Dear Nimmi,
No, the reason is that malefics by reason of house lordships tend to damage the
bhava in which they are posited. This is the reason that even lord of dusthana
in the same dusthana gives good results of that bhava and bad results of the
bahva are suppressed.
Regards,
Chandrashekhar.
----- Original Message -----
From: Nimmi Ragavan
To: srijagannath (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 5:06 PM
Subject: [SJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Re: Achyuta Gurukul] Re: Achyuta Gurukul] Re:
Achyuta Gurukul] Re: Achyuta Gurukul] 14th meeting proceedings, mumbai chapter
Dear Chandrashekhar,

Would not the parivarthana strengthen both dusthanas and enable them to produce
more malefic effects?

Best regards,

Nimmi
----- Original Message -----
From: Chandrashekhar
To: srijagannath (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 7:53 PM
Subject: [SJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Re: Achyuta Gurukul] Re: Achyuta Gurukul] Re:
Achyuta Gurukul] 14th meeting proceedings, mumbai chapter
Dear Mr. J K Dasgupta,
I personally do not understand from where the theory of Vipareeta Rajayoga
planets needing to be weak has arisen, though many learned astrologers
subscribe to it.
The logic behind Vipareeta Rajyoga is the same that applies to Malefics being in
Dusthanas.Lord of a Dusthana weakens results of another Dusthana in which he is
psited and vice-a-versa thus giving rise to a Rajyoga as 2 Dusthanas loose
their power to give bad results. If this logic is correct then a powerful Lord
of a dusthana exchanging places with another dusthana lord should give better
results and not worse.

Abaout the reason of the progeny results, you must have observed from my posts
that I hold the view that Divisional charts positions should be analused only
for asessing the strenghts of planet in respect of what the particular D Chart
represents and these should be applied to aspects etc. in Natal Chart. Even
ancient texts give more strengths to Navamsha position over that in natal chart
and not to other D Charts.Even here I always feel that the aspects of Navamsha
Charts should not be considered and these should be seen only in Natal Charts
unless specifically stated in the Shlokas. The reason is that for the same
Navamsha the nakshtra lordship would be different and results would vary. I do
not think that the Ancient sages who devised the Shastras which we are not able
to fully comprehend even now missed this fact of diferent Nakshtra lordships of
same Navamshas in Different Rasis. As a matter of fact I am still trying to
write a paper on this to be presented at Mumbai conference as desired by
Sanjayji of me.
About the D-7 Chart, I we proceed logically(applying Viveka) instead of
empirical formulae,Lord of 5th in the Natal Chart is posited in Venus
saptamsha.Mars depositor of the 5th lord natal Chart is in Saturn Navamsha.Ketu
posited in 5th in Natal Chart is in Kumbha Navamsha.The saptamsha Lagna it self
is Lagna of Moon. So Hermaphordaites and Female planets have the greatest
effect on the D 7Chart.The effect is also carried on to the Natal Chart hence
the efects obtained by the Native.
I personally prefer to use only Natal and navamsha charts to analyse a chart as
I have found that for my limited knowledge and intelligence they provide enough
information for arriving at the probable predictions.Too many parameters tend to
give rise to wrong inferences in my case.
I wanted this post to be short, but thought it better to explain how I like to look at a chart.
Regards,
Chandrashekhar.
----- Original Message -----
From: j.k. dasgupta
To: srijagannath (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 7:46 PM
Subject: [SJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Re: Achyuta Gurukul] Re: Achyuta Gurukul] 14th
meeting proceedings, mumbai chapter
dear Mr. chandrashekhar,

you are correct..mars is the 3rd lord..it was a over look. my comments are as below in capital,
----- Original Message -----
From: Chandrashekhar
To: srijagannath (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 12:58 AM
Subject: [SJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Re: Achyuta Gurukul] 14th meeting proceedings, mumbai chapter
Dear J.K.Dasgupta,
I am just a student of astrology but would like to give my comments on the chart.
First is that the chart that you have attached shows Mars to be lord of the
3rd/10th and not 4th as stated in your mail.The native has Aquarius ascendant
and 4th lord is Venus.
Sun in 9th in debilitation and place of 9th lord in 8th indicates lack of
pitrusukha ( could be because of being away from father)
Ascendant lord Saturn Vargottama in 6th aspects 12th house which is his own
bhava(indicating income abroad as Saturn aspects yogakaraka Venus) and is
stronger than Mars whom he conjoins. Again Mars is joined by his Ucchanath thus
reducing effect of its debilitation. His being an engineer and to do with Gas
etc is the result of this combination and Saturn's aspect of the 3rd.
About property not only 4th house but association of Jupiter with 4th house is
to be taken into consideration.Here Jupiter(which is exalted in Navamsha)
aspects 4th house and conjoins lord of the 4th Venus.
He has Vipareet rajyogas by the reason of 3rd and 12th lord in 6th and 6th lord
in 8th. Mercury is also capable of causing Yoga as being a trinal lord it is in
angle.Both Ketu and Rahu are in exaltation in the chart. Moreover the native has
Kedar Yoga one of the Nabhasa Yogas. Besides Gajakesari Yoga he also has
neechabhanga of debilitated Venusas its Ucchnath Jupiter is in Kendra(By
association) with Moon and with Venus.The native must have had unexpected
opportunities leading to his Bhagyaodaya.

YES, YOU ARE RIGHT.. HE HAD SUCH OPPORTUNITIES. BUT DOES THE VEPAREET RAJAYOGA
IS REALLY VERY EFFECTIVE HERE? AS SAT IS QUITE STRONG IN Cn. FOR VEPAREET
RAJAYOGA..BOTH THE PLANETS HAVE TO BE WEEK..AS I KNOW.

Reagrding progeny 5th house is occupied by Rahu and is devoid of aspect of any
Purushagraha.Venus is posited in the house of 5th Lord Mercury the depositor of
5th lord i.e. Mars is posited in Cancer ruled by Moon.Again Navamshesh of 5th
lord Mercury is Moon,need I say more about his female children?
I think this chart , in a way, supports my views often expressed on this list
that taking into consideration too many parameters makes one miss what is
obvious if you look at Natal and Navamsha Charts.

YOU ARE RIGHT TO STATE THAT PRESENCE OF RAHU IN 5TH OF RASI CHART IS NOT WELL
FOR MALE CHILD. BUT SHOULD IT NOT GET REFLECTED IN D7? OR WE ARE MISSING HERE
SOMETHING?

I would appreciate your comments on my analysis. It would enable me to
understand more about this divine science.
Regards,
Chandrashekhar.

----- Original Message -----
From: j.k. dasgupta
To: srijagannath (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:55 PM
Subject: [SJC: Achyuta Gurukul] 14th meeting proceedings, mumbai chapter
Respected Gurus and all list learned members,

Our 14th meeting was held on 2.2.03 the same was attended by,

1. Dr. Ramchandani
2. Dr. Sharma (new member)
3. Praveen
4. Sunil John
5. DasguptaWe had discussion on 1 horoscopes. The horoscope attached herewith in
jhl4.1 format.

Doubts faced during the discussion are sumerised below, for which we look
forward for guidance.
===============================================
A male chart:
1.11.1945
15:05 pm
73E55, 18N31

1. Almost whole life the native leaved away from his family..working in foreign
land in difficult circustances and earned lot of money. He has some properties
also. This is not clearly indicated in the chart.

In rashi 4L mars debltd and conjoins his enemy sat in 6th.. may be the reason
that he was devoid of family conforts on a/c of his service in difficult
circumstances (sat mars conbination in 6H).. but in that case it should creat
problem for property also as mars is the karaka for property and 4L also. also
deblt malefics in dusthana should be bad for material gain.. unless retro, this
rule seems not to be implied here.

7L for foregn travel is in 11th from AL..but debilated. That may show that he
might have benefitted from foreign travels and short assignments but he should
have faced problems in travel..which was never the case. in his D10 also..lagna
lord and 10th lord mer in 12th shows his foreign assignments but 7H has 6L sat
with 12L sun and ketu in ..should not be a very happy situation. How to
understand the big wealth earned by him thru his proffession..from his D10? He
is a civil engineer connected to gas and petrolium sector and presently in a
very high position in a private company in mumbai. we were unable to establish
this from the D10

Look at 8H in rashi..gajakeshari yoga there..with debltd venus. What does it
indicate? He has list interest in learning occult subjects.

2. He has 2 daughters.

In his D7, Lagna is Cn..even rashi..so count backward. 9H is Pi..male rashi, so
the first child should be male. Jup is also in Cn..Cn is also counted as male
rasi. 3rd from Pi counting, backward is Cp..in between ketu comes..so 2nd issue
will be seen by Aq. Aq lord sat is again with 2 male rashis, one of them is
exaulted..so 2nd issue also should be male. For ketu being inbetween.. there
should a gap between 2 issues, which is there, nearly 7 years gap.

Please provide us further guidance.

Regards

dasgupta[Om Kleem Krishnaaya Jagannathaaya namah]Send a blank mailTo subscribe:
srijagannath-subscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) comTo unsubscribe:
srijagannath-unsubscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Om Kleem Krishnaaya Jagannathaaya namah]Send a
blank mailTo subscribe: srijagannath-subscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) comTo unsubscribe:
srijagannath-unsubscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Om Kleem Krishnaaya Jagannathaaya namah]Send a
blank mailTo subscribe: srijagannath-subscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) comTo unsubscribe:
srijagannath-unsubscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Om Kleem Krishnaaya Jagannathaaya namah]Send a
blank mailTo subscribe: srijagannath-subscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) comTo unsubscribe:
srijagannath-unsubscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Om Kleem Krishnaaya Jagannathaaya namah]Send a
blank mailTo subscribe: srijagannath-subscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) comTo unsubscribe:
srijagannath-unsubscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.