That's paradoxical, brother, but I'll try not to be so abrasive. In hindsight, I came off pretty "off-the-top". I'm for neither of them either, and yet I wish the best for both of them. I think that statements like,
Quote:
|
"My view is that the British bankers and the Israelis that are in control of the Us Government and using it for war profiteering and exploitation are basically the same as the pharisees and now are crucifying Jesus again and trying to crucify the world as well."
|
are uncalled for and not only relinquish the personal responsibilities of all those involved in war profiteering, but place the full burden on a select few. You obviously targeted Israelis and British Bankers as being in control of the US Government. I don't think I misunderstood that. I don't think shifting the burden of proof to me helps this subject any. I am not the one making a claim that Jews and Brits are in control of US. Last I checked George W. Bush was the president (2 terms!) and it is he that has the right to declare war. I'm sure there are Brits, Israelites, Americans, Saudis, and Palestinians who profit off of war. Call a spade a spade, it isn't just a Jew and a Brit who spill blood. And what about the "rapture and second coming" point I made. Why does it have to be a Jew who has interest in Israel. What about the East Gate in Jerusalem and the Christian interests there? I think your isolation of "Israelites" is unfair, and please don't think I am targeting you. It was just your statement. I'm sorry I made you uncomfortable. I'll try to not repeat that. Cheers!