Ramakanta contradicts himself again.
Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!
> In this case the status quo was locked in place with signed directives to
> the GBC just prior to Srila Prabhupada's physical departure.
As I already wrote several times, if there is other evidence besides your
points a) and b) that you think prove your point c), then you can present it
later. First you have to admit that your points a) and b) alone do not prove
your point c). You already half admitted it. I just want a clear statement
from you.
So please write, "We admit that our points a) and b) alone do not prove our
point c). It is just our opinion that if points a) and b) are correct then
point c) is proven. But we say that point c) is proven by other evidence."
> You have to prove that the GBC can stop following the orders they were
> given (July 9th etc) and thus change the status quo.
I do not have to prove statements that I did not make.
ys Ramakanta dasa
|