Hi Raji:

You are correct; the LS ordering is different for some reason, but I
believe the Sat-Chakra-Nirupana remains authoritative for ordering.
LS simply describes and praises each of the chakras as a form of
Lalitha. It does not prescribe a particular method for working with
the chakras, as Sat-Chakra-Nirupana does.

In any event, you've given me an idea. I am thinking it might be a
useful resource to add the LS references to the SS Chakra pages, at
least as a point of comparison, referencing the LS numbers of course,
but restoring them to the proper correspondence with Sat-Chakra-
Nirupana.

Does anyone see a problem with this?

DB



--- In Shakti_Sadhana (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com, "rajeshwari iyer"
<rajii31@...> wrote:
>
> Dear DB.
>
> I went through the below site and gathered new information on
chakras -
> they are not easy to remember - I need to work at it. I found it
easy to
> digest Amrita's explanation than Johnwoodoffer's. Amrita's final
few words
> are simple to remember and can be put into practice.
>
> I have a question - Please refer to your own site on LS - where
Kundalini
> sakti's are addressed. My point is that they are not in the same
order as
> what Amritha or Woodoffe offers.. You too dealt with those sakti's
in LS
> translation. I followed them, and made my own notes. I find it
different
> .raji
>
>
__________________________________________________ ____________________
____
> >
> >Anyone interested may also find dhyanaslokas -- along with
> >Woodroffe's translations, Amrita's explanations and beautiful
> >illustrations -- on the homepage starting at the Chakras menu:
> >
> >http://www.shaktisadhana.org/Photo%2...akrasmain.html
> >
> >DB
> >
>

Dear DB
I v already posted wot seemed to be the explanation for the ordering in LS.
Can u give ur feed back on that?
Also about Reiki, I v quoted the mantra with its meaning which occurs in yajur
veda which describes the process of reiki. A full fledged discussion on this wd
take pages so I leave here for now
Om Namas Tripurasundari

Devi Bhakta <devi_bhakta@...> wrote:
Hi Raji:

You are correct; the LS ordering is different for some reason, but I
believe the Sat-Chakra-Nirupana remains authoritative for ordering.
LS simply describes and praises each of the chakras as a form of
Lalitha. It does not prescribe a particular method for working with
the chakras, as Sat-Chakra-Nirupana does.

In any event, you've given me an idea. I am thinking it might be a
useful resource to add the LS references to the SS Chakra pages, at
least as a point of comparison, referencing the LS numbers of course,
but restoring them to the proper correspondence with Sat-Chakra-
Nirupana.

Does anyone see a problem with this?

DB



--- In Shakti_Sadhana (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com, "rajeshwari iyer"
<rajii31@...> wrote:
>
> Dear DB.
>
> I went through the below site and gathered new information on
chakras -
> they are not easy to remember - I need to work at it. I found it
easy to
> digest Amrita's explanation than Johnwoodoffer's. Amrita's final
few words
> are simple to remember and can be put into practice.
>
> I have a question - Please refer to your own site on LS - where
Kundalini
> sakti's are addressed. My point is that they are not in the same
order as
> what Amritha or Woodoffe offers.. You too dealt with those sakti's
in LS
> translation. I followed them, and made my own notes. I find it
different
> .raji
>
>
__________________________________________________ ____________________
____
> >
> >Anyone interested may also find dhyanaslokas -- along with
> >Woodroffe's translations, Amrita's explanations and beautiful
> >illustrations -- on the homepage starting at the Chakras menu:
> >
> >http://www.shaktisadhana.org/Photo%2...akrasmain.html
> >
> >DB
> >
>







SPONSORED LINKS
Traditions Divine Hinduism

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Shakti_Sadhana" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Shakti_Sadhana-unsubscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi Sankar
It's not Paathabhedam, but only ucchaarana bhedam
I salute u

sankara menon <kochu1tz@...> wrote:
Athellam sari appane. Ennalum mantrathukku ithina paadhabhedam irukkathu.

Radhakrishnan J <jayaarshree@...> wrote: Hi Raji
I d written 'lang'. Read it as 'lung'. It is actually 'lum' as pointed out by
our learned friend Sankara Menon. But the final bindu must be nasalised to
become more effective.
Another point. I am also an Iyer, so I said use Iyer Tamil. No offence. In
fact I love iyer Tamil, which I use every where as it comes most naturally to
me.
Om Nams Tripurasundari
rajeshwari iyer <rajii31@...> wrote:
Dear DB.

I went through the below site and gathered new information on chakras -
they are not easy to remember - I need to work at it. I found it easy to
digest Amrita's explanation than Johnwoodoffer's. Amrita's final few words
are simple to remember and can be put into practice.

I have a question - Please refer to your own site on LS - where Kundalini
sakti's are addressed. My point is that they are not in the same order as
what Amritha or Woodoffe offers.. You too dealt with those sakti's in LS
translation. I followed them, and made my own notes. I find it different
..raji

__________________________________________________ ________________________
>
>Anyone interested may also find dhyanaslokas -- along with
>Woodroffe's translations, Amrita's explanations and beautiful
>illustrations -- on the homepage starting at the Chakras menu:
>
>http://www.shaktisadhana.org/Photo%2...akrasmain.html
>
>DB
>




SPONSORED LINKS
Traditions Divine Hinduism

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Shakti_Sadhana" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Shakti_Sadhana-unsubscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





SPONSORED LINKS
Traditions Divine Hinduism

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Shakti_Sadhana" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Shakti_Sadhana-unsubscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Traditions Divine Hinduism

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "Shakti_Sadhana" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Shakti_Sadhana-unsubscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi Raji:

I looked quickly back through posts, and -- please forgive me -- I
cannot find your proposed explanation for the LS ordering. Could you
kindly let me know the message number, or excerpt your statement in
response?

Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience

DB

--- In Shakti_Sadhana (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com, Radhakrishnan J
<jayaarshree@...> wrote:
>
> Dear DB
> I v already posted wot seemed to be the explanation for the
ordering in LS. Can u give ur feed back on that?
> Also about Reiki, I v quoted the mantra with its meaning which
occurs in yajur veda which describes the process of reiki. A full
fledged discussion on this wd take pages so I leave here for now
> Om Namas Tripurasundari
>
> Devi Bhakta <devi_bhakta@...> wrote:
> Hi Raji:
>
> You are correct; the LS ordering is different for some reason, but
I
> believe the Sat-Chakra-Nirupana remains authoritative for ordering.
> LS simply describes and praises each of the chakras as a form of
> Lalitha. It does not prescribe a particular method for working with
> the chakras, as Sat-Chakra-Nirupana does.
>
> In any event, you've given me an idea. I am thinking it might be a
> useful resource to add the LS references to the SS Chakra pages, at
> least as a point of comparison, referencing the LS numbers of
course,
> but restoring them to the proper correspondence with Sat-Chakra-
> Nirupana.
>
> Does anyone see a problem with this?
>
> DB
>
>
>
> --- In Shakti_Sadhana (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com, "rajeshwari iyer"
> <rajii31@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear DB.
> >
> > I went through the below site and gathered new information on
> chakras -
> > they are not easy to remember - I need to work at it. I found it
> easy to
> > digest Amrita's explanation than Johnwoodoffer's. Amrita's final
> few words
> > are simple to remember and can be put into practice.
> >
> > I have a question - Please refer to your own site on LS - where
> Kundalini
> > sakti's are addressed. My point is that they are not in the same
> order as
> > what Amritha or Woodoffe offers.. You too dealt with those
sakti's
> in LS
> > translation. I followed them, and made my own notes. I find it
> different
> > .raji
> >
> >
>
__________________________________________________ ____________________
> ____
> > >
> > >Anyone interested may also find dhyanaslokas -- along with
> > >Woodroffe's translations, Amrita's explanations and beautiful
> > >illustrations -- on the homepage starting at the Chakras menu:
> > >
> > >http://www.shaktisadhana.org/Photo%2...akrasmain.html
> > >
> > >DB
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Traditions Divine Hinduism
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "Shakti_Sadhana" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Shakti_Sadhana-unsubscribe (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail
> Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Hi DB,

Below information- is what I have in my record. Other details, I did not
save but noted down and deleted. Below , I posted LS site(from your web
page), please go to page 26 - titled KUNDILINI. where respective saktis are
mentioned along with their food offerings.

When I opened Amrita's link - I found different order. For eg: DAKINI
represents muladhara whereas in your note DAKINI represented VISHUDHA chakra
along with Amrita and other saktis. This difference what prompted me to ask
you. raji
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
-----------------------------------------------------------
Subject : [Shakti_Sadhana] NOTE: LalithA SahasranAma [534]: End of Chakras


With name 534, we complete the Chakra Series of the Namas that began
with Nama 475.

These detailed the seven chakras, the seven bodily tissues governed by
them, their presiding deities, and their NaivedyAs,the YoginIs or
attendants, and the Nama aspect of Reality as letters of the alphabet
(or MAtrikA) from A to Ksa. At deeper levels of interpretation, these
Namas also represent the seven planes of consciousness (or lokAs), and
the various stages of an embryo's development in the womb of its
Mother.


-->
>
>yAkinyambAsvarUpini : Assuming the form of the mother YAkini
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
---------------------------------------------------------->
>
YOU MAY FIND SAKTI'S REPRESENTING CHAKRAS IN BELOW SITE.. Please go to page
26 Titled Kundilini.

http://shaktisadhana.50megs.com/imag...hasranama.html


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
----------------------------------------------------------
>






>
>Hi Raji:
>
>You are correct; the LS ordering is different for some reason, but I
>believe the Sat-Chakra-Nirupana remains authoritative for ordering.
>LS simply describes and praises each of the chakras as a form of
>Lalitha. It does not prescribe a particular method for working with
>the chakras, as Sat-Chakra-Nirupana does.
>
>In any event, you've given me an idea. I am thinking it might be a
>useful resource to add the LS references to the SS Chakra pages, at
>least as a point of comparison, referencing the LS numbers of course,
>but restoring them to the proper correspondence with Sat-Chakra-
>Nirupana.
>
>Does anyone see a problem with this?
>
>DB
>
>
>
>--- In Shakti_Sadhana (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com, "rajeshwari iyer"
><rajii31@...> wrote:
> >
> > Dear DB.
> >
> > I went through the below site and gathered new information on
>chakras -
> > they are not easy to remember - I need to work at it. I found it
>easy to
> > digest Amrita's explanation than Johnwoodoffer's. Amrita's final
>few words
> > are simple to remember and can be put into practice.
> >
> > I have a question - Please refer to your own site on LS - where
>Kundalini
> > sakti's are addressed. My point is that they are not in the same
>order as
> > what Amritha or Woodoffe offers.. You too dealt with those sakti's
>in LS
> > translation. I followed them, and made my own notes. I find it
>different
> > .raji
> >
> >
>_________________________________________________ _____________________

Thanks Raji:

I will look back through these and try to think it through and see if
anything comes up -- then will get back to you. Thanks for
summarizing for me.

DB

--- In Shakti_Sadhana (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com, "rajeshwari iyer"
<rajii31@...> wrote:
>
> Hi DB,
>
> Below information- is what I have in my record. Other details, I
did not
> save but noted down and deleted. Below , I posted LS site(from
your web
> page), please go to page 26 - titled KUNDILINI. where respective
saktis are
> mentioned along with their food offerings.
>
> When I opened Amrita's link - I found different order. For eg:
DAKINI
> represents muladhara whereas in your note DAKINI represented
VISHUDHA chakra
> along with Amrita and other saktis. This difference what prompted
me to ask
> you. raji
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> Subject : [Shakti_Sadhana] NOTE: LalithA SahasranAma [534]: End of
Chakras
>
>
> With name 534, we complete the Chakra Series of the Namas that began
> with Nama 475.
>
> These detailed the seven chakras, the seven bodily tissues governed
by
> them, their presiding deities, and their NaivedyAs,the YoginIs or
> attendants, and the Nama aspect of Reality as letters of the
alphabet
> (or MAtrikA) from A to Ksa. At deeper levels of interpretation,
these
> Namas also represent the seven planes of consciousness (or lokAs),
and
> the various stages of an embryo's development in the womb of its
> Mother.
>
>
> -->
> >
> >yAkinyambAsvarUpini : Assuming the form of the mother YAkini
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> YOU MAY FIND SAKTI'S REPRESENTING CHAKRAS IN BELOW SITE.. Please go
to page
> 26 Titled Kundilini.
>
> http://shaktisadhana.50megs.com/imag...hasranama.html
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> >Hi Raji:
> >
> >You are correct; the LS ordering is different for some reason, but
I
> >believe the Sat-Chakra-Nirupana remains authoritative for ordering.
> >LS simply describes and praises each of the chakras as a form of
> >Lalitha. It does not prescribe a particular method for working with
> >the chakras, as Sat-Chakra-Nirupana does.
> >
> >In any event, you've given me an idea. I am thinking it might be a
> >useful resource to add the LS references to the SS Chakra pages, at
> >least as a point of comparison, referencing the LS numbers of
course,
> >but restoring them to the proper correspondence with Sat-Chakra-
> >Nirupana.
> >
> >Does anyone see a problem with this?
> >
> >DB
> >
> >
> >
> >--- In Shakti_Sadhana (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com, "rajeshwari iyer"
> ><rajii31@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear DB.
> > >
> > > I went through the below site and gathered new information on
> >chakras -
> > > they are not easy to remember - I need to work at it. I found
it
> >easy to
> > > digest Amrita's explanation than Johnwoodoffer's. Amrita's final
> >few words
> > > are simple to remember and can be put into practice.
> > >
> > > I have a question - Please refer to your own site on LS - where
> >Kundalini
> > > sakti's are addressed. My point is that they are not in the
same
> >order as
> > > what Amritha or Woodoffe offers.. You too dealt with those
sakti's
> >in LS
> > > translation. I followed them, and made my own notes. I find it
> >different
> > > .raji
> > >
> > >
>
>_________________________________________________ ____________________
_
>