Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
bhaktajan

Air Too Dirty to Breathe in 345 Counties

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Air Too Dirty to Breathe in 345 Counties

By H. JOSEF HEBERT,

AP

Posted: 2008-03-13 23:08:26

Filed Under: Health News, Nation News, Science News

WASHINGTON (March 13) - The air in hundreds of U.S. counties is simply too dirty to breathe, the government said Wednesday, ordering a multibillion-dollar expansion of efforts to clean up smog in cities and towns nationwide.

The Environmental Protection Agency announced it was tightening the amount of ozone, commonly known as smog, that will be allowed in the air. But the lower standard still falls short of what most health experts say is needed to significantly reduce heart and asthma attacks from breathing smog-clogged air.

EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson called the new smog requirements "the most stringent standards ever," and he said they will require 345 counties - out of more than 700 that are monitored - to make air quality improvements because they now have dirtier air than is healthy.

Johnson said that state and local officials have considerable time to meet the new requirements - as much as 20 years for some that have the most serious pollution problems. EPA estimates that by 2020 the number of counties failing to meet the new health standard will drop to about 28.

About 85 counties fall short of the old standard enacted a decade ago.

Johnson's decision is likely to be met with sharp criticism from health experts and some members of Congress because it goes counter to the recommendations of two of his agency's scientific advisory panels - one on air quality and the other on protection of children.

The new EPA standard will lower the allowable concentration of ozone in the air to no more than 75 parts per billion, compared with the old standard of 80.

The science boards had told the agency that limits of 60 to 70 parts per billion are needed to protect the nation's most vulnerable citizens, especially children, the elderly and people suffering from asthma and other respiratory illnesses.

Johnson said he took those recommendations into account, but disagreed with the scientists.

"In the end it is a judgment. I followed my obligation. I followed the law. I adhered to the science," said Johnson in a conference call with reporters.

Johnson said he did not take into account the cost of meeting the new requirements. States and counties would have to require emission reductions from factories, power plants and cars to meet the tougher health rules.

The EPA has estimated that compliance with a 75 parts per billion smog standard would cost as much as $8.8 billion a year by 2020 when many of the counties are expected to be meeting the requirement. That estimate, however, does not take into account balancing reductions in health care costs that could be even greater.

Electric utilities, oil companies and other businesses had lobbied hard for leaving the smog rule alone, saying the high cost of lower limits could hurt the economy.

The federal Clean Air Act requires that health standards for ozone and a handful of other air pollutants not take costs into account.

But Johnson said that ought to change. He said the Bush administration plans to propose legislation to Congress to overhaul the 1970 law so that in the future costs can be considered when setting health standards.

Any such move is likely to be met with strong opposition in Congress. Health experts and environmentalists view the setting of health standards without consideration of cost as essential for assuring public health.

Clean air advocates called the latest EPA reduction a move in the right direction - but also a political compromise that did not go far enough.

"It's disheartening that once again EPA has missed a critical opportunity to protect public health and welfare by ignoring the unanimous recommendations of its independent science advisers," said William Becker, executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies, whose members will be developing programs to meet the federal air quality requirement.

Becker acknowledged that the tighter the standard the more difficult it will be to meet, but he said: "The public deserves the right to know whether the air they breathe is healthy."

In recent weeks, some of the most powerful industry groups in <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com><st1:State w:st=<st1:place w:st="on">Washington</st1:place></st1:State> have waged an intense lobbying campaign at the White House, urging the administration to keep the current standard.

Electric utilities, the oil and chemical industries and manufacturing groups argued that lowering the standard would require states and local officials to impose new pollution controls, harming economic growth, when the science has yet to determine the health benefits conclusively. The 80 parts per billion standard was enacted by the EPA in 1997, but its implementation was delayed for several years because of court challenges by industry groups.

"Hundreds of counties haven't been able to meet the current standard set a decade ago," said John Kinsman, senior director for environment at the Edison Electric Institute, which represents most of the country's power companies. "Moving the goalpost again will inflict economic hardship on those areas without speeding air quality improvements."

The EPA has said, based on various studies, cutting smog from 80 to 75 parts per billion would prevent between 900 and 1,100 premature deaths a year and mean 1,400 fewer nonfatal heart attacks and 5,600 fewer hospital or emergency room visits. A separate study suggests that tightening the standard to 70 parts per billion could avoid as many s 3,800 premature deaths nationwide.

The EPA by law is not supposed to consider economic cost in establishing the federal health standard for air quality. The agency has estimated that new pollution control efforts to comply with a 75 parts per billion standard would cost as much as $8.8 billion a year, although it acknowledged that does not take into account reductions in health care costs that could be even greater.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.

2008-03-13 09:42:56

<st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region>Sampling of Counties With Poor Air Quality:

<st1:City w:st="on">Philadelphia</st1:City> County, <st1:State w:st="on">Pa.</st1:State>

Air pollution in the county that includes <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Philadelphia</st1:place></st1:City> exceeds EPA guidelines by 20 percent.

Kern County, <st1:State w:st="on">Calif.</st1:State>

Air pollution in the county that includes <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Bakersfield</st1:City>, <st1:State w:st="on">Calif.</st1:State></st1:place>, exceeds EPA guidelines by 68.2 percent.

East Baton Rouge Parish, <st1:State w:st="on">La.</st1:State>

Air pollution in the county that includes <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Baton Rouge</st1:City>, <st1:State w:st="on">La.</st1:State></st1:place>, exceeds EPA guidelines by 21.3 percent.

Lake County, Ind.

Air pollution in the county that includes <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Gary</st1:City>, <st1:State w:st="on">Ind.</st1:State></st1:place>, exceeds EPA guidelines by 2.7 percent.

<st1:City w:st="on">Fulton</st1:City> County, <st1:State w:st="on">Ga.</st1:State>

Air pollution in the county that includes parts of <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Atlanta</st1:place></st1:City> exceeds EPA guidelines by 21.3 percent.

<st1:City w:st="on">New Haven</st1:City> County, <st1:State w:st="on">Conn.</st1:State>

Air pollution in the county that includes <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">New Haven</st1:City>, <st1:State w:st="on">Conn.</st1:State></st1:place>, exceeds EPA guidelines by 17.3 percent.

<st1:City w:st="on">Hamilton</st1:City> County, <st1:State w:st="on">Ohio</st1:State>

Air pollution in the county that includes <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Cincinnati</st1:City>, <st1:State w:st="on">Ohio</st1:State></st1:place>, exceeds EPA guidelines by 9.3 percent.

Harris County, <st1:State w:st="on">Texas</st1:State>

Air pollution in the county that includes parts of <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Houston</st1:place></st1:City> exceeds EPA guidelines by 72.8 percent.

Salt Lake County, <st1:State w:st="on">Utah</st1:State>

Air pollution in the county that includes <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Salt Lake City</st1:place></st1:City> exceeds EPA guidelines by 6.7 percent.

<st1:City w:st="on">Los Angeles</st1:City> County, <st1:State w:st="on">Calif.</st1:State>

Air pollution in the county that includes <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Los Angeles</st1:place></st1:City> exceeds EPA guidelines by 70 percent.

District of <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Columbia</st1:place></st1:City>

Air pollution in the county that includes Washington, D.C., exceeds EPA guidelines by 13.3 percent. Sources: AP, epa.gov

Most Toxic Cities in <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">U.S.</st1:place></st1:country-region>:

Last year, Environmental Data Resources ranked <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region>'s most toxic cities, defined by the amount of man-made chemical in each area's soil. Click through the photos to see the top 10.

10. <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Cincinnati</st1:place></st1:City> | Contaminated Sites: 22,992

Leaking storage tanks: 1,719 | Corrective action reports: 44

9. <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Seattle</st1:place></st1:City>

Contaminated Sites: 46,299

Leaking storage tanks: 1,333

Corrective action reports: 30

8. <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Detroit</st1:place></st1:City>

Contaminated Sites: 64,541

Leaking storage tanks: 5,458

Corrective action reports: 70

7. San Diego

Contaminated Sites: 51,009

Leaking storage tanks: 3,740

Corrective action reports: 18

6. <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Indianapolis</st1:place></st1:City>

Contaminated Sites: 33,857

Leaking storage tanks: 1,206

Corrective action reports: 34

5. Minneapolis-St. Paul

Contaminated Sites: 65,969

Leaking storage tanks: 4,444

Corrective action reports: 52

4. <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Los Angeles</st1:place></st1:City>

Contaminated Sites: 271,360

Leaking storage tanks: 9,920

Corrective action reports: 159

3. <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Portland</st1:place></st1:City>

Contaminated Sites: 62,466

Leaking storage tanks: 20,655

Corrective action reports: 10

2. <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Milwaukee</st1:place></st1:City>

Contaminated Sites: 47,531

Leaking storage tanks: 3,872

Corrective action reports: 41

1. <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Baltimore</st1:place></st1:City>

Contaminated Sites: 88,284

Leaking storage tanks: 0

Corrective action reports: 23 Source: businessweek.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The air out here in Chembur, a suburb of Mumbai would undoubtedly be the most polluted in the World.

 

There was a recent broadcast about the highly developed flora and fauna of the tropical rainforests and the new startup to explore what scientists call the promising canopy of the rainforests which wasn't explored so much in the past since it was too difficult to get on top of these big trees. So they invented meanwhile all kind of specified aircrafts to explore rainforest trees from above and found so many new species which only live in the upper part of rainforest trees.

Although the cohabits are so complex the situation as a whole is very fragile to become unbalanced, one scientist added. Scientists are deeply impressed about the complexity and variety of species who act in concert and hopefully get more respect about God's creation. It cannot be expected that scientists become God conscious, but at least to become conscious about how everything is created with such perfect intelligence.

They also discovered many new orchids and many new fragrances.

 

source: http://rainforests.mongabay.com/0405.htm

 

<table><tbody><tr><td valign="top"><center>

Brookesia peyrierasi chameleon on twig

brookesia10290055.jpg

Brookesia superciliaris chameleon in leaf litter

brookesia10290087.jpg

Brookesia peyrierasi chameleon in hand

calumma_parsonii_0146.gif

Calumma parsonii chameleon

Calumma-globifer-5.gif

Calumma globifer chameleon

Furcifer-lateralis-juv-1.gif

Furcifer lateralis (juvenile)

Furcifer-willsii-female-00.gif

Furcifer willsii (Female)

Furcifer-willsii-female-01.gif

Furcifer willsii (Female)

Furcifer-willsii-male-00.gif

Furcifer willsii (Male)

Uroplatus_phantasticus_01.jpg

Uroplatus phantasticus

uroplatus_fimbriatus0089.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus - head shot from side

uroplatus_fimbriatus0092.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus - dialated pupil

uroplatus_fimbriatus0130.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus with flying insect

uroplatus_fimbriatus222.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus - side angle head shot

phelsuma0002.jpg

Phelsuma Day Gecko, Nosy Mangabe

phelsuma0160.jpg

Phelsuma Day Gecko in leaf

uroplatus_fimbriatus-0142.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus gecko on Nosy Mangabe

uroplatus_fimbriatus-0143.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus gecko on Nosy Mangabe

uroplatus_fimbriatus-0147.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus gecko on Nosy Mangabe

uroplatus_fimbriatus-214.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus gecko on Nosy Mangabe

uroplatus_fimbriatus-215.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus gecko on Nosy Mangabe

Furcifer_gastrotaenia0043.JPG

Furcifer gastrotaenia

calumma_parsonii0009a.jpg

Calumma Parsoniia

calumma_parsonii0017a.jpg

Calumma Parsoniia

calumma_parsonii0066.JPG

Calumma Parsonii

orange_panther_chameleon-th.gif

Orange panther chameleon

</center></td> <td valign="top" width="3">

</td> <td valign="top"><center> Phelsuma-quadriocellata-2.gif

Phelsuma quadriocellata gecko

uroplatus_fimbriatus_0073.gif

Uroplatus fimbriatus gecko

uroplatus_phantasticus_0088.gif

Uroplatus phantasticus gecko

uroplatus_phantasticus_0097.gif

Uroplatus phantasticus gecko

Uroplatus-fimbriatus-001.gif

Uroplatus fimbriatus gecko

Calumma_parsoni_204.jpg

Parson's chameleon in highland forest of Madagascar

Calumma_parsoni_captive_04.jpg

Calumma parsoni chameleon near Perinet

Calumma_parsoni_captive_15.jpg

Calumma parsoni chameleon

Furcifer_gastrotaenia_00.jpg

Furcifer gastrotaenia chameleon

tree_boa_0106.jpg

Tree boa

Uroplatus_phantasticus_01.jpg

Uroplatus phantasticus

phelsuma_ftdau_0008a.jpg

Phelsuma gecko in Ft. Dauphin

phelsuma_ftdau_0020.jpg

Phelsuma gecko in Taolagnaro

Langaha%20madagascariensis%20male%200.jpg

Langaha madagascariensis (male) snake

uroplatus_fimbriatus227.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus - tree trunk, full body

Brookesia-superciliaris-00.gif

Brookesia superciliaris chameleon

Brookesia-thieli-00.gif

Brookesia thieli chameleon

lateralis_green0069.JPG

Green Jeweled chameleon near Isalo

oplurus_cuvieri_4.JPG

Collared iguanid (Oplurus cuvieri) lizard

P_madagascariensis_kochi_0.JPG

Phelsuma madagascariensis kochi

1101-0022.jpg

Panther chameleon's prehensile tail

1101-00640.jpg

Furcifer pardalis chameleon

Furcifer_campani_204.gif

Furcifer campani

Uroplatus_lineata_226.JPG

Uroplatus lineata

Uroplatus_ebenaui_00.JPG

Uroplatus ebenaui

</center></td> <td valign="top" width="3">

</td> <td valign="top"><center> maro0118.jpg

Phelsuma gecko near Maroantsetra

lateralis1020_0087.jpg

Furcifer lateralis chameleon ready to eat insect

uroplatus_fimbriatus213.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus on trunk

uroplatus_fimbriatus-0123.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus on Nosy Mangabe

uroplatus_fimbriatus-208.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus gecko on Nosy Mangabe

uroplatus_fimbriatus-2170.jpg

Uroplatus fimbriatus gecko on Nosy Mangabe

Uroplatus_lineata_226.JPG

Uroplatus lineata

MORE

REPTILE

PHOTOS

 

</center></td> </tr> </tbody></table>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...