Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sarojram18
10.The universal philosophy.
The philosophy of Ramanuja can be called Universal as it
interprets the Brahmasuthras in such a manner as to show the
Saarirkasastra as the Brahmasuthra is called, as an integral
whole.Universe according to Ramanuja is not bhramamaya, illusory but
Brahmamaya, as there is no other reality than Brahman, the inner self of
everything.
The universal or all embracing character of the Visishtadvaita
philosophy arises out of the assimilation therin of all cardinal
principles of all systems. Only their theory of reality and
subsequently their theory of causation is opposed by Ramanuja . The
sarira-sariri bhava accomodates all the commendable aspects of others
since everything constitutes the sarira of Brahman. Brahmaathmakathva,
Brahman as the indwelling Self of all, implies unity and harmony . The
basic principles of even the heterodox schools like Buddhism and Jainism
like ahimsa find a place in Visishtadvaita.Likewise the thathvas, the
evolutes of prakrthi of Sankhya,.the discipline of Yoga and dialectics
of Nyaya-viseshika have a place in Visishtadvaita. Ramanuja is opposed
only to the theory of causation of these schools. That is why in
Sribhashya the criticism of Ramanuja of the non-vedantic schools of
Philosophy is levelled against their theory of causation, based on their
theory of reality.
|
Thanks for this information. So it would be fair to say that Visistadvaita best represents the religion of the Upanishads. I've heard that Ramanuja bases his philosophy on the Brahma-sutras commentary of Bodhayana (400BC). So does this mean that visistadvaita is older than advaita? Neutral scholars have said that Ramanuja and Nimbarkar are more closer to the original Brahma-sutras than Shankara.
But Visistadvaitists need to do alot more to promote their teachings in the world, because the advaitists are dominating.