Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

How to influence Govmts to use AP as FIRST-LINE Tx for amenable conditions?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi Matt, Attilio & All,

 

Attilio wrote:

> We need to educate the public, correctly regulate our industry,

> ... and get into the hospitals or we're screwed.

 

Matt Bauer replied:

> IMO, the very best method to educate the public about CM as a

> whole, and also to promote the profession of fully trained

> practitioners, is to do so within the context of AP/CM

> organizations. The issues raised in this thread, the ones about

> insurance billing codes, and others about making a living in this

> field, are all best addressed by having organizations that

> represent the profession of CM practitioners doing the public

> outreach/education on behalf of the profession.

 

I agree 100%.

 

IMO, time and effort spent on influencing DECISION-MAKERS (in

Govmt, NHS, individual hospitals, etc.) is FAR better spent than

trying to gather EBM-type evidence as to the efficacy of AP. We

will all be dead before that happens!

 

We should produce SOLID STATISTICS to the decision-makers to

PROVE to them that they can make HUGE FINANCIAL SAVINGS

for use in other parts of the Health Budget by having fully trained

acupuncturists as the FIRST referral for most pain and functional

conditions. That assumes that all patients to be referred for AP

shall have had a medical Dx to eliminate more serious conditions

(cancer, myocardial ischaemia, etc) as the cause.

 

> It makes no sense for thousands of acupuncturists/CM practitioners

> to try to educated the public on their own.

 

IMO, educating the PUBLIC is useful, but educating the DECISION-

MAKERS would be much more productive.

 

> This is true in every country, not just USA/UK. We practitioners

> should be banding together in our respective countries and making

> the goal of educating others about the merits of fully-trained

> practitioners THE PRIMARY goal of our organizations. This has not

> yet happened anywhere I am aware of. In USA, most of the focus of

> our organization has went to political lobbying (legislative

> issues) and, to a lesser degree, research. While these are all

> noble and useful goals, I am convinced that shifting priority now

> to public education will do more to address the problems that face

> this field than anything else.

 

Matt, with respect, I disagree. The abstract that you forwarded

about huge time delays before first AP session, and also

subsequent follow-up sessions, in UK hospitals indicates that the

PUBLIC already demands AP, but the SYSTEM cannot (or

possibly does not want to) deliver because of lack of adequately

trained staff in-house.

 

Influencing the POLITICIANS and DECISION-MAKERS to insist on

referrals OUTSIDE the hospital (if the hospitals cannot hire enough

qualified acupuncturists) would solve the problem.

 

> [We have] now enough practitioners and enough funds could be raised

> to take this on in a serious manner if the will to do so was there.

 

Go for it, but please hit the politicians / decision-makers also.

 

Unfortunately, I have lost a reprint / abstract (published about 20

years ago) that showed the mean cost of treating " backpain " by

AP v by conventional methods in UK-NHS System. The difference

in cost was HUGE in favour of AP.

 

IMO, the National Groups should run a PROFESSIONALLY

DESIGNED SURVEY of all their members to get accurate stats on

the following for ALL conditions known to be amenable to

successful AP: Much data could be collected (and analysed) very

effectively and rapidly if the Survey Forms could be filled in

ONLINE. Those with no access to WWW could post back their

responses for inclusion later.

 

Condition | Mean number of sessions to " cure " | Mean

cost/session | Mean TOTAL COST of " cure "

 

Condition A ...

....

Condition Z ...

 

Side by side with that survey, using the Freedom of Information Act

(if needed), the National Groups could complie comparative data for

the costs of CONVENTIONAL (WM) treatment.

 

Finally, a SUMMARY that shows the BOTTOM LINE could be as

follows:

 

Condition AP Cost: X+/-SD WM Cost: X+/-SD X Diff+/-SD Signif

Condition A … x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Condition ... x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Backpain~muscular x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Backpain~vertebral/disk x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Elbow pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Hip pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Knee pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Migraine headache x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Shoulder pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Trigeminal neuralgia x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Condition … x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Condition Z ... x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

ALL of the above x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

 

In planning the Data Forms, and analysing the data, it would be

essential to have an expert poll-consultant and one or more expert

statisticians on the team

 

IMO, this comparison WOULD SHOW CLEARLY the benefits to

the NHS of introducing professional AP as first-line Tx of amenable

conditions.

 

International publication of the results, using every means possible

(TV, radio, WWW, TCM/AP & WM journals, etc.), would bring

uncommitted members of the public, and any politicians who value

substantial savings in health costs, on-side.

 

Best regards,

 

Email: <

 

WORK : Teagasc, c/o 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland

Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0]

 

HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland

Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0]

WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm

 

Chinese Proverb: " Man who says it can't be done, should not interrupt man doing

it "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phil wrote " IMO, educating the PUBLIC is useful, but educating the DECISION-

MAKERS would be much more productive. "

 

I respectively disagree with you here Phil. I can really only speak for matters

in the US but I suspect some of the same elements apply elsewhere. What I am

referring to is a different take on what you stated:

 

" The abstract that you forwarded

about huge time delays before first AP session, and also subsequent follow-up

sessions, in UK hospitals indicates that the

PUBLIC already demands AP, but the SYSTEM cannot (or possibly does not want to)

deliver because of lack of adequately

trained staff in-house. "

 

Here is the critical difference (IMO); it is true that the public is beginning

to demand acupuncture but they are ignorant about the qualifications of

different acupuncturists. This is obvious in that people would even consider

teaching self-acupuncture in a country where qualified acupuncturists are plenty

and having difficulty making a living. Why haven't these hospitals hired

qualified acupuncturists and pay them a reasonable salery to meet the demand?

Because they do not respect their qualifications. There is much good news about

acupuncture, but no one is addressing the qualifications of acupuncturists.

Those with the most training have the most to lose when people seem to think

that it is the action of needling that is responsible for the good buzz about

acupuncture rather than the knowledge of how to chose, manipulate, and manage

these therapeutic spots. Who is going to educate the public about the value of

higher training if not those with the highest training?

 

I emphasize the public, Phil, rather than " decision-makers " because those

decision-makers are too corrupted by their positions of authority to be

influenced by a small special-interest group that comes to them and says " We are

the best - you should support us. " Such decision-makers are being lobbied by

countless special interest groups and when we (the AP community) approach them,

we are seen in their eyes as just one more asking for favors. The only way, IMO,

that we can really get them to listen is to get the public behind us. We should

go directly to the public, educate them about how valuable comprehensive

training is and then and only then, will we have the juice to get the

decision-makers to listen.

 

I have seen efforts to appeal to such movers and shakers fail again and again

here in the states for many years even though we approached them with very sound

evidence about the value and cost savings of well applied acupuncture. Well

trained acupuncturists have treated millions of patients, and if we could get

those patients organized to put pressure on those decision-makers we might

finally make much more progress. A wise and well connected government offical

told me many years ago " There are two ways to get things done in government;

with money or grassroots public support. You guys (the AP community) don't have

either one. " I believe we do have resources to organize our patients into a

grassroots force and this will do far more for our cause than lobbying

decision-makers alone.

 

The time has come for us to stop talking about " acupuncture " and start talking

about " acupuncturists. " Best yet - lets get our patients to do the talking for

us. - Matt

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

Chinese Medicine

Cc: pa-l ; ACUPUNCTURE

Sunday, November 28, 2004 6:41 PM

How to influence Govmts to use AP as FIRST-LINE Tx for amenable

conditions?

 

 

Hi Matt, Attilio & All,

 

Attilio wrote:

> We need to educate the public, correctly regulate our industry,

> ... and get into the hospitals or we're screwed.

 

Matt Bauer replied:

> IMO, the very best method to educate the public about CM as a

> whole, and also to promote the profession of fully trained

> practitioners, is to do so within the context of AP/CM

> organizations. The issues raised in this thread, the ones about

> insurance billing codes, and others about making a living in this

> field, are all best addressed by having organizations that

> represent the profession of CM practitioners doing the public

> outreach/education on behalf of the profession.

 

I agree 100%.

 

IMO, time and effort spent on influencing DECISION-MAKERS (in

Govmt, NHS, individual hospitals, etc.) is FAR better spent than

trying to gather EBM-type evidence as to the efficacy of AP. We

will all be dead before that happens!

 

We should produce SOLID STATISTICS to the decision-makers to

PROVE to them that they can make HUGE FINANCIAL SAVINGS

for use in other parts of the Health Budget by having fully trained

acupuncturists as the FIRST referral for most pain and functional

conditions. That assumes that all patients to be referred for AP

shall have had a medical Dx to eliminate more serious conditions

(cancer, myocardial ischaemia, etc) as the cause.

 

> It makes no sense for thousands of acupuncturists/CM practitioners

> to try to educated the public on their own.

 

IMO, educating the PUBLIC is useful, but educating the DECISION-

MAKERS would be much more productive.

 

> This is true in every country, not just USA/UK. We practitioners

> should be banding together in our respective countries and making

> the goal of educating others about the merits of fully-trained

> practitioners THE PRIMARY goal of our organizations. This has not

> yet happened anywhere I am aware of. In USA, most of the focus of

> our organization has went to political lobbying (legislative

> issues) and, to a lesser degree, research. While these are all

> noble and useful goals, I am convinced that shifting priority now

> to public education will do more to address the problems that face

> this field than anything else.

 

Matt, with respect, I disagree. The abstract that you forwarded

about huge time delays before first AP session, and also

subsequent follow-up sessions, in UK hospitals indicates that the

PUBLIC already demands AP, but the SYSTEM cannot (or

possibly does not want to) deliver because of lack of adequately

trained staff in-house.

 

Influencing the POLITICIANS and DECISION-MAKERS to insist on

referrals OUTSIDE the hospital (if the hospitals cannot hire enough

qualified acupuncturists) would solve the problem.

 

> [We have] now enough practitioners and enough funds could be raised

> to take this on in a serious manner if the will to do so was there.

 

Go for it, but please hit the politicians / decision-makers also.

 

Unfortunately, I have lost a reprint / abstract (published about 20

years ago) that showed the mean cost of treating " backpain " by

AP v by conventional methods in UK-NHS System. The difference

in cost was HUGE in favour of AP.

 

IMO, the National Groups should run a PROFESSIONALLY

DESIGNED SURVEY of all their members to get accurate stats on

the following for ALL conditions known to be amenable to

successful AP: Much data could be collected (and analysed) very

effectively and rapidly if the Survey Forms could be filled in

ONLINE. Those with no access to WWW could post back their

responses for inclusion later.

 

Condition | Mean number of sessions to " cure " | Mean

cost/session | Mean TOTAL COST of " cure "

 

Condition A ...

...

Condition Z ...

 

Side by side with that survey, using the Freedom of Information Act

(if needed), the National Groups could complie comparative data for

the costs of CONVENTIONAL (WM) treatment.

 

Finally, a SUMMARY that shows the BOTTOM LINE could be as

follows:

 

Condition AP Cost: X+/-SD WM Cost: X+/-SD X Diff+/-SD

Signif

Condition A . x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Condition ... x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Backpain~muscular x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Backpain~vertebral/disk x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Elbow pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Hip pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Knee pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Migraine headache x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Shoulder pain/arthralgia/arthritis x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Trigeminal neuralgia x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Condition . x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

Condition Z ... x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

ALL of the above x+/-a y+/-b z+/-c p<0.d

 

In planning the Data Forms, and analysing the data, it would be

essential to have an expert poll-consultant and one or more expert

statisticians on the team

 

IMO, this comparison WOULD SHOW CLEARLY the benefits to

the NHS of introducing professional AP as first-line Tx of amenable

conditions.

 

International publication of the results, using every means possible

(TV, radio, WWW, TCM/AP & WM journals, etc.), would bring

uncommitted members of the public, and any politicians who value

substantial savings in health costs, on-side.

 

Best regards,

Email: <

 

WORK : Teagasc, c/o 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland

Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0]

 

HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland

Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0]

WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm

 

Chinese Proverb: " Man who says it can't be done, should not interrupt man

doing it "

 

 

http://babel.altavista.com/

 

and adjust

accordingly.

 

If you , it takes a few days for the messages to stop being

delivered.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Matt,

 

I couldn't agree more.

 

If your patient is happy with your treatment, get them to write to either

their local paper or politician!! Works both ways for you in relation to PR

and to every other acupuncturist. Everyone's a winner.

 

Kind regards

 

Attilio D'Alberto

Doctor of (Beijing, China)

BSc (Hons) TCM MATCM

07786198900

attiliodalberto

<http://www.attiliodalberto.com/> www.attiliodalberto.com

 

 

Matt Bauer [acu.guy]

29 November 2004 06:29

Chinese Medicine

Re: How to influence Govmts to use AP as FIRST-LINE Tx for

amenable conditions?

 

 

A wise and well connected government offical told me many years ago " There

are two ways to get things done in government; with money or grassroots

public support. You guys (the AP community) don't have either one. " I

believe we do have resources to organize our patients into a grassroots

force and this will do far more for our cause than lobbying decision-makers

alone.

 

The time has come for us to stop talking about " acupuncture " and start

talking about " acupuncturists. " Best yet - lets get our patients to do the

talking for us. - Matt

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said Matt! During high school, my father disallowed me to stay out

after midnight, and I nor the angels in heaven could convince him through

any ounce of logical reasoning to consider otherwise. I enlisted the aid of

a few friend's parents..(also friends of my parents), more liberally

disposed to allowing their children late hour priveledges. Two or three said

they would approach my father in loosening his position and " whammo " it

worked! I was soon allowed to stay out until 3 a.m. I'll never forget that

early experience. That was the first time in my entire life that I realized

the power in enlisting others help in comparison to achieving results by a

single body. I have used this strategy innumerable times with positive

results. This leads me to believe that getting the public involved in the

AP/OM cause would seem to present the most logical and effective way to

promote our profession. " There's strength in numbers " definitely applies

here. We in a nutshell, just don't have the clout as a profession to

effectively promote our endeavors. There's sputs and sputters of it out

there, but I am saddened to observe the lack of promotion in mainstream

advertising. Advertising costs, though I would think that some of the

national organizations, who have comparatively more responsibility...(in my

own opinion)...and " depth of pocket " , might launch more viable and powerful

advertising/ public relation strategies toward gaining that much needed

public support.

 

For a grassroots cause,

 

Mike Eidson

-

" Matt Bauer " <acu.guy

<Chinese Medicine >

Monday, November 29, 2004 12:28 AM

Re: How to influence Govmts to use AP as FIRST-LINE Tx for

amenable conditions?

 

 

>

> Phil wrote " IMO, educating the PUBLIC is useful, but educating the

DECISION-

> MAKERS would be much more productive. "

>

> I respectively disagree with you here Phil. I can really only speak for

matters in the US but I suspect some of the same elements apply elsewhere.

What I am referring to is a different take on what you stated:

>

> " The abstract that you forwarded

> about huge time delays before first AP session, and also subsequent

follow-up sessions, in UK hospitals indicates that the

> PUBLIC already demands AP, but the SYSTEM cannot (or possibly does not

want to) deliver because of lack of adequately

> trained staff in-house. "

>

> Here is the critical difference (IMO); it is true that the public is

beginning to demand acupuncture but they are ignorant about the

qualifications of different acupuncturists. This is obvious in that people

would even consider teaching self-acupuncture in a country where qualified

acupuncturists are plenty and having difficulty making a living. Why haven't

these hospitals hired qualified acupuncturists and pay them a reasonable

salery to meet the demand? Because they do not respect their qualifications.

There is much good news about acupuncture, but no one is addressing the

qualifications of acupuncturists. Those with the most training have the most

to lose when people seem to think that it is the action of needling that is

responsible for the good buzz about acupuncture rather than the knowledge of

how to chose, manipulate, and manage these therapeutic spots. Who is going

to educate the public about the value of higher training if not those with

the highest training?

>

> I emphasize the public, Phil, rather than " decision-makers " because those

decision-makers are too corrupted by their positions of authority to be

influenced by a small special-interest group that comes to them and says " We

are the best - you should support us. " Such decision-makers are being

lobbied by countless special interest groups and when we (the AP community)

approach them, we are seen in their eyes as just one more asking for favors.

The only way, IMO, that we can really get them to listen is to get the

public behind us. We should go directly to the public, educate them about

how valuable comprehensive training is and then and only then, will we have

the juice to get the decision-makers to listen.

>

> I have seen efforts to appeal to such movers and shakers fail again and

again here in the states for many years even though we approached them with

very sound evidence about the value and cost savings of well applied

acupuncture. Well trained acupuncturists have treated millions of patients,

and if we could get those patients organized to put pressure on those

decision-makers we might finally make much more progress. A wise and well

connected government offical told me many years ago " There are two ways to

get things done in government; with money or grassroots public support. You

guys (the AP community) don't have either one. " I believe we do have

resources to organize our patients into a grassroots force and this will do

far more for our cause than lobbying decision-makers alone. .

>

> The time has come for us to stop talking about " acupuncture " and start

talking about " acupuncturists. " Best yet - lets get our patients to do the

talking for us. - Matt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike wrote: " Advertising costs, though I would think that some of the

national organizations, who have comparatively more responsibility...(in my

own opinion)...and " depth of pocket " , might launch more viable and powerful

advertising/ public relation strategies toward gaining that much needed

public support. "

 

Actually Mike, with good planning you do not need much money to advance the sort

of information that would so benefit the AP/CM profession. There are many media

outlets who have a constant need for stories and a well thought-out and

implemented public education plan would take advantage of these free sources.

Years ago, I had a patient who was a media consultant for a public relations

firm. We spent a good deal of time discussing how to do public education on a

limited budget and she even offered to give the Executive Committee of the

acupuncture organization I was involved with a free training on how to carry

such a program out with very little budget. I was very disappointed when they

turned this offer down. What an opportunity missed.

 

Of course, if one has the money to buy advertising - so much the better! And by

the way, in the US, the national membership organizations (AAOM and Alliance) do

not have very deep pockets. The organizations in better financial shape are

those associated with the schools and exams. These organizations would likely

contribute if a sound, comprehensive, and cost-effective plan were put before

them AND they could see there was unity behind it. The unity part of this plan

is the rub. - Matt

 

 

 

 

 

-

Michael Eidson

Chinese Medicine

Monday, November 29, 2004 2:29 AM

Re: How to influence Govmts to use AP as FIRST-LINE Tx for

amenable conditions?

 

 

 

Well said Matt! During high school, my father disallowed me to stay out

after midnight, and I nor the angels in heaven could convince him through

any ounce of logical reasoning to consider otherwise. I enlisted the aid of

a few friend's parents..(also friends of my parents), more liberally

disposed to allowing their children late hour priveledges. Two or three said

they would approach my father in loosening his position and " whammo " it

worked! I was soon allowed to stay out until 3 a.m. I'll never forget that

early experience. That was the first time in my entire life that I realized

the power in enlisting others help in comparison to achieving results by a

single body. I have used this strategy innumerable times with positive

results. This leads me to believe that getting the public involved in the

AP/OM cause would seem to present the most logical and effective way to

promote our profession. " There's strength in numbers " definitely applies

here. We in a nutshell, just don't have the clout as a profession to

effectively promote our endeavors. There's sputs and sputters of it out

there, but I am saddened to observe the lack of promotion in mainstream

advertising. Advertising costs, though I would think that some of the

national organizations, who have comparatively more responsibility...(in my

own opinion)...and " depth of pocket " , might launch more viable and powerful

advertising/ public relation strategies toward gaining that much needed

public support.

 

For a grassroots cause,

 

Mike Eidson

-

" Matt Bauer " <acu.guy

<Chinese Medicine >

Monday, November 29, 2004 12:28 AM

Re: How to influence Govmts to use AP as FIRST-LINE Tx for

amenable conditions?

 

 

>

> Phil wrote " IMO, educating the PUBLIC is useful, but educating the

DECISION-

> MAKERS would be much more productive. "

>

> I respectively disagree with you here Phil. I can really only speak for

matters in the US but I suspect some of the same elements apply elsewhere.

What I am referring to is a different take on what you stated:

>

> " The abstract that you forwarded

> about huge time delays before first AP session, and also subsequent

follow-up sessions, in UK hospitals indicates that the

> PUBLIC already demands AP, but the SYSTEM cannot (or possibly does not

want to) deliver because of lack of adequately

> trained staff in-house. "

>

> Here is the critical difference (IMO); it is true that the public is

beginning to demand acupuncture but they are ignorant about the

qualifications of different acupuncturists. This is obvious in that people

would even consider teaching self-acupuncture in a country where qualified

acupuncturists are plenty and having difficulty making a living. Why haven't

these hospitals hired qualified acupuncturists and pay them a reasonable

salery to meet the demand? Because they do not respect their qualifications.

There is much good news about acupuncture, but no one is addressing the

qualifications of acupuncturists. Those with the most training have the most

to lose when people seem to think that it is the action of needling that is

responsible for the good buzz about acupuncture rather than the knowledge of

how to chose, manipulate, and manage these therapeutic spots. Who is going

to educate the public about the value of higher training if not those with

the highest training?

>

> I emphasize the public, Phil, rather than " decision-makers " because those

decision-makers are too corrupted by their positions of authority to be

influenced by a small special-interest group that comes to them and says " We

are the best - you should support us. " Such decision-makers are being

lobbied by countless special interest groups and when we (the AP community)

approach them, we are seen in their eyes as just one more asking for favors.

The only way, IMO, that we can really get them to listen is to get the

public behind us. We should go directly to the public, educate them about

how valuable comprehensive training is and then and only then, will we have

the juice to get the decision-makers to listen.

>

> I have seen efforts to appeal to such movers and shakers fail again and

again here in the states for many years even though we approached them with

very sound evidence about the value and cost savings of well applied

acupuncture. Well trained acupuncturists have treated millions of patients,

and if we could get those patients organized to put pressure on those

decision-makers we might finally make much more progress. A wise and well

connected government offical told me many years ago " There are two ways to

get things done in government; with money or grassroots public support. You

guys (the AP community) don't have either one. " I believe we do have

resources to organize our patients into a grassroots force and this will do

far more for our cause than lobbying decision-makers alone. .

>

> The time has come for us to stop talking about " acupuncture " and start

talking about " acupuncturists. " Best yet - lets get our patients to do the

talking for us. - Matt

 

 

 

 

 

http://babel.altavista.com/

 

and adjust

accordingly.

 

If you , it takes a few days for the messages to stop being

delivered.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...