Vrajanatha: Once another teacher said that the
jiva is nothing but a reflection of
brahma. The sun is reflected in water, and similarly,
brahma becomes
jiva when it is reflected in
maya. Is this conception correct?<o:p></o:p>
Babaji: Again this is simply another example of Mayavada philosophy.<o:p></o:p>
Brahma has no limits, and a limitless entity can never be reflected. The idea of limiting
brahma is opposed to the conclusions of the
Vedas, so this theory of reflection is to be rejected.
Vrajanatha: A
dig-vijaya sannyasi once told me that in reality there is no substance known as
jiva. One only thinks of himself as a
jiva because of illusion, and when the illusion is removed, there is only one indivisible
brahma. Is this correct or not?<o:p></o:p>
Babaji: This is also Mayavada doctrine which has no foundation at all. According to
sastra,
ekam evadvitiyam: “There is nothing apart from
brahma.” If there is nothing except
brahma, where has the illusion come from, and who is supposed to be in illusion? If you say that
brahma is in illusion, you are saying that
brahma is not actually
brahma; rather, it is insignificant. And if you propose that illusion is a separate and independent element, you negate the undivided oneness (
advaya-jnana) of
brahma.<o:p></o:p>
Vrajanatha: Once an influential
brahmana pandita arrived in Navadvipa, and in a conference of intellectuals, he established that only the
jiva exists. His theory was that this
jiva creates everything in his dreams, and it is because of this that he enjoys happiness and suffers distress. Then, when the dream breaks, he sees that he is nothing but
brahma. To what extent is this idea correct?
<o:p></o:p>
Babaji: This is, again, Mayavada. If, as they say,
brahma is undifferentiated, how can it possibly produce the
jiva and his dreaming state? Mayavadis use examples, such as, ‘the illusion of seeing mother-of-pearl in an oyster shell as gold’ and ‘the illusion of taking a rope to be a snake,’ but their philosophy cannot provide a consistent basis for
advaya-jnana.<o:p></o:p>
Vrajanatha: So
maya has nothing whatever to do with creating the
svarupa of the
jivas – this has to be accepted. At the same time, I have also clearly understood that the
jiva is by nature subject to the influence of
maya. Now I want to know, did the
cit-sakti create the
jivas and give them their
tatastha-svabhava (marginal nature)? <o:p></o:p>
Babaji: No, the
cit-sakti is
paripurna-sakti, the complete potency of Krsna, and its manifestations are all eternally perfect substances.The
jiva is not
nitya-
siddha, although when he performs
sadhana, he can become
sadhana-siddha and enjoy transcendental happiness like the
nitya-siddhas, eternally perfect beings. All the four types of Srimati Radhika’s
sakhis are
nitya-
siddha, and they are direct expansions (
kaya-vyuha) of the
cit-
sakti, Srimati Radhika Herself. All the
jivas, on the other hand, have manifested from Sri Krsna’s
jiva-
sakti. The
cit-
sakti is Sri Krsna’s complete
sakti, whereas the
jiva-
sakti is His incomplete
sakti. Just as the complete
tattvas are all transformations of the complete potency, similarly innumerable atomic, conscious
jivas are transformations of the incomplete
sakti.<o:p></o:p>
Sri Krsna, being established in each of His
saktis, manifests His
svarupa according to the nature of that
sakti. When He is situated in the
cit-
svarupa, He manifests His
svarupa as Sri Krsna and also as Narayana, the Lord of Paravyoma; when He is situated in the
jiva-
sakti, He manifests His
svarupa as His
vilasa-murti of Vraja, Baladeva; and being established in the
maya-
sakti, He manifests the three Visnu forms: Karanodakasayi, Ksirodakasayi and Garbhodakasayi. In His Krsna form in Vraja, He manifests all the spiritual affairs to the superlative degree. In His Baladeva
svarupaas
sesa-tattva, He manifests
nitya-mukta-parsada-jivas, eternally liberated associates, who render eight types of service to Krsna
sesitattva-svarupa, the origin of
sesa-tattva. Again, as
sesa-rupa Sankarsana in Paravyoma, He manifests eight types of servants to render eight kinds of services as eternally liberated associates of
sesi-rupa Narayana. Maha-Visnu, who is an
avatara of Sankarsana, situates Himself in the
jiva-
sakti, and in His Paramatma
svarupa, He manifests the
jivas who have the potential to be involved in the material world. These
jivas are susceptible to the influence of
maya, and unless they attain the shelter of the
hladini-
sakti of the
cit-sakti by Bhagavan’s mercy, the possibility of their being defeated by
maya remains. The countless conditioned
jivas who have been conquered by
maya are subordinate to the three modes of material nature. Bearing all this in mind, the
siddhanta is that it is only the
jiva-
sakti, and not the
cit-
sakti, that manifests the
jivas. <o:p></o:p>
Vrajanatha: You said earlier that the
cit world is eternal, and so are the
jivas. If this is true, how can an eternal entity possibly be created, manifested or produced? If it is created at some point of time, it must have been non-existent before that, so how can we accept that it is eternal?
<o:p></o:p>
Babaji: The time and space that you experience in this material world are completely different from time and space in the spiritual world. Material time is divided into three aspects: past, present and future. However, in the spiritual world there is only one undivided, eternally present time. Every event of the spiritual world is eternally present.<o:p></o:p>
Whatever we say or describe in the material world is under the jurisdiction of material time and space, so when we say – “The
jivas were created,” “The spiritual world was manifested,” or “There is no influence of
maya in creating the form of the
jivas,” – material time is bound to influence our language and our statements. This is inevitable in our conditioned state, so we cannot remove the influence of material time from our descriptions of the atomic
jivaand spiritual objects. The conception of past, present and future always enters them in some way or another. Still, those who can discriminate properly can understand the application of the eternal present when they comprehend the purport of the descriptions of the spiritual world. Baba, be very careful in this matter. Give up the inevitable baseness, or the aspect of the description that is fit to be rejected, and have spiritual realization. <o:p></o:p>
All Vaisnavas say that the
jiva is an eternal servant of Krsna, that his eternal nature is to serve Krsna, and that he is now bound by
maya, because he has forgotten that eternal nature
. However, everyone knows that the
jiva is an eternal entity, of which there are two types:
nitya-
mukta and
nitya-baddha. The subject has been explained in this way only because the conditioned human intellect being controlled by
pramada (inattentiveness), is unable to comprehend a subject matter. Realized
sadhakas, though, experience transcendental truth through their
cit-samadhi. Our words always have some material limitation, so whatever we say will have some
mayika defects. My dear son, you should always endeavor to realize the pure truth. Logic and argument cannot help at all in this regard, so it is futile to use them to try to understand inconceivable subject matters.<o:p></o:p>
I know that you will not be able to understand these subjects in a moment, but as you cultivate these transcendental moods within your heart, you will realize
cinmaya-bhava more and more. In other words, all the transcendental moods will manifest themselves in the core of your purified heart
. Your body is material, and all the activities of your body are also material, but the essence of your being is not material; you are an atomic conscious entity. The more you know yourself, the more you will be able to realize how your
svarupa is a
tattva superior to the world of
maya. Even if I tell you, you will not realize it, or simply be hearing you will not attain it. Cultivate the practice of chanting
hari-nama as much as possible. As you go on chanting
hari-nama, these transcendental
bhavas willbegin to manifest in your heart automatically, and to the degree that they do so, you will be able to realize the transcendental world. Mind and speech both have their origin in matter, and they cannot touch the transcendental truth, even with the greatest endeavor. The
Vedas say in
Taittiriya Upanisad (2.9)<o:p></o:p>
yato vaco nivartante aprapya manasa saha<o:p></o:p>
The speech and the mind return from
brahma, being unable to attain Him.<o:p></o:p>
I advise you not to inquire about this matter from anyone, but to realize it yourself. I have just given you an indication (
abhasa). <o:p></o:p>
Vrajanatha: You have explained that the
jiva is like a spark of a burning fire, or an atomic particle in the rays of the spiritual sun. What is the role of
jiva-
sakti in this?<o:p></o:p>
Babaji: Krsna, who in these examples is compared to the blazing fire or the sun, is a self-manifest
tattva. Within the compass of that blazing fire or sun – in other words, Krsna – everything is a spiritual manifestation, and the rays spread far and wide beyond its sphere. These rays are the fractional function (
anu-karya) of the
svarupa-sakti, and the rays within that fractional function are
paramanu (atomic particles) of the spiritual sun. The
jivas are compared to this very localized, atomic
tattva.
Svarupa-sakti manifests the world within the sphere of the spiritual sun, and the function outside the sphere of the sun is carried out by
jiva-sakti, which is the direct partial representation of
cit-sakti. Therefore, the activities related to the
jiva are those of
jiva-
sakti.
Parasya saktir vividhaiva sruyate (
Svetasvatara Upanisad 6.8), “That
acintya-sakti is called
para-sakti. Although it is one, this innate potency (
sva-bhavikisakti) has manifold varieties based on
jnana (spiritual knowledge),
bala (spiritual strength), and
kriya (spiritual activities).” According to this aphorism of
sruti, the
cit-
sakti is a manifestation of the
para-sakti. It emanates from its own sphere – the spiritual realm –as the
jiva-
sakti, and in the marginal region between the spiritualand the material worlds, it manifests innumerable, eternal
jivas, who are like atomic particles in the rays of the spiritual sun. <o:p></o:p>
Vrajanatha: A burning fire, the sun, sparks, and the atomic particles of sunshine – these are all material objects. Why has a comparison been made with these material objects in the discussion of
cit-
tattva?<o:p></o:p>
Babaji: As I have already said, inevitably there are material defects in any material statements we make about
cit-
tattva, but what alternative do we have? We are obliged to use these examples, because we are helpless without them. Therefore, those who know
tattva try to explain
cid-vastu by comparing it to fire or the sun. In reality, Krsna is far superior to the sun; Krsna’s effulgence is far superior to the radiance of the sun; and Krsna’s rays and the atoms in them – that is the
jiva-
sakti and the
jivas – are far superior to the rays of the sun and the atomic particles in the rays. Still, these examples have been used because there are many similarities within them.<o:p></o:p>
Examples can explain some of the spiritual qualities, but not all. The beauty of the sun’s light and the ability of its rays to illuminate other objects are both qualities that compare with the
cittattva, for it is the quality of spirit to reveal its own beauty and to illuminate other objects. However, the scorching heat in the sunrays has no counterpart in the
cid-vastu, nor does the fact that the rays are material. Again, if we say, “This milk is like water,” we are only considering the liquid quality of water in the comparison; otherwise, if all the qualities of water were present in milk, why would the water not become milk? Examples can explain certain specific qualities of an object, but not all of its qualities and traits.