dubeyrakesh

Nathuram assasinated Gandhi. I m 99.99% sure that his brother's first name was Gopal. Jinnah was terminally ill for sure during partition. Was that known, partition could/would really be stopped. Thankfully it wasnt. He died in Sept 1948 which about an year after India's independance. The thing about Nehru is confirmed by many authentic people to me but there is no proof of it. It seems that you are much more alienated from India than what your name indicates. The statements you made about Gandhi/India/Hindus seem absolutely true to me. Some people call that pessimism. I call it realism. At least I "hate" Gandhi for that. It was a mistake India is still paying for and will pay for and should pay for. I know nothing about Gandhi's ashes. I also cant figure out why you posted this is this thread. Rakesh

Sushil sorry if I hurt you. Sorry to make that statement. It was a conclusion based upon people I have seen. But I think the "time" has already come. I hope Gaurachandra's ????? imply my words in the previous post. Thanks, Rakesh

Aksh, I hope I am not getting you correclty. If u mean to say that I am the owner of the site and trying to advertise it, then lemme tell you that I have been posting here long before this post.But then u may consider that to be "confidence buliding". I sincerely hope that you misinterpreted something before posting. I hope that u are referring to 2 different Rakesh Dubeys (That would be height of coincidence) Rakesh

Shvu, I meant to convey that the approach of always expecting to be protected is wrong. Get protected today from something wrong. Tommorow, be able to protect someone from wrong. May be I should have started my example with "Even a child..." Thanks, Rakesh

Hey guys, Your sense of humour is great but PLEASE reply to my post. Thanks Rakesh

Great spirit Sushil, But posting here in this forum is different than doing it. You try it and , forget muslims or christians, Hindus will be the first ones to slaughter you in case you dare. And Shvu, you did not mention why does Hinduism always need to be protected? Do you agree that it should be that way? A Child needs to be protected by his parents. But when he grows up, its his duty to protect his parents when they become weak. What say ya? Rakesh

Shvu, I am not saying here that demoloshing of Babri Masjid was correct. I know that the BJP HINDUS brought down the Mosque. I know what happened during the 1992 riots. But a Gandhian approach doesnt work against a Aurangzebian. If you pamper a child over a certain limit, he is bound to pounce on you once he knows he can. Hinduism is good but it should not project itself as weak. Somehow there is a pattern emerging in India that Hinduism is religion of the weak. When Kamla Das embraced Islam, the coverage that the media gave was overwhelming. What were we trying to prove? A classic example of "victim enjoying the rape" Amitabh Bachchan once asked a question in Kaun Banega Crorepati: Whose name was Dilip Kumar before he became a famous Music director in Bollywood? Answer was A R Rehman. The Big B went on to add that how A R Rehman embraced Islam and all that crap. My question is that just like care about someone in our family, do we share anything on the religion level? No. Have we tried to think why someone embraces other religion? No. Why should we? Its not bothering us as an individual. Moreover religion is something personal. Correct? No. Somehow "rejecting" Hinduism - insulting pandits, literature etc - is emerging as a fashion in India. Its common in movies and tele serials. All people in this forum are intelligent above average. But intelligent is not just speaking intelligently. You also need to ACT against something wrong. Let me be more clear- Hindus are secular. That means we treat all religions equally INCLUDING HINDUISM. Simple. My younger brother once made a very "realistic" statement that while religion unites other people it divides Hindus. I think he is one person alive who thinks about these issues more intelligently than me. I believe that the creator of Hinduism had all this in mind when he created it. But I want to have answer as to what he thought about these issues. You said: One thing to consider. In spite of being under the rule of a fanatic religion like Islam for centuries, Hindus have protected hinduism from deterioration. I am sure you know the story of why there are only pundits in Kashmir and no other types of Hindus. On the other hand there are stories of a fanatic Shaiva king [don't remember the name] who killed several Buddhists because they were not Hindu. My question is does Hinduism always need to be "protected"? Can it not become strong enough to protect someone else? Or to fight the "stronger" wrong? Are our 36Cr weaker than Allah or Jesus so that they should be protected always? Crap. The fact that you are giving reasons makes me feel weak. Lastly, I dont know why there are only pundits and no other Hindus in Kashmir. Please lemme know. Thanks Jagat for you are someone who is close to reality, Rakesh

Dear Sushil and Animesh, The link you provided is already displayed on www.hinduism.org as one of the parameters against Hinduism. My logic is simple: If M F Hussain paints nude pictures of Saraswati, itk OK because freedom of expression is a fundamental right of an Indian irrespective of whether he is a Hindu or Muslim etc. But you dare not utter a word against other religions because it might hurt their sentiments. Or because they may come out with swords ready to kill or die. I dont know if and how is it possible to hurt a Hindu. Hindus are "unhurtable". If the Ram mandir was brought down for constructing a Mosque, its OK. But you dare not think about constructing a temple again because its against secularism. I once again state that there is a basic flaw in Hinduism: Respect all religions except Hinduism. Or more specifically, limit your respect to forums like these etc. Respect only till the point you as an individual is not hurt. This applies to 99% of Hindus. There are exceptions always. Making it simpler: People in general are becoming individualistic. Individualism differs from individual to indivudual. A "Hindu" individualistic person will give a damn to his religion (forget "do or die"). People belonging to other religion have their religion within theri Individuality at least to some extent. Do reply. Animesh, I agree with what you say. But what happens actually is - Just because you are human, it will be fair if we think that huamns have a right to write anything against Hinduism but Hindus have no right to write whatever they feel like against other religions. This applies to 99%. There are exceptions. Mr Dasanudas, Thanks for your more "realistic" reply. That helped. I have some question which I will post soon. Thanks, Rakesh.

Hi alfa1, Is knowledge of any use if it cannot be transeffered? Why did you create the web site? You said: Why Yoga is more advanced than the science? For example Prana is not known in science. If thats all you know, thanks for your information. I dont want to admire yoga without knowing reasons. Rakesh.

Hi alfa1, I know much about Einstein and not much about yoga. I could not understand your approach towards trying to disown Einstein's theory. If yoga is way above todays science, why was the knowlegde not transeffered by our saints and yogis to us. Is any yogi alive on this earth today? What is your knowledge about yoga and whether/how are you further pursuing it? (Its not just browsing over the internet I suppose) And some suggestions: Better remome the scroll-bar in the top-frame by just increasin its height a little. I dont know where you hail from, but there are a few spelling and grammatical mistakes there. Thanks, Rakesh

Excellent stuff. Wonder where you got this from? A woman cant create these Please read the 24th one before replying. Rakesh

Thanks Mr Dasanudas, I completely agree with your assertion- This Martya Loka is fast trakking to pralaya. But this thought or approach towards life is literally disastrous for youths like me. I dont know where is my life heading to and where should it head. And does whatever SM stated mean that nothing SHOULD be done for betterment of the current scenario simply because nothing CAN be done. For a human, this is pure pessimism. A trancendentalist may think otherwise. I dont know where I belong or SHOULD belong. You say:If we don't voluntarily come to the point of saranagati then the environment helps us either directly or indirectly. But is that happening? Does not appear that way. More and more of the world is becoming fanatic at a exponential rate. Tommorow is a religious war begins, Hinduism will lose first. It would be like losing even before fighting. Again, for a human, this is pure weakness. And again, a trancendentalist may think otherwise. And still again, I dont know where I belong or SHOULD belong. For the Das controversy, I referred the administrator of the site, Mr J N Das. Since I do not belong to ISCKON, I am not sure if I should give my energy and time to Krsna or one of the other 36Cr-1 gods. Thanks again, Rakesh. Feel free to contact me @ dubeyrakesh@indiadivine.com

Please note that the domain name is available for sale for only $1.5M Anyone? Rakesh.

Please visit www.hinduism.org site and see for yourself how openly the sanatan dharma is abused by that B******. Hinduism is getting raped and the irony is that the victim is almost enjoying the rape. We can and will do nothing more than react here in this forum; or wait for Kalki! Mr Das, just a reminder, you havent acknowledged my email sent to you about 2 weeks back. Thanks all, Rakesh.

Mr Das, I send you a mail just before the server went down. Not sure if that reached you. I dont think the mail server is fully functional as yet. Mails seem to bounce. Thanks, Rakesh Dubey

That does not answer my question. Am I a vaishnava if I worship Krishna? Is all that praise for me! :-) Thanks, Rakesh Dubey

Who is a Vaishnava? Rakesh Dubey

Shvu, There is nothing "not necessarily" when we are talking about our Vedas/Shastras. My question was what our literarure says about Kaliyuga's end? Also, what will exactly happen when PRALAYA occurs? Thanks, Rakesh Dubey

Shvu, There is nothing "not necessarily" when we are talking about our Vedas/Shastras. My question was what our literarure says about Kaliyuga's end? Also, what will exactly happen when PRALAYA occurs? Thanks, Rakesh Dubey

I think all the religious scholars (and novices like me) in this forum agree (or at least believe) that the Shashtras/Vedas are the ultimate destination of any knowledge that has ever been or will ever be gained by mankind. Thanks, Rakesh Dubey.

I think that on Religion level, only Hinduism states that this material world is a illusion. Christainity or Islam dont indicate that. Thats precisely why these religions are "prospering" but Hinduism is not. These religions at the most teach ways and means to live THIS life more happily/satisfactorily. In other words followers of these religions LIE to self that this life is not a lie and live happily in this lie. I also believe this - the founders of these religions did nothing but LIED big trying to hide the TRUE LIE and gave birth to a HAPPIER/SUPERIOR RELIGION. So A R Rehman achieved material success (and may be "mental satisfaction") in this LIE when he embraced Islam. He may be TRULY respecting his religion and admire its power/miracles but all this is hidden within a LIE. I believe that there cannot be multiple Supreme Powers. Its either "Ishwar" or "Allah" or "God"/"Jesus". The learned people may like to throw some light. Thanks all, Rakesh Dubey

Mr Das, You said that the material world is an illusion. This is same as Hinduism calling this life as mithya or a lie. Which is again same as what is shown in the movie "The Matrix" in which the director tries to show that this world is nothing but a externally controlled system. But simply stating things/facts is not enough. In its vast literature does Hinduism provide facts/figures to "prove" this lie. Otherwise for the layman, the director of The Matrix is better than Hinduism literature. I really wonder, why does our literature just state so many things without providing facts and figures. It results in it being made fun of, rather than being respected. Thanks, Rakesh Dubey.

This is BULLSHIT but as I have said in my precious posts that Hinduism is like public-property. Anyone may use it for their own profit and still get way with saying anythig about it. I really wonder why nowhere in its vast literature does Hinduism doesnt demand to be respected. Forget people from other religions, Hindus themselves do not respect their religion. I am speaking in general terms and not specific to someone.I will continue in my next post.

Will the kaliyuga end with PRALAYA?