupuncturists/CM practitioners > to try to educated the public on their own. IMO, educating the PUBLIC is useful, but educating the DECISION- MAKERS would be much more productive. > This is true in every country, not just USA/UK. We practitioners > should be banding together in our respective countries and making > the goal of educating others about the merits of fully-trained > practitioners THE PRIMARY goal of our organizations. This has not > yet happened anywhere I am aware of. In USA, most of the focus of > our organization has went to political lobbying (legislative > issues) and, to a lesser degree, research. While these are all > noble and useful goals, I am convinced that shifting priority now > to public education will do more to address the problems that face > this field than anything else. Matt, with respect, I disagree. The abstract that you forwarded about huge time delays before first AP session, and also subsequent follow-up sessions, in UK hospitals indicates that the PUBLIC already demands AP, but the SYSTEM cannot (or possibly does not want to) deliver because of lack of adequately trained staff in-house. Influencing the POLITICIANS and DECISION-MAKERS to insist on referrals OUTSIDE the hospital (if the hospitals cannot hire enough qualified acupuncturists) would solve the problem. > [We have] now enough practitioners and enough funds could be raised > to take this on in a serious manner if the will to do so was there. Go for it, but please hit the politicians / decision-makers also. Unfortunately, I have lost a reprint / abstract (published about 20 years ago) that showed the mean cost of treating " backpain " by AP v by conventional methods in UK-NHS System. The difference in cost was HUGE in favour of AP. IMO, the National Groups should run a PROFESSIONALLY DESIGNED SURVEY of all their members to get accurate stats on the following for ALL conditions known to be amenable to successful AP: Much data could be collected (and analysed) very effectively and rapidly if the Survey Forms could be filled in ONLINE. Those with no access to WWW could post back their responses for inclusion later. Condition | Mean number of sessions to " cure " | Mean cost/session | Mean TOTAL COST of " cure " Condition A ... .... Condition Z ... Side by side with that survey, using the Freedom of Information Act (if needed), the National Groups could complie comparative data for the costs of CONVENTIONAL (WM) treatment. Finally, a SUMMARY that shows the BOTTOM LINE could be as follows: Condition AP Cost: X+/-SD WM Cost: X+/-SD X Diff+/-SD Signif Condition A … x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Condition ... x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Backpain~muscular x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Backpain~vertebral/disk x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Elbow pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Hip pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Knee pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Migraine headache x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Shoulder pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Trigeminal neuralgia x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Condition … x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Condition Z ... x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d ALL of the above x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d In planning the Data Forms, and analysing the data, it would be essential to have an expert poll-consultant and one or more expert statisticians on the team IMO, this comparison WOULD SHOW CLEARLY the benefits to the NHS of introducing professional AP as first-line Tx of amenable conditions. International publication of the results, using every means possible (TV, radio, WWW, TCM/AP & WM journals, etc.), would bring uncommitted members of the public, and any politicians who value substantial savings in health costs, on-side. Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc, c/o 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Chinese Proverb: " Man who says it can't be done, should not interrupt man doing it " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 Phil wrote " IMO, educating the PUBLIC is useful, but educating the DECISION- MAKERS would be much more productive. " I respectively disagree with you here Phil. I can really only speak for matters in the US but I suspect some of the same elements apply elsewhere. What I am referring to is a different take on what you stated: " The abstract that you forwarded about huge time delays before first AP session, and also subsequent follow-up sessions, in UK hospitals indicates that the PUBLIC already demands AP, but the SYSTEM cannot (or possibly does not want to) deliver because of lack of adequately trained staff in-house. " Here is the critical difference (IMO); it is true that the public is beginning to demand acupuncture but they are ignorant about the qualifications of different acupuncturists. This is obvious in that people would even consider teaching self-acupuncture in a country where qualified acupuncturists are plenty and having difficulty making a living. Why haven't these hospitals hired qualified acupuncturists and pay them a reasonable salery to meet the demand? Because they do not respect their qualifications. There is much good news about acupuncture, but no one is addressing the qualifications of acupuncturists. Those with the most training have the most to lose when people seem to think that it is the action of needling that is responsible for the good buzz about acupuncture rather than the knowledge of how to chose, manipulate, and manage these therapeutic spots. Who is going to educate the public about the value of higher training if not those with the highest training? I emphasize the public, Phil, rather than " decision-makers " because those decision-makers are too corrupted by their positions of authority to be influenced by a small special-interest group that comes to them and says " We are the best - you should support us. " Such decision-makers are being lobbied by countless special interest groups and when we (the AP community) approach them, we are seen in their eyes as just one more asking for favors. The only way, IMO, that we can really get them to listen is to get the public behind us. We should go directly to the public, educate them about how valuable comprehensive training is and then and only then, will we have the juice to get the decision-makers to listen. I have seen efforts to appeal to such movers and shakers fail again and again here in the states for many years even though we approached them with very sound evidence about the value and cost savings of well applied acupuncture. Well trained acupuncturists have treated millions of patients, and if we could get those patients organized to put pressure on those decision-makers we might finally make much more progress. A wise and well connected government offical told me many years ago " There are two ways to get things done in government; with money or grassroots public support. You guys (the AP community) don't have either one. " I believe we do have resources to organize our patients into a grassroots force and this will do far more for our cause than lobbying decision-makers alone. The time has come for us to stop talking about " acupuncture " and start talking about " acupuncturists. " Best yet - lets get our patients to do the talking for us. - Matt - Chinese Medicine Cc: pa-l ; ACUPUNCTURE Sunday, November 28, 2004 6:41 PM How to influence Govmts to use AP as FIRST-LINE Tx for amenable conditions? Hi Matt, Attilio & All, Attilio wrote: > We need to educate the public, correctly regulate our industry, > ... and get into the hospitals or we're screwed. Matt Bauer replied: > IMO, the very best method to educate the public about CM as a > whole, and also to promote the profession of fully trained > practitioners, is to do so within the context of AP/CM > organizations. The issues raised in this thread, the ones about > insurance billing codes, and others about making a living in this > field, are all best addressed by having organizations that > represent the profession of CM practitioners doing the public > outreach/education on behalf of the profession. I agree 100%. IMO, time and effort spent on influencing DECISION-MAKERS (in Govmt, NHS, individual hospitals, etc.) is FAR better spent than trying to gather EBM-type evidence as to the efficacy of AP. We will all be dead before that happens! We should produce SOLID STATISTICS to the decision-makers to PROVE to them that they can make HUGE FINANCIAL SAVINGS for use in other parts of the Health Budget by having fully trained acupuncturists as the FIRST referral for most pain and functional conditions. That assumes that all patients to be referred for AP shall have had a medical Dx to eliminate more serious conditions (cancer, myocardial ischaemia, etc) as the cause. > It makes no sense for thousands of acupuncturists/CM practitioners > to try to educated the public on their own. IMO, educating the PUBLIC is useful, but educating the DECISION- MAKERS would be much more productive. > This is true in every country, not just USA/UK. We practitioners > should be banding together in our respective countries and making > the goal of educating others about the merits of fully-trained > practitioners THE PRIMARY goal of our organizations. This has not > yet happened anywhere I am aware of. In USA, most of the focus of > our organization has went to political lobbying (legislative > issues) and, to a lesser degree, research. While these are all > noble and useful goals, I am convinced that shifting priority now > to public education will do more to address the problems that face > this field than anything else. Matt, with respect, I disagree. The abstract that you forwarded about huge time delays before first AP session, and also subsequent follow-up sessions, in UK hospitals indicates that the PUBLIC already demands AP, but the SYSTEM cannot (or possibly does not want to) deliver because of lack of adequately trained staff in-house. Influencing the POLITICIANS and DECISION-MAKERS to insist on referrals OUTSIDE the hospital (if the hospitals cannot hire enough qualified acupuncturists) would solve the problem. > [We have] now enough practitioners and enough funds could be raised > to take this on in a serious manner if the will to do so was there. Go for it, but please hit the politicians / decision-makers also. Unfortunately, I have lost a reprint / abstract (published about 20 years ago) that showed the mean cost of treating " backpain " by AP v by conventional methods in UK-NHS System. The difference in cost was HUGE in favour of AP. IMO, the National Groups should run a PROFESSIONALLY DESIGNED SURVEY of all their members to get accurate stats on the following for ALL conditions known to be amenable to successful AP: Much data could be collected (and analysed) very effectively and rapidly if the Survey Forms could be filled in ONLINE. Those with no access to WWW could post back their responses for inclusion later. Condition | Mean number of sessions to " cure " | Mean cost/session | Mean TOTAL COST of " cure " Condition A ... ... Condition Z ... Side by side with that survey, using the Freedom of Information Act (if needed), the National Groups could complie comparative data for the costs of CONVENTIONAL (WM) treatment. Finally, a SUMMARY that shows the BOTTOM LINE could be as follows: Condition AP Cost: X+/-SD WM Cost: X+/-SD X Diff+/-SD Signif Condition A . x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Condition ... x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Backpain~muscular x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Backpain~vertebral/disk x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Elbow pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Hip pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Knee pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Migraine headache x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Shoulder pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Trigeminal neuralgia x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Condition . x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d Condition Z ... x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d ALL of the above x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d In planning the Data Forms, and analysing the data, it would be essential to have an expert poll-consultant and one or more expert statisticians on the team IMO, this comparison WOULD SHOW CLEARLY the benefits to the NHS of introducing professional AP as first-line Tx of amenable conditions. International publication of the results, using every means possible (TV, radio, WWW, TCM/AP & WM journals, etc.), would bring uncommitted members of the public, and any politicians who value substantial savings in health costs, on-side. Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc, c/o 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Chinese Proverb: " Man who says it can't be done, should not interrupt man doing it " http://babel.altavista.com/ and adjust accordingly. If you , it takes a few days for the messages to stop being delivered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 Hi Matt, I couldn't agree more. If your patient is happy with your treatment, get them to write to either their local paper or politician!! Works both ways for you in relation to PR and to every other acupuncturist. Everyone's a winner. Kind regards Attilio D'Alberto Doctor of (Beijing, China) BSc (Hons) TCM MATCM 07786198900 attiliodalberto <http://www.attiliodalberto.com/> www.attiliodalberto.com Matt Bauer [acu.guy] 29 November 2004 06:29 Chinese Medicine Re: How to influence Govmts to use AP as FIRST-LINE Tx for amenable conditions? A wise and well connected government offical told me many years ago " There are two ways to get things done in government; with money or grassroots public support. You guys (the AP community) don't have either one. " I believe we do have resources to organize our patients into a grassroots force and this will do far more for our cause than lobbying decision-makers alone. The time has come for us to stop talking about " acupuncture " and start talking about " acupuncturists. " Best yet - lets get our patients to do the talking for us. - Matt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 Well said Matt! During high school, my father disallowed me to stay out after midnight, and I nor the angels in heaven could convince him through any ounce of logical reasoning to consider otherwise. I enlisted the aid of a few friend's parents..(also friends of my parents), more liberally disposed to allowing their children late hour priveledges. Two or three said they would approach my father in loosening his position and " whammo " it worked! I was soon allowed to stay out until 3 a.m. I'll never forget that early experience. That was the first time in my entire life that I realized the power in enlisting others help in comparison to achieving results by a single body. I have used this strategy innumerable times with positive results. This leads me to believe that getting the public involved in the AP/OM cause would seem to present the most logical and effective way to promote our profession. " There's strength in numbers " definitely applies here. We in a nutshell, just don't have the clout as a profession to effectively promote our endeavors. There's sputs and sputters of it out there, but I am saddened to observe the lack of promotion in mainstream advertising. Advertising costs, though I would think that some of the national organizations, who have comparatively more responsibility...(in my own opinion)...and " depth of pocket " , might launch more viable and powerful advertising/ public relation strategies toward gaining that much needed public support. For a grassroots cause, Mike Eidson - " Matt Bauer " <acu.guy <Chinese Medicine > Monday, November 29, 2004 12:28 AM Re: How to influence Govmts to use AP as FIRST-LINE Tx for amenable conditions? > > Phil wrote " IMO, educating the PUBLIC is useful, but educating the DECISION- > MAKERS would be much more productive. " > > I respectively disagree with you here Phil. I can really only speak for matters in the US but I suspect some of the same elements apply elsewhere. What I am referring to is a different take on what you stated: > > " The abstract that you forwarded > about huge time delays before first AP session, and also subsequent follow-up sessions, in UK hospitals indicates that the > PUBLIC already demands AP, but the SYSTEM cannot (or possibly does not want to) deliver because of lack of adequately > trained staff in-house. " > > Here is the critical difference (IMO); it is true that the public is beginning to demand acupuncture but they are ignorant about the qualifications of different acupuncturists. This is obvious in that people would even consider teaching self-acupuncture in a country where qualified acupuncturists are plenty and having difficulty making a living. Why haven't these hospitals hired qualified acupuncturists and pay them a reasonable salery to meet the demand? Because they do not respect their qualifications. There is much good news about acupuncture, but no one is addressing the qualifications of acupuncturists. Those with the most training have the most to lose when people seem to think that it is the action of needling that is responsible for the good buzz about acupuncture rather than the knowledge of how to chose, manipulate, and manage these therapeutic spots. Who is going to educate the public about the value of higher training if not those with the highest training? > > I emphasize the public, Phil, rather than " decision-makers " because those decision-makers are too corrupted by their positions of authority to be influenced by a small special-interest group that comes to them and says " We are the best - you should support us. " Such decision-makers are being lobbied by countless special interest groups and when we (the AP community) approach them, we are seen in their eyes as just one more asking for favors. The only way, IMO, that we can really get them to listen is to get the public behind us. We should go directly to the public, educate them about how valuable comprehensive training is and then and only then, will we have the juice to get the decision-makers to listen. > > I have seen efforts to appeal to such movers and shakers fail again and again here in the states for many years even though we approached them with very sound evidence about the value and cost savings of well applied acupuncture. Well trained acupuncturists have treated millions of patients, and if we could get those patients organized to put pressure on those decision-makers we might finally make much more progress. A wise and well connected government offical told me many years ago " There are two ways to get things done in government; with money or grassroots public support. You guys (the AP community) don't have either one. " I believe we do have resources to organize our patients into a grassroots force and this will do far more for our cause than lobbying decision-makers alone. . > > The time has come for us to stop talking about " acupuncture " and start talking about " acupuncturists. " Best yet - lets get our patients to do the talking for us. - Matt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 Mike wrote: " Advertising costs, though I would think that some of the national organizations, who have comparatively more responsibility...(in my own opinion)...and " depth of pocket " , might launch more viable and powerful advertising/ public relation strategies toward gaining that much needed public support. " Actually Mike, with good planning you do not need much money to advance the sort of information that would so benefit the AP/CM profession. There are many media outlets who have a constant need for stories and a well thought-out and implemented public education plan would take advantage of these free sources. Years ago, I had a patient who was a media consultant for a public relations firm. We spent a good deal of time discussing how to do public education on a limited budget and she even offered to give the Executive Committee of the acupuncture organization I was involved with a free training on how to carry such a program out with very little budget. I was very disappointed when they turned this offer down. What an opportunity missed. Of course, if one has the money to buy advertising - so much the better! And by the way, in the US, the national membership organizations (AAOM and Alliance) do not have very deep pockets. The organizations in better financial shape are those associated with the schools and exams. These organizations would likely contribute if a sound, comprehensive, and cost-effective plan were put before them AND they could see there was unity behind it. The unity part of this plan is the rub. - Matt - Michael Eidson Chinese Medicine Monday, November 29, 2004 2:29 AM Re: How to influence Govmts to use AP as FIRST-LINE Tx for amenable conditions? Well said Matt! During high school, my father disallowed me to stay out after midnight, and I nor the angels in heaven could convince him through any ounce of logical reasoning to consider otherwise. I enlisted the aid of a few friend's parents..(also friends of my parents), more liberally disposed to allowing their children late hour priveledges. Two or three said they would approach my father in loosening his position and " whammo " it worked! I was soon allowed to stay out until 3 a.m. I'll never forget that early experience. That was the first time in my entire life that I realized the power in enlisting others help in comparison to achieving results by a single body. I have used this strategy innumerable times with positive results. This leads me to believe that getting the public involved in the AP/OM cause would seem to present the most logical and effective way to promote our profession. " There's strength in numbers " definitely applies here. We in a nutshell, just don't have the clout as a profession to effectively promote our endeavors. There's sputs and sputters of it out there, but I am saddened to observe the lack of promotion in mainstream advertising. Advertising costs, though I would think that some of the national organizations, who have comparatively more responsibility...(in my own opinion)...and " depth of pocket " , might launch more viable and powerful advertising/ public relation strategies toward gaining that much needed public support. For a grassroots cause, Mike Eidson - " Matt Bauer " <acu.guy <Chinese Medicine > Monday, November 29, 2004 12:28 AM Re: How to influence Govmts to use AP as FIRST-LINE Tx for amenable conditions? > > Phil wrote " IMO, educating the PUBLIC is useful, but educating the DECISION- > MAKERS would be much more productive. " > > I respectively disagree with you here Phil. I can really only speak for matters in the US but I suspect some of the same elements apply elsewhere. What I am referring to is a different take on what you stated: > > " The abstract that you forwarded > about huge time delays before first AP session, and also subsequent follow-up sessions, in UK hospitals indicates that the > PUBLIC already demands AP, but the SYSTEM cannot (or possibly does not want to) deliver because of lack of adequately > trained staff in-house. " > > Here is the critical difference (IMO); it is true that the public is beginning to demand acupuncture but they are ignorant about the qualifications of different acupuncturists. This is obvious in that people would even consider teaching self-acupuncture in a country where qualified acupuncturists are plenty and having difficulty making a living. Why haven't these hospitals hired qualified acupuncturists and pay them a reasonable salery to meet the demand? Because they do not respect their qualifications. There is much good news about acupuncture, but no one is addressing the qualifications of acupuncturists. Those with the most training have the most to lose when people seem to think that it is the action of needling that is responsible for the good buzz about acupuncture rather than the knowledge of how to chose, manipulate, and manage these therapeutic spots. Who is going to educate the public about the value of higher training if not those with the highest training? > > I emphasize the public, Phil, rather than " decision-makers " because those decision-makers are too corrupted by their positions of authority to be influenced by a small special-interest group that comes to them and says " We are the best - you should support us. " Such decision-makers are being lobbied by countless special interest groups and when we (the AP community) approach them, we are seen in their eyes as just one more asking for favors. The only way, IMO, that we can really get them to listen is to get the public behind us. We should go directly to the public, educate them about how valuable comprehensive training is and then and only then, will we have the juice to get the decision-makers to listen. > > I have seen efforts to appeal to such movers and shakers fail again and again here in the states for many years even though we approached them with very sound evidence about the value and cost savings of well applied acupuncture. Well trained acupuncturists have treated millions of patients, and if we could get those patients organized to put pressure on those decision-makers we might finally make much more progress. A wise and well connected government offical told me many years ago " There are two ways to get things done in government; with money or grassroots public support. You guys (the AP community) don't have either one. " I believe we do have resources to organize our patients into a grassroots force and this will do far more for our cause than lobbying decision-makers alone. . > > The time has come for us to stop talking about " acupuncture " and start talking about " acupuncturists. " Best yet - lets get our patients to do the talking for us. - Matt http://babel.altavista.com/ and adjust accordingly. If you , it takes a few days for the messages to stop being delivered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.