Finally! A brief and to-the-point reply! I'm so proud of you.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bhaktajan
Bhaktajan sought to show that “Devi’s” existence required finding an appropriate Husband.
|
I like it that you talk about yourself in third person. Very intriguing!
Your inappropriate use of the third-person shines much light on an esoteric subject that is usually lost to most samsara-ites.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bhaktajan
For example,
1] Krishna's 'internal-pleasure potentcy' is considered feminine (the energy) and, Krishna is considered mascaline (the energetic).
Krishna's 'internal-pleasure potentcy' could stay in a nidra-Narayana (Mahavishnu's sleep) state until the creative-potency stirs -- thus, necessitating the Masculine Feature of the Purusha (Persona) to consort with.
IOW Hara awoke, thus, causing Adi-Purusha to sporting pastimes.
2] If Durga exists then it is required to find the best suited husband . . . Voila! --and who do you think that would be?
|
Although this is a wonderfully brief reply, I don't really see what Durga having a husband has to do with selling off virgins for afterlife benefits.