|

12-10-2008, 12:32 AM
Bhaktajan sought to show that “Devi’s” existence required finding an appropriate Husband.
For example,
1] Krishna's 'internal-pleasure potentcy' is considered feminine (the energy) and, Krishna is considered mascaline (the energetic).
Krishna's 'internal-pleasure potentcy' could stay in a nidra-Narayana (Mahavishnu's sleep) state until the creative-potency stirs -- thus, necessitating the Masculine Feature of the Purusha (Persona) to consort with.
IOW Hara awoke, thus, causing Adi-Purusha to sporting pastimes.
2] If Durga exists then it is required to find the best suited husband . . . Voila! --and who do you think that would be?
|