If Vedic astrology was imported, and not inherent in Vedic civilization then why do astrological omens play such a large role in events in the Mahabharata and Ramayana?
What is Naavya Shastra's basis for contending Vedic astrology does not originate from the Vedic civilization?
Also, while I understand Naavya Shastra is a reform group for Hinduism, and their intentions are noble, I don't think it's right to target any group of individuals for condemnation or any criticism of private matters. Even if people choose to take that group's actions as an example in their lives. People were endowed with common sense, and free will, they should exercise that.
In any case, I have my doubts to the validity of astrology, as it is pretty vague, but some of it rings true in my case and in the cases of my family members. I don't think it's right to openly dismiss it simply because science has found no real evidence (yet) for the validity of much of astrology. It's like saying just because there's no evidence for God, people should dismiss the concept as mere superstition.
If Naavya Shastra really wants to open eyes, they shouldn't be offending the religiosity of Hindus everywhere, they should be appealing to them to keep in mind that it's important to see God in everyone, regardless of status in life, or whatever influence the stars/planetary alignments may have. The minute you offend someone by saying so-and-so is superstitious claptrap, that person's ears and eyes will be closed and you've lost them for good as far as dialogue is concerned.
As for astrology itself, I actually do want to believe in it, but I have my doubts of course. I take whatever's said as far as astrological portents with a grain of salt, but it doesn't hurt to be wary (most times at least) of possible issues that come up in your life.
And my understanding for astrological basis is that it's a matter of vibrations influencing thought, mode of life, and synchronicity (something even some psychologists such as Carl Jung take very seriously).
|