Re: Re: Re: "Have to"s of the Ramanamaharshi group

Dear John,

It is clear that you disagree with the moderators of the RamanaMaharshi Group.
But since the moderators act on behalf of the whole group, we respect their
decision.

If people overwhelmingly disagreed with the moderation here, they would leave in
protest. That is clearly not happening.

Surely nothing prevents you from having a private correspondence with Sandeep on
spiritual matters and benefitting from his thoughts.

Love to all,
Harsha





>
> From: chueewowee
> Date: 2003/10/04 Sat PM 02:23:09 EDT
> To: RamanaMaharshi (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com
> Subject: Re: [RamanaMaharshi] Re: "Have to"s of the Ramanamaharshi group
>
>
>
> 2/10/03 10:57 PM -0400 harsha@... harsha@... wrote:
>
> > Is it not true that Sri Bhagavan Himself followed the rules of the Ashram
> > and that when visitors did not act in a way that was considered
> > appropriate at Sri Ramanaashram that they were asked to leave?
>
> I do not see how Sandeep has contravened a rule. Could you demonstrate? For
> rules must not be spoke of in passing without demonstrating a breach, or
> they are a cause for personal bias.
>
> Regards,
>
> John Plum
> Verdana
>
>
> 2/10/03 10:57 PM -0400 harsha@... harsha@... wrote:
>
>
> > Is it not true that Sri Bhagavan Himself followed the rules of the Ashram
>
> > and that when visitors did not act in a way that was considered
>
> > appropriate at Sri Ramanaashram that they were asked to leave?
>
>
> I do not see how Sandeep has contravened a rule. Could you demonstrate? For
rules must not be spoke of in passing without demonstrating a breach, or they
are a cause for personal bias.
>
>
> Regards,


http://www.harshasatsangh.com

"Love itself is the actual form of God."

Ramana Maharshi

Thanks Harsha,
4/10/03 3:42 PM -0400 harsha (AT) cox (DOT) net harsha (AT) cox (DOT) net wrote:
> If people overwhelmingly disagreed with the moderation here, they would
> leave in protest. That is clearly not happening.
Perhaps, I do not know because I have not been a long-time member.
>
> Surely nothing prevents you from having a private correspondence with
> Sandeep on spiritual matters and benefitting from his thoughts.
Thay is true.
ANyhow, I like this group, I must say. I was unsure of Sandeep's thought or
position at first, and wondered about it in the context of the group. Then I
thought it was a healthy position, along with all the different contributions
on a topic, and finding that Sandeep was not at all arrogant in reply to my
questions to him.
Then perhaps the moderators here know best for the group. I hope Sandeep can
find he can contribute too, without any detraction required by anyone. Perhaps
he just needs to be a little more thoughtful then in consideration of what has
been said to him. I know I often feel my posts are a little arrogant or
unsympathetic, but know I do improve by continuing to correspond, with a little
more heart in understanding each time.
Regards,
John Plum