|
01-14-2007, 10:32 PM
|
#1 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
renunciants resided in several mathas
>"Most were from lower classes and were married, although some >renunciants resided in the sect's several mathas." > >Does this literally mean that some renunciants resided in *all* of >the sect's mathas? Or is it an acceptable usage, similar to "We are >not our body"? It's okay. |
|
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| renunciants resided in several mathas | Bhakti Vikasa Swami | ISKCON Internal | 0 | 01-12-2007 09:50 PM |
| is the apostrophe after "renunciants" required? | Jayadvaita Swami | ISKCON Internal | 0 | 11-29-2005 09:37 AM |
| is the apostraphe after "renunciants" required? | Bhakti Vikasa Swami | ISKCON Internal | 0 | 11-26-2005 12:19 PM |
| DEAR RENUNCIANTS: "I BEG YOU TO NEVER PERSONALLY TALK WITH WOMEN!" | (Bhaktiratna) Sadhu Swami (GaurangaDharma.org) | ISKCON Internal | 0 | 07-21-2002 11:12 AM |
|
|
|
The Audarya Fellowship has had 6,020 page views since creation.